Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: U.S. Plans Shift in Iraq Strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:12 AM
Original message
LAT: U.S. Plans Shift in Iraq Strategy
U.S. Plans Shift in Iraq Strategy
By Peter Spiegel, Times Staff Writer
July 22, 2006

WASHINGTON — President Bush is expected to announce a significant shift in strategy for improving Baghdad's security when the Iraqi prime minister visits Washington next week, an acknowledgment that a much-publicized military operation launched last month has failed to stem the violence....

***

A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, as is routine when discussing future White House initiatives, said the new strategy that Bush and Maliki intended to hash out would include "shifts in resources" and "shifts in emphasis."

The change could include redeploying U.S. forces from elsewhere in the country to Baghdad....

***

Iraqi forces have taken over security responsibilities in several Baghdad neighborhoods....Asked whether the shift in strategy could lead U.S. forces to reassume control of those areas, the official said, "That certainly would be an appropriate thing to discuss."...

***

The new security policy for Baghdad probably will include an increased emphasis on rounding up local leaders who are instigating and provoking sectarian violence, such as members of the militia loyal to radical Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr. He has been blamed for inspiring much of the anti-Sunni violence perpetrated by Shiite death squads....

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-maliki22jul22,0,5115604.story?coll=la-home-world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. The troops they are redeploying
must be coming from somewhere where anarchy will replace any order that there was there. Bush's plan is like writing off the whole country to save Baghdad. The only reason he'd do that is if its a last stand situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. we have called Afghanistan a "success" when only Kabul is controlled
we can call Iraq a "success" if only Baghdad is controlled & "secure" - right?

:sarcasm:

besides no one who MATTERS ventures outside the green zone....

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shifts in resources, shifts in emphasis, shifts in position of deck chairs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. This administration isn't sinking, this administration is SOARING...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Circling the wagons?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yes
The country is about to break into three.

They need to protect:

1. The green zone

2. The Oil Wells

3. Is there a three?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. they need a shift in thinking!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Going to CUT AND RUN from the rest of Iraq and focus on Baghdad?
At least that will stop the "Whack-A-Mole" policy of fighting insurgents and leave the cities to fall under militia control.



WHHHEEEEEEEE!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is Bush wearing his shift again?
That's all he seems to wear these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmm, I am sure I saw the headline somewhere before...
let me see.....ahh, yes...here it is:

A Shift on Iraq
The Generals Plan a Slow Exit

By David Ignatius

Monday, September 26, 2005; Page A23

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/25/AR2005092501298.html

from the September 17, 2004 edition

What's behind US strategy shift in Iraq war

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0917/p02s02-woiq.html

Calls for Shift in Iraq Strategy Growing
Lawmakers, Experts Urge Military to Focus More on Protecting Population Centers

By Bradley Graham
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 11, 2005; A16


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/10/AR2005111002063_pf.html

Bush Administration Plans Major Shift in Military Strategy

Aired September 20, 2002 - 09:02 ET

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0209/20/ltm.06.html

I would post more but it might cause me to "shift" my strategy, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good work, Spazito! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks! I tried to limit it to one headline per year, lol
I see I missed 2003, I have no doubt there was one for that year as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hey, we confirmed there are no WMD's, we stopped Saddam
and his brutality, and the Iraqis are now free, such as it is.

Sounds like victory. Our work here is done. Medals for everybody! Let's go home!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC