I guess the threat-level "scare you into submission" B.S. has gone global...
Pitfalls seen as UK copies US terror alert model
By Mark Trevelyan, Security Correspondent Mon Jul 31, 8:28 AM ET
BERLIN (Reuters) - Britain's launch of a U.S.-style terrorism alert system will address concerns about lack of transparency but must avoid the pitfalls of "crying wolf" or being seen as a political tool, international experience shows.
ADVERTISEMENT
British authorities will on Tuesday introduce a five-layered threat system to inform the public, with levels ranging from low (attack unlikely) to critical (attack expected imminently).
It closely resembles the scheme in the United States, which since its launch in March 2002 has been set at yellow (elevated) -- the third of five levels -- apart from seven episodes ranging in length from 10 to 101 days when it has climbed to the second level, orange (high).
A comparable four-grade system in Australia has remained unchanged at the third level, medium -- "terrorist attack could occur" -- since its introduction in June 2003.
Varying the level too often can be seen as crying wolf and lead to "threat fatigue" and public cynicism. That may help explain why the United States, after four raised alerts in 2003, issued just one each in 2004 and 2005 and none so far this year. The last one came after the London bombings of July 2005.
On the other hand, leaving the warning constant can also invite criticism of governments.
"The government is a little bit caught, because clearly the level of threat has increased since the involvement in Iraq, but of course they're not admitting to that," said Clive Williams, security analyst at Australia's Macquarie University, referring to his country's troop presence in the Middle East.
The rest is at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060731/ts_nm/security_alert_dc