Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hastert: House may challenge office search

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:18 AM
Original message
Hastert: House may challenge office search
Hastert: House may challenge office search
16 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - House Speaker Dennis Hastert said Sunday he may challenge a judge's order allowing FBI agents to examine documents seized at a Louisiana congressman's Capitol Hill office in a bribery probe.

"The gentleman from Louisiana is in big trouble, as far as I'm concerned. And we're not trying to protect him," said Hastert, R-Ill.

"But there has to be a procedure for the Justice Department to come in and start just searching any congressman's office," he said. "We may take a fine line depending on how the negotiations are. There is a constitutional division there that we have to protect."

Last week, Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan denied Jefferson's request to delay the investigation while the congressman appeals the judge's earlier ruling that the office search was legal.
(snip/...)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060723/ap_on_go_co/raid_on_congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is it you want to hide?
Was there something so terrible in Jefferson's office that it might incriminate Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. What are you so worried about Denny?
Turkey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Almost makes you wonder if Jefferson's office was searched
SO that they could have this argument.
Legal precedent and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. This article fails to mention that breach of separation of powers...
was the complaint by Congress. The act was unprecedented in our history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. A puke ploy to keep disgraced Democrat in the headlines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds Like The GOP Has Something to Fear
What is it they say about domestic spying....oh, yeah:

"If you haven't done anything wrong, then you have nothing to worry about!"

Sauce for the goose, and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Head up on Hastert
They may raid his office. He has been caught in a land deal and $1000.00 a day fishing trips paid for by lobbyist's from the Oil Companies.

www.john06.com

link is the vet running against Hastert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Denny Denny Denny what are you hiding in your office....
the FBI did in fact go to a Judge and got a search warrant... UNLIKE the NSA what just taps my phone without one...... Why should there be one set of rule for you and another for the unwashed masses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Of all the opportunities...
...congress has to address separation of powers issues, or to show some bipartisanship...

...they choose only the one that covers their own asses.

Kinda telling, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kicking!
:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Vanity Fair: Turks Boasted of Payments to Hastert
Edited on Sun Jul-23-06 05:10 PM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. I belive Hastert is correct. The seperation of powers is paramount.
If congress does not fight this, they will lose their power permanently.

If we ever get our Democracy back with fair elections, we don't want this precedent on the books.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-23-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Who checks the legislative branch?
I haven't kept up 100% in this story so I may be missing something very obvious but...

Didn't the other two branches. Ex/A.G. Office & Judicial/Judge, sign off on this search?

Who should've investigated this, please don't say a self-investigation by the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC