Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Guggenheim Study Suggests Arts Education Benefits Literacy Skills

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 11:33 PM
Original message
NYT: Guggenheim Study Suggests Arts Education Benefits Literacy Skills
Guggenheim Study Suggests Arts Education Benefits Literacy Skills
By RANDY KENNEDY
Published: July 27, 2006

In an era of widespread cuts in public-school art programs, the question has become increasingly relevant: does learning about paintings and sculpture help children become better students in other areas?

A study to be released today by the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum suggests that it does, citing improvements in a range of literacy skills among students who took part in a program in which the Guggenheim sends artists into schools. The study, now in its second year, interviewed hundreds of New York City third graders, some of whom had participated in the Guggenheim program, called Learning Through Art, and others who did not.

The study found that students in the program performed better in six categories of literacy and critical thinking skills — including thorough description, hypothesizing and reasoning — than did students who were not in the program. The children were assessed as they discussed a passage in a children’s book, Cynthia Kadohata’s “Kira-Kira,” and a painting by Arshile Gorky, “The Artist and His Mother.”

The results of the study, which are to be presented today and tomorrow at a conference at the Guggenheim, are likely to stimulate debate at a time when the federal education law known as No Child Left Behind has led schools to increase class time spent on math and reading significantly, often at the expense of other subjects, including art.

Yet the study also found that the program did not help improve students’ scores on the city’s standardized English language arts test, a result that the study’s creators said they could not fully explain. They suggested that the disparity might be related to the fact that the standardized test is written while the study’s interviews were oral....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/books/27gugg.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babydollhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. art saves lives n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Arts have long been proven to "benefit" students
in all different levels of learning.

This reminds me of the Clemente Course in the Humanities. Here's one story http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A26357-2002Apr10

No Child Left Behind is not about "education." NCLB is all about extinguishing learning in exchange for regimentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the link, gumby. I didn't know about that program. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Exactly
Worth noting that the study says no improvement in standardized test scores - just in the real thing - literacy (creative and critical thinking.)

High stakes testing is all about excluding people (children) from opportunity. It's not about raising levels of literacy, numeracy, creativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. I did my thesis on this premise with music education.
Edited on Thu Jul-27-06 12:40 AM by no_hypocrisy
I maintained that every child should be able to sightsing and to read music the way each child should be literate with the word. I started with Zoltan Kodaly's hand signs for notes and the moveable do system, continued with Carl Orff and his rhythm system, and included Emil Jacques Dalcroze's fixed do system and music/dance. I had to whittle it down to Zodaly. But it makes sense that if a child is taught to teach both music and language together, both hemispheres of the brain are developed with the right/spacial with music and the left/logical with language with some cross-over. I used primary sources for a lot of my paper.

Ironically now I find public schools eliminating music education. The music classes that remain I sadly report that the kids are not being taught to sing unless it's along with a videotape or a loop of audiotape. But they can still respond if you whip out a guitar or other instrument and teach them some folk songs -- as long as they're 7 or under . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Your references are beyond my learnin'
However, your thesis that music (arts) education integrates the hemispheres of the brain is indeed intriguing and one I instinctively agree with. (Do I have that correct?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. it's been proven that music can greatly increase math skills . . .
don't have a reference handy, but the relationship of music and mathematics is well documented . . . my own nephew, for example, is an average student in everything but math, where he excels . . . he also plays bass, piano, and a couple of other instruments, sight reads music, and composes his own pieces . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. You're correct. Take for example fractions are easily explained and
demonstrated by learning meter and the subdivisions of notes in rhythm.
3/4 time is three notes per measure; 4/4 time is 4 notes per meter, etc. A "whole" note is 4 beats, a "half" note is 2 beats; a quarter note is one beat; there are 2 eighth notes in a note/beat, etc.

Carl Orff organized rhythm where one could recite and clap/stamp one's foot the rhythm to integrate the feeling of the rhythm in one's body as one could sing the notes written. For example, a 4/4 meter with four notes could be ta, ta, ta, ta. Eighth notes were tee-tee. So one could recite/clap ta, ta, tee-tee, ta for 2 notes/2 eighth notes/1 note in a measure and feel the rhythm. Later, you could transfer this to percussive instruments such as drums or xylophones, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. They have no dog in this fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Excuse Me But What The Shit Are You Talking About? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Guess he didn't have any arts education....
Considering his literacy "skills."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Huh?
I don't suppose you could offer up more than some bizarro post header?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. shakalaka ding dong? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. I may agree but not exactly an independent third party here...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm more worried than ever about the state of education.
My main concerns are the policy, cultural mind-set, and economic issues.

First let me say that in my idea of a perfect America, kids would have a rigorous but stimulating and supportive school day, with a variety of subjects and activities (everything from recess and PE to all the sciences, a variety of foreign languages, and of course lots of focus on reading and math skills).

However, knowing what teachers and students have to deal with in terms of funding limitations, discipline, and everything else, I would settle for well-staffed schools, solid instruction and remedial work, and so forth.

I fear we are getting stuck in a pattern that focuses on teaching to the test, on overreliance on statistics ("Our students raised their performance in the statewide reading test for the third year in a row!"). I'm worried that we don't focus on what learning and being a well-balanced human being really mean.

It concerns me that physical activity, science, history and geography, and the arts are being cut in various areas. School should be more than just preparing for the next standardized exam, and education should be about more than a politician's talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. That's my concern, too
If I won Powerball, I'd found a school built around the arts with free or low tuition and admission by lottery.

The students would learn to read out of real books with interesting stories. They'd each learn to sight sing and play a musical instrument. They would have daily art classes, combining structured instruction in how to draw and paint with plenty of scope for creativity. Science and social studies classes would involve a lot of thought experiments as well as facts. Math would be connected to the real world and would start with pencil and paper calculation. (People who learned with calculators have trouble with pencil and paper computation, while those of us who learned with pencil and paper can easily switch to calculators.) Foreign language instruction would begin in fifth grade. Literature and social studies and foreign language classes would incorporate drama. PE classes would focus on improving personal fitness through running, swimming, and strength training, not on team sports.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. without art there wouldn't be civilization
yet for some reason artists starve to death. Yet Britney Spears makes millions and she is far from anything remotely artistic....

Just as teachers are underpaid, our country is in a freefall with stupid asses watching reality shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'll wait to see a controlled study, thank you.
The "Mozart effect" was touted to do the same, mostly by people that advocated greater music education.

However, two things later came out. Those that stuck with music were self-selected, and typically had been doing well in it while maintaining a suitable GPA; and those that stuck with it had their lives better structured, and were motivated to keep up their academics.

So the net conclusion: those that have structured routines, are motivated to do their schoolwork, and have average and above average GPAs do better in school. With or without music education. In short, the Mozart effect was a tautology.

Also, having the results derive from purely oral responses is a difficult thing to evaluate. You can't ask for a second opinion; you can't validate and document the results.

I'll wait for a controlled study, in which the participants are randomly chosen, compared to a truly comparable , and the results are more readily validated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. It's beyond improving literacy skills
The arts give students a motivation for studying. They provide an emotional outlet.

I once heard an interview with a man who advocated including more arts and literature into the school curriculum. He said, in essence, that all adolescents go through periods when they are angry, frustrated, and hate the whole world. If they have no constructive outlet for their feelings, they may turn to violence, vandalism, hedonism, or self-destructive behavior. He said that when he hated the whole world, he wrote poetry.

I myself used to play the piano for hours when I couldn't deal with the craziness anymore.

Sure beats beating people up or etching grafitti into store windows or drinking till you pass out or cutting yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-27-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is a very fascinating thread.
Too bad there haven't been more participants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC