Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Leadership Invokes "Martial Law" [on legislation!!!!]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 09:27 PM
Original message
House Leadership Invokes "Martial Law" [on legislation!!!!]
http://www.commondreams.org/cgi-bin/newsprint.cgi?file=/news2006/0728-13.htm

House Leadership Invokes "Martial Law," Forcing Members to Vote On Key Bills Without Full Knowledge of What They're Voting On


The House Republican Leadership has announced its intention to have the House vote, before adjourning on Friday or Saturday, on several major pieces of legislation that are not yet available to House members in final form because behind-closed-door negotiations on the proposals are still going on. The Leadership apparently intends to use a process known as “martial law” to allow these bills to be brought to the floor very shortly after negotiations are completed, with the result that Members of the House are likely to have virtually no time to examine and consider the details of the legislation before they will be required to vote on it.

Among the matters the House may be asked to vote on under martial law are a major conference report on pension legislation, a costly bill that would permanently reduce the estate tax and extend certain expiring tax provisions, and a bill that would combine a controversial health insurance proposal with an increase in the minimum wage. The House Rules Committee on Thursday afternoon reported a resolution that would provide martial law authority in relation to all of these bills.

Under the martial law procedure, longstanding House rules that require at least one day between the unveiling of significant legislation and the House floor vote on that legislation — so that Members can learn what they are being asked to vote on — are swept away. Instead, under “martial law,” the Leadership can file legislation with tens or hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and votes on it, before Members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted into the legislation behind closed doors. This is the procedure that the Leadership intends to use to muscle through important bills in the next two days.

-----

Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. We have to vote these bastards out of office
Democracy has been hijacked by a bunch of self-serving jerks. Honestly, this is enough to make you sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zreosumgame Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
49. this is why repukes wasted so much time
on funs, god and gays, so they could pull this slimey trcik now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anyone who does not vote NO! on principle is a stooge and
should be defeated. This dictatorship must be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, they should all vote no
and make a big deal out of what the repigs are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. But the law might be worded that a no vote gives the pukes what they want.
If they can't read it how do they know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Outrageous. I would refuse to vote, period.
this has got to stop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. This BS should be filibustered. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. House doesn't filibuster but they should just refuse to vote
Anyone that votes for legislation they have not read or has no knowledge of is not representing the people period...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. they CAN filly-buster, but they also have differnt rules
the leadership can put a stop to it immediately.

In the 1980s, there were several efforts to filibuster, and both sides decided that they had more effective ways of being bribed by lobbyists, so they unanimounsly agreed to the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. force them to use the sargent at arms to get a quorum.
everyone should stay in their offices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emald Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. this is so simple
just call the bluff, vote NO goddamit. Just vote NO. If you can't get the information before the vote than the vote has to be against. Simple, seems to me. Guess thats why i live in a cabin in alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. Exactly, just vote no
and scream why from the roof tops, press conferences, etc. This is total BS. When will someone stand up to these monsters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. It might be as dangerous to vote NO and end up with martial law anyway
If the unseen legislation is worded like something to this effect:

"It may be deemed irresponsible of this Congress, that the agency known as
The National Security Agency, not be empowered with full vesture of authority
to protect the security of the USA, would anyone then be opposed to Homeland Security's
use of their full power (including but not limited to martial law) prevent them from
protecting US citizens at home and abroad?

Yes? No?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The Demos CAN'T back down on this..but this could also be a trick..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. A trick?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You don't think the Demos were tricked into voting for the Iraqi War?
All of them, except Feingold, voted for <without reading> the Bill
to go to war with Iraq.

This is another deja vu moment. The Republicans stampeding the cattle
to vote on their unseen, unread, not up for discussion, Bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Surely the people can shut down the House.
March on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dems need to shut down the House and picket. That would make
the republicans look so bad they would never even be able to steal another election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Use this to our advantage...
Just have Conyers or Lewis "accidentally" slip Articles of Impeachment for Bush and Cheney into the middle of that estate tax cut bill before it goes to the printers...

Oh dear...every Republican member of the House just voted to impeach the president....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pierre.Suave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
BEST IDEA EVER, DO IT!!!!!!!

I want that to happen now!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Thing is, Conyers voted for the Pension bill
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why Is So Much Behind Closed Doors?
Why aren't our reps seething that they can't even find out what is going down? Why isn't this screaming headlines across the nation?Bush talks FREEDOM and OUR LEGAL PROCESS yet this under-the-table kind of dealing does not sound at all legal and gives our reps no time to argue this issues before vote time. What are they trying to pull on us this time??????????? What IS tucked inside these bills they don't want us to know about until its too late?:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Dontcha know??? National Security reasons! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. They do it because they CAN. To hell with the law and decency.
And parliamentary rules of order.

