Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyers Say Many Left Out of Tax Refund (class action suit)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 09:22 AM
Original message
Lawyers Say Many Left Out of Tax Refund (class action suit)

Full story: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20060805/D8J9VK780.html

Lawyers Say Many Left Out of Tax Refund
Email this Story

Aug 4, 9:52 PM (ET)

By PETE YOST

WASHINGTON (AP) - Millions of small businesses and low-income taxpayers will be shortchanged or excluded altogether from a Bush administration tax refund program, lawyers who have filed a class-action lawsuit in the controversy said Friday.

The criticism comes amid a Treasury Department plan in which the public stopped paying a 3 percent federal excise tax on long-distance phone calls as of July 31. The tax collected by phone service providers had been levied without congressional authorization.

The government says taxpayers can get back the last three years of the excise tax payments by asking for the money on their 2006 tax returns. The Treasury Department said recently that $13 billion will be refunded, but it provided no estimates of how much the average phone customer might receive.

Many senior citizens and other phone customers will get no refund because their income is so low that they don't have to file tax returns. A study by the nonprofit Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found more than 10 million households will be left out of the tax rebate program.

"Since I do not file a tax return, it does not seem right that I am expected to fill out a tax return because of what someone else took from me illegally," James Gillis, 78, stated in a declaration in the lawsuit.

The IRS said it is developing a "very simple, straightforward form" for low-income people to file next year to get a refund.

"We recognize there are many people who have no filing requirements and we want to make sure that these people get the refund they deserve," the IRS said in a statement.

Attorneys in the class-action suit filed in U.S. District Court in Washington say consumers ought to be entitled to refunds covering most of the past decade, not just the past three years. A study by Congressional Research Service estimated that $6 billion a year had been collected from the long-distance phone customers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. tax collected by private companies WITHOUT congressional authorization!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. But my question is ... The companies collected the money ...
... but did they ever forward it to the government? Are we *sure* the money was paid to the government?

Otherwise, we're just paying ourselves, and the phone companies walk away with a nice little bonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm
No congressional authorization.
Does this President understand what the hell he is doing.
This is blantant.
Gee all asleep
Wonder what other turd floating around to be uncovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. careful. this tax has been going on for decades:


The tax has been levied for decades, dating back to when long-distance phone charges were based on time and distances of the calls. Many companies long ago dropped the distance factor and began charging a flat per-minute rate. The government continued to collect the tax, even though Congress had not amended the tax law to reflect the change in long-distance charges.

Large businesses started filing lawsuits, winning favorable court decisions. In May, the government stopped fighting the lawsuits, and the Internal Revenue Service issued the refund rule without seeking public comment.

"They met illegally behind closed doors and the refund is only a fraction of what the government took," said Jonathan Cuneo, a lead attorney in the class-action case that the Bush administration is asking the court to dismiss.

Small businesses that lack the time or money to collect the last three years of their phone bills will be forced to rely on an IRS formula that is likely to shortchange recipients, said Cuneo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. hey
thanks. Oooops my my me bad
Like me caught with foot in mouth look :rofl: :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "without seeking public comment"
Read: without notifying the public of the change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Tax was levied to pay for the Spanish-American war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R. Everybody needs to see this one.
I hope this one gets some coverage. Kinda makes you consider just how much the corporations and the federal government are getting by with in this country--don't you think?

Remind me again--Wasn't it the Patriots who were all pissed off about taxation just before the Boston Tea Party? Oh yeah--NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION was how that went--RIGHT?



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Totally. And woah. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-05-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. What is the formula
for allowing what one will receive. Will it be based on your income how much you finally get, or will each person get a set amount. I have not saved my phone bills these past three years, so what happens if we are expected to prove we spent money on long distance calls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC