Full story (reg req)
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_pg=1673&u_sid=2209303Published Thursday
July 20, 2006
Ricketts says donations don't contradict stands
BY JAKE THOMPSON
WORLD-HERALD BUREAU
WASHINGTON - In a debate this spring, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Pete Ricketts rapped a pet project of Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, one critics had dubbed the "Bridge to Nowhere."
Republican U.S. Senate candidate Pete Ricketts
"Let's think about the things we're spending money on that don't make any sense - (a) $220 million bridge in Alaska that goes to an island with 50 people on it," Ricketts said in April.
In June, Ricketts accepted a $5,000 campaign donation from Stevens.
And Tuesday night, Ricketts held a fundraiser in Washington where Stevens was listed on the event's invitation as a "special featured guest" - although the Alaskan didn't attend.
Ricketts said he didn't see a contradiction in criticizing Stevens, then taking money from him.
"He and I agree on one thing that is really important, that Republicans retain control of the United States Senate," Ricketts said.
Nor did he see a contradiction in seeking donations from special interest groups at the fundraiser, although he has chided his opponent, Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson, for gathering campaign cash from special interests.
The proposed Alaska bridge gained notoriety during congressional debate last fall over congressional "earmarks."
Often called pork barrel spending, earmarks occur when individual lawmakers insert, often without debate and sometimes without knowledge of colleagues, budget items that steer money to specific projects in their home states.
Stevens, the Senate's most senior Republican and a former chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, has championed his ability to obtain earmarks for his state. He fiercely defended the bridge as a worthy earmark, but after public outcry he gave up and the project lost its funding.
During his primary campaign, Ricketts called the bridge an example of congressional earmarking he'd work to eliminate or reform.