They vote, act and live like they will never be out of power.

So far, they have been "correct" in their behavior - they're still in cotrol, in spite of all efforts to the contrary.

I wonder how they'll react IF and when they're out?!

I can just hear their self-righteous indignation now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. DAMN!!!! 76 of the Dems voted for the pension bill sight unseen
They voted for it without even know what was in it.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll422.xml

I'm convinced the Dems really don't want to be the majority party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliceWonderland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Exactly. How hilarious that folks here are outraged at Repubs
when Dems are just bending over and saying, please sir, I want some more.

Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. My Nita voted no. Love her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
30. Hell
with the exception of Russ Feingold, NO ONE read the freakin' Patriot Act before voting for it!

Editor’s note: In an address given October 12, 2001, to the Associated Press Managing Editors Conference at the Milwaukee Art Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Sen. Feingold (D-Wis) explained why
Text he, alone among United States Senators, Text (emphasis mine) voted against the Administration-sponsored “U.S.A. Patriot” Act. The text below followed his introductory remarks.
http://www.archipelago.org/vol6-2/feingold.htm
I cannot believe people are not in the streets! GAWD forgive me but I hate these people :mad:

Jenn sorry for all of the bold...I am somewhat technically challenged :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Flipping through
the channels and stopped to watch some of the House debate on the minimum wage bill. The one the Repukes subverted with more tax cuts for top 2%, it's unbelievable. I can't believe some of complete nonsense and crap coming out of the mouths of those people. They stand up there and speak complete gibberish then have the nerve to accuse the Dem's of not being serious about increasing the minimum wage because they don't want to include their tax cut for the wealthiest 2% in the bill. If ever there was a time when the Dem's need to take back the House and Senate, it's now, I just hope enough voters hit the polls in November to get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-28-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. that is utter madness
ya just know they'll have snuck some real scary stuff into those bills. for example, a little provision stating that bush has 'permission' to attack iran, or a blanket immunity for any bush crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. kinda like how the USA Patriot Act got passed . . .
no one in Congress could possibly have had time to read it before the votes . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
22. it's a sign of desperation
repubs are trying to cram all their eggs in the basket for campaign season
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
23. My Gawd-what in the HELL are these nutjobs up to now???!!!
:scared:

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. And this is "democracy" how?
Stop fooling yourself, America...a democratic nation you ain't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. Insanity.
Good god. That is terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. www.congress.gov Go write your congressperson NOW!
This is total BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
32. You don't have to read the bills to know the intent of them.
If the bills were good for people the repukes would not be in such a hurry to pass them. Also if it is a repuke bill is hurts working class people and rewards the wealthy and corporations. Anyone knows repukes do not do things to make life better for most of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
33. Demcracy is action. As Chimpy says, "Other countries envy our 'freeDOM.'
...so life goes in "Alice's" rabbit-hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Well, I sure this will be fully reported by the MSM...
...or Not.

Unbelievable.:banghead: :mad: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. What country is this again?
There must be some really powerful shifts going on the the tectonic plates, because I keep waking up thinking I'm someplace else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
37. I cannot believe how un-American these repukes are.
This is a dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
38. Simple response to such fascist tactics: vote against such legislation
Edited on Sat Jul-29-06 01:18 PM by Seabiscuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
outofbounds Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. If ever there was a time
for democrats to unify now would it. Put the infighting on the back burner and refuse to vote. The media coverage of that would certainly allow the nation to see democracy being subverted. I would think this alone would be one hell of an campaign issue for dems as a whole. Its time for a Tea Party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
40. And guess what, because of the middle east distraction they will get away
with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. In addition to "Yea", "Nay", or "present", a vote of "in protest"
should be introduced ... for use whenever the Senator or Rep feels that the legislation is something so underhanded or coercive that it is violating the legitimate voting procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
43. I hate these motherfuckers...
:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. If our dem reps were true patriots, they'd not show up for this BS.
Sadly, I'm feeling there's less and less difference between the dems and repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. Vote, NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reckon Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
48. What this law really means is
all they would have to do is MAKE CLAIMS of ties and NEVER have to prove it to anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
50. F'ing Repukes have been doing this all along
John Dean covers this procedure in his new book "Conservatives without Conscience" which everyone needs to read.

It's a f'ing dictatorship we're under in all 3 branches of government now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC