Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP leader apologizes to Strickland; staffer is fired for an e-mail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:36 AM
Original message
GOP leader apologizes to Strickland; staffer is fired for an e-mail
packed with allegations

http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060728/NEWS09/607280411/-1/NEWS

By JIM TANKERSLEY
BLADE POLITICS WRITER

The Ohio Republican Party chairman apologized to U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland yesterday for a GOP e-mail that questioned Mr. Strickland’s sexuality, and the staff member who sent it was fired.

Mr. Strickland is the Democratic nominee for governor.

The e-mail — sent July 17 by the state Republican Party’s social conservative coordinator, Gary Lankford, and first reported Sunday by The Blade — attacked Mr. Strickland’s resume and alleged piety, and it linked to an Internet post suggesting that both he and his wife, Frances, are gay.

Ohio GOP officials condemned the message last week and said they disciplined Mr. Lankford but did not fire him. Yesterday, party chairman Bob Bennett wrote Mr. Strickland to offer “sincere apologies” for the e-mail’s “inappropriate suggestions about your private life.”...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. phonies & hypocrites w/fake apology - the damage is done if
there was any damage. most likely this info appealed only to the base, AND

strickland should use the whole issue as an attack against corrupt bush/blackwell republicans.

A good opportunity to point out how much republicans WANT to control people's private lives.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/howarddean2008.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maseman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. What a bunch of pantie-wastes
Edited on Fri Jul-28-06 12:00 PM by maseman
I must say that in 2000 and 2004 that may have flown. You know the old Rovian tactic of "float the rumor balloon and then let the fundies take over."

But people paying $3/gallon gas, getting laid-off, being taxed by Ohio Republicans, scared to loose their job, paying higher health costs, college costs soaring, kids getting killed in Iraq and on and on...are more on people's minds then if Strickland is gay. (which he isn't of course.)

Dear Jesus...please protect me from your followers. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. He took a page from Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSun Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Desperate Republicans
I don't think Ohioans will be fooled this time. Too much pain out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. As an Ohioan....
...I wish I could share your confidence. But too many are willing to latch on to lies and not let go.

To me it's too little, too late. The smears are now out there, people have had time to digest them, and no apology, no matter how heartfelt, will take back those words.

It's Mission Accomplished for the Ohio GOP. The asshole who got fired merely took one for the team, and was probably most happy to do so. Anyone who thinks this "act of contrition" is sincere is just plain naive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Filthy pathetic Rovian tactics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Filthy, disgusting, pathetic Rovian tactics-will mind-numb Ohioans see it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sometime's "Sorry" is just not good enough
Dems are going to have to do some heavy lifting to fix my once proud state, Ohio.

They could start by removing the tax exempt status of all the "frickin' Mega-churches" that are nothing but fronts for the Republican Party.

I've got an idea for the fucking fundies in Ohio. If the Rapture is coming, there's no fucking reason for you to vote. Stay home and wax your pubes for the "Bridegroom" "cummeth"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. i'm surprised they didn't use
"But we were only joking!" cop-out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. finally an apology from Guilty Old Party,then they play race card
Edited on Fri Jul-28-06 12:20 PM by Algorem
"...Bennett also urged Strickland “to publicly condemn the racially-motivated hate campaign being waged by members of your Democratic Party against” GOP gubernatorial nominee J. Kenneth Blackwell, who is black...

Strickland called the firing of Lankford “appropriate,” but said it seemed more than coincidental that before being hired by the Ohio GOP Lankford had worked for Blackwell and he was a board member of the Ohio Restoration Project, a conservative religious group that has featured Blackwell at its meetings...

Referring to Bennett's call for him to condemn a racial hate campaign allegedly being waged by Democrats against Blackwell, Strickland said he was unaware of any such tactics...

Strickland said there is “a relevant distinction” between a GOP paid staffer sending out hateful e-mails and scurrilous commentary made by bloggers that neither his campaign nor the Ohio Democratic Party control..."

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/news-story.php?story=201626
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The GOP's Sleaziest Attack Campaign
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=106378

How low will Republicans go to try and hang onto control of Ohio, the swing state where their machinations secured the presidency for George W. Bush in 2004?

Lower than reasonable Americans, no matter what their partisanship, no matter what their ideology, could imagine.

Gary Lankford, the Ohio Republican Party's recently hired "social conservative coordinator" this week dispatched a mass e-mail to so-called "pro-family friends" that featured his 10-point introduction to U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland, the Democratic nominee for governor.

