Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Veterans) Group: Bush can reinstate the draft, or lose the Iraq War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:00 AM
Original message
(Veterans) Group: Bush can reinstate the draft, or lose the Iraq War
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 11:11 AM by Barrett808
Group: Bush can reinstate the draft, or lose the Iraq War
Michael Roston

Fast on the heels of yesterday's Defense Department involuntary call up of Marine reserves, an Iraq veterans group tells RAW STORY that if a draft is not the next step, President Bush must choose to accept a loss in the war.

Reports yesterday indicated that 2,500 inactive reserve members of the Marines were called up for duty in Iraq. The Marines are members of the individual Ready Reserve and have already given four years of service, allowing them to return to civilian life. However, they are contractually obligated to return to service when needed.

But Jon Soltz, who heads up the group VoteVets.org, warned ABC News yesterday that the call up showed a lack of plans for victory in Iraq, and the problems faced by an overburdened American military. Soltz served as a captain in the Army in the Iraq war and is still a member of the reserves.

...

"The Pentagon has been saying it's meeting retention goals, but its actions