Strickland, an ordained Methodist minister who has thrown Republicans for a loop by speaking about his faith during the campaign, is running far ahead of scandal-plagued Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, the Republican nominee who gained national fame in 2004 when he was broadly accused of manipulating election processes and vote counting to favor Bush in the presidential race...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, I'll Believe It
When I see the size of Lankford's separation bonus. Anyone want to bet this is a variation on Swift Boating & Lankford volunteered to float the nasty & then retire into the woodwork until after the election?
BTW - did anyone hear the rumor that Karl Rove sexually abuses small barnyard animals? (Just kidding! But spread it around anyway.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. Staffers are expendible. Just ask Katherine Harris.



They know that going in that they might have to take a bullet for their boss.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bad ,bad, Mr. Lankford now here is your pay raise
We disciplined him really really good...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skiddlybop Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Just "Inappropriate" or UNTRUE?
The Republicans have irretrievably TAINTED this election and the ONLY HONORABLE WAY for them to indicate contrition is to WITHDRAW the Republican candidate entirely and CONCEDE the election to Strickland.

That's what they did to Gore and Kerry. The Republican candidate can ONLY prove that he's a patriotic American by WITHDRAWING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MallRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. All right. Someone explain to me why Strickland can't sue for defamation?
Why don't ANY Swiftboated candidates ever sue for defamation? We're long past the days of "you don't want to look like a sore loser."

Pin these fuckers to the wall.

-MR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think because he is a public figure rather than a private citizen, the
rules pertaining to libel/slander/defamation are different. When you are a public figure, there is no such thing as slander or libel against you - people calling you names and telling lies about you goes with the territory.

As distasteful as this seems, this is what allows you and me to call Bush and his buddies whatever we want to, and float rumors about them, without any fear of a slander/libel suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. That's right
He would be considered a "public official," thus considerably raising the bar on any libel/slander suit -- the burden of proof would be very difficult to meet.

I just hope this doesn't dog Strickland for the rest of the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. I just find it fascinating that people condemn this, yet it's ok to say
a Republican is gay.

It's the Hypocrisy!™
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. This kinda makes me wonder about something: Bear with me here
If a gay man marries a lesbian (I can't imagine this has -never- happened, for
possibly economic or other reasons), wouldn't that be a legal "gay marriage"?

Obviously I don't know or care whether Strickland and/or his wife are gay, my concern is simply that such a marriage would be perfectly legal, nu?

Maybe I'm just nuttier than usual today...if this post is out of line, just let me know.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Info on Gary Lankford
Family Vision
"As a youth pastor, I have always appreciated the perspective that Gary has on life and on training young people. He is excited about giving young people the tools they need to make a lasting impact for Christ. Gary has a passion for young people to see life through a Christian worldview. Not only does he have the knowledge base needed to educate others, he has the ability to communicate it in a relevant, helpful, and engaging way. And he practices what he preaches. Gary has made it a priority to train his own children to be leaders."

~ Mike Borst, Youth Pastor, Heritage Christian Church, Ohio

* * * *
He is reported as a Christian home school headmaster
Also founder and president of Family Vision

* * * *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MLM Liberal Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. This wasn't Gary Lankford's first e-mail controversy
Ask members of Ohioans for Concealed Carry.

The following e-mail was sent by Lankford to a member of that organization. It was pulled from all places posted, except for one spot on its message board:

Greg,

. . .

Some public facilities also have restrictions on concealed carry. I'm not sure why you believe every candidate and legislator that supports 2nd Amendment rights may only have their offices in buildings that allow concealed carry. And does that mean legislators, judges, and executive branch members should boycott work if the public buildings they work in don't allow concealed carry? I am guessing that is not your position. I would think you want elected officials to encourage and protect 2nd Amendment rights, rather than be limited by them.

. . .

Gary Lankford
Pro-Family Voters Coordinator
Ohioans for Blackwell

----------

Here's part of the response from one member of Ohioans for Concealed Carry when Lankford wrote again calling for removal of the message from the organization's message board:

Gary:

Thanks for the rapid response....

I can understand your position on the privacy of your comments to Greg, however, even if you specifically told him that the message was private, you have to remember that you are, in essence, a spokesperson for a very public organization. The disclaimer that your comments don't reflect the candidates opinions just doesn't work.

I'm not going to post your response to my message. You seem to be unwilling to let me do so. Fine.... However, I will summarize it as: "Mr. Lankford has indicated that his message to Greg ('Ursus') was supposed to be private and does not speak for Mr. Blackwell...." And post my response....

If somebody just screwed up, fine. Please fix it....

---------

Apparently, a home school administrator like Gary Lankford didn't learn his lesson here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MLM Liberal Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Time to Swift Boat the REAL source of Strickland e-mail flap
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 02:33 AM by MLM Liberal
Reports have circulated that Gary Lankford, who was fired by the Ohio Republican Party for an e-mail suggesting Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ted Strickland and his wife were gay, based that e-mail on a posting made in a blog by Scott Pullins, President of the Ohio Taxpayers Association. For this reason, Blogger has been notified of Pullins' blog containing objectionable content.

It's time that Scott Pullins be swift-boated, and it can be done very easily by making the connection between Pullins and the 2004 suicide of a Columbus city worker and Army Veteran named Brandon Ratliff.

The following is from a posting in Ratliff's memory:

Lt. Brandon Ratliff

He commanded the Army Reserve's 909th Forward Surgical Team in Afghanistan. The unit he commanded provides medical care on the front lines, and Ratliff's duties included retrieving wounded soldiers from the battlefield and tallying the dead and wounded. Ratliff spent nine months in Afghanistan organizing the medical unit and, when he had to, picking up and carrying soldiers broken by helicopter crashes and land mines. He did his duty. He was decorated eight times. Upon returning home from the war, Ratliff was denied the promotion and pay raise he was promised by his employer before he was deployed. Depressed from his experiences on active duty, hopelessness set in, and on Thursday, March 18, 2004, Lt. Ratliff committed suicide.

Lt. Ratliff graduated from Groveport Madison High School in 1992 and received a Bachelors Degree in Health Administration from Franklin University in 2000. He was an employee of the Columbus Department of Health as a STD Intervention Specialist. He was committed to helping people and was a highly respected and greatly loved member of his family, community, and country. He is beloved and survived by his mother, father, stepfather, grandmother, uncles and aunts, many other family members; best friend, and countless other friends, comrades, and co-workers.

Lieutenant Brandon Ratliff

"I am sorry they failed you, Mom"
02 April 2004

LIEUTENANT BRANDON L RATLIFF

"SERVED IN AFGHANISTAN OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM ONLY TO COME HOME AND FIGHT ANOTHER BATTLE WITH THE JOB HE LEFT BEHIND. MAY HE REST IN PEACE AND LET HIM KNOW HE IS MUCH LOVED AND MISSED. I WILL JOIN YOU SON."
31 Mar 2004

Lt. Brandon Ratliff

"A great friend and a selfless person. May you find peace and know how much we all miss you."
03 April 2004

Dear Friends, Not to get political on ya'll, but please, if you are fortunate enough to have a veteran in your life, take a minute to let them know how much you love and appreciate them.

I am saddened and ashamed to tell about my friend, co-worker, and American hero, Brandon Ratliff, who gave until he had no more left to give.

In civilian life he served the poor in the local health department and in the military, he carried a stretcher around the Afghan hills sometimes only retrieving pieces of comrades.

He was decorated 8 times in 9 months. He had only been back home 5 months before taking his life. He was 31, a college grad, charming and a real magnet to the opposite sex.

He was a human that I could look to for inspiration, knowing I could never rise to his level, but always being inspired by his example.

It took his tragic passing for me to understand what it means when it is said, "some gave all." Thank a veteran for serving our country. Please let the reception the veterans of Vietnam received be a lesson to us now. God bless and keep you all. Thank you for letting me share this with you. - Scott
04 April 2004

------------
In a report issued by Mayor Michael Coleman on April 22, 2004, the City of Columbus noted what could have been done on its part to prevent Lieutenant Ratliff's suicide.

However, I have always placed full responsibility for Ratliff's death on Scott Pullins.

And it all stems from his involvement in a misleading ad campaign opposing a $4-a-day tax on car rentals in Columbus, which was on the November 2002 ballot as Issue 18. The article from Business First spells it all out:

Anti-rental tax ads begin airing
October 23, 2002
by Tony Goins
Business First

The Ohio Taxpayers Association has unveiled television and radio ads to fight Issue 18, a car rental tax that will be on the Nov. 5 ballot in Columbus.

The association is spending $35,000 on radio ads and $60,000 on TV ads. A single ad has been created for each medium.

The ads urge taxpayers to vote down a $4-a-day tax on car rentals within the city of Columbus. Columbus City Council approved the tax in June, but the OTA and a consortium of car rental companies successfully fought to have the issue put on the ballot.

A "yes" vote for Issue 18 will approve the tax. A "no" vote will prevent it from being enacted.

The ads have a "hard-hitting anti-tax message," said OTA Chairman Scott Pullins.

In a press release, the pro-Issue 18 campaign, Citizens for Columbus Neighborhoods, called the ads "misleading."

"They obviously weren't concerned with reality when they wrote these commercials, because every statement is off base with the issue on the ballot," said campaign coordinator Todd Dieffenderfer in the release. "We are very interested in seeing how they are funding this attack campaign."

Pro-Issue 18 campaigners have already aired one TV ad in support of the tax and plan to air another, said campaign member Peggy McElroy, a longtime community activist. McElroy said tax supporters plan to distribute campaign literature and make door-to-door appeals to win voter support for the tax, designed to help the city of Columbus overcome a budget crunch.

The association's TV ads, which began airing Wednesday on WBNS-TV, the Pax television network and cable channels, will run 90 times on 32 Wide Open West channels, and 90 times on 22 stations on the Time Warner and Insight cable systems. The association targeted the cable networks voters are likely to watch, including CNN, A&E and the History Channel.

"If you watch anything on cable this week, you'll see it." Pullins said.

The association has also purchased seven days of advertising on local Clear Channel radio stations, Pullins said, including WTVN-AM and WNCI-FM and WMNI-AM.

The radio ad will air most often on WTVN, about 60 times over seven days.

----------

And as J. Caleb Mozzocco reported in Columbus Alive:

On paper, Issue 18 looked like a sure thing. The cash-strapped city could raise at least $6 million a year by taxing residents of other cities, who would be paying a new $4 a day tax on car rentals when they visited Columbus. It’s the kind of tax already paid by visitors to dozens of other big cities.

Who wouldn’t vote to raise some other poor schmuck’s taxes to keep your own taxes low and your city services intact?

Apparently, 62 percent of Columbus voters. The issue was crushed at the polls last week.

But why on earth would anyone in Columbus—other than maybe the rental car industry—cast a “no” vote? Behold the power of advertising.

Scott Pullins of the Ohio Taxpayers Association successfully led an ad campaign which all but bludgeoned voters into voting no on 18. You remember the ads—some of the most alarmist and vague of the campaign season. Really, they were almost funny.

Like the TV spot that said Issue 18 would cost local jobs and Columbus taxpayers $12 million a year, as choruses of “Vote no on Issue 18” splashed across the screen. Or the radio ads that call it “a painful new tax on hard-working Columbus residents” that “will not help pay for fire and police departments.” Or the fliers jammed under your windshield wipers, which prominently featured a photo of Mayor Michael Coleman next to the “Issue #18 is Opposed By” heading without explanation (Coleman was, of course, the strongest advocate of the tax).

None of the ads ever got around to explaining what the heck the issue was. It was clear it was evil, but the fact that it was a tax on rental cars—which, according to the city and the ballot language, exempted most local users—never came up.

Pullins is unapologetic about the ads, and why not? “It wasn’t up to me to run the mayor’s campaign for him,” he said. “The burden was on them.”

“Frankly, we didn’t have enough money to get into all ,” Pullins continued. But couldn’t they even have mentioned that the “new tax” was a car-rental tax? “We had to make it as simple as possible. We were on the ‘no’ side; our purpose was to defeat the issue. To explain the issue is up to the ‘yes’ side. Our job was to convince to vote no.”

That they did, and Pullins calls the issue’s defeat “a huge victory for Columbus taxpayers.”

----------
But at what price, Scott Pullins? The life of an Army veteran who served our country and was affected greatly by the war that he would end up killing himself after learning the promotion he was promised wasn't there any more--thanks to your misleading the voters of Columbus?

The fallout of the campaign is reflected in the report from the City of Columbus following Ratliff's suicide:

As a result of significant revenue shortfalls, a number of City Departments were required to submit revised projections for the FY2002 budget. These projections further reduced cuts already made in many program areas necessitating, in some cases, the elimination of programs in their entirety.

The factors considered by the Health Commissioner and her team in deciding where additional cuts would be made included:

1) Whether the services were required by law
2) Are they fully funded by a revenue source
3) Are there other providers of the service in the community
4) Is there a critical need in the community for the service
5) Is the service part of the department's core mission

Based on these factors, in January 2003, funding for the Enviromental Community Partnerships programs was eliminated. This resulted in the elimination of two full-time positions, a Program Manager II and a Health Education Program Planner.

In January of 2003, the employee encumbering the HEPP position in the eliminated program was moved to the HEPP position that Lt. Ratliff was to have filled.

And all of this took place while Lt. Ratliff was fighting in Afghanistan.

----------

Some bloggers may have names for Scott Pullins following the Strickland flap. But I feel facts go a lot further than simple name-calling.

Scott Pullins has a reputation for being litigious. Which is why it helps to have a journalism degree from Kent State, where I attended classes and worked on the Daily Kent Stater with Columbus Dispatch reporter Mark Ferenchik, who covered the Ratliff story.

However, unlike Mark, I am not a professional journalist. I am a private citizen, currently employed with the state's top law enforcement agency. Many of my co-workers with the Ohio Department of Public Safety have been on the front lines in the War on Terror, just like Lt. Ratliff. Scott Pullins, on the other hand, is a public figure interviewed frequently by the news media. Any legal maneuver he would try to silence me is only going to lead to his accelerated demise from Ohio politics.

But I am willing to stick my neck out on behalf of Brandon Ratliff's family and friends, as well as my fellow citizens in Columbus and statewide, to expedite Scott Pullins' fall from the political arena. Brandon is owed at least that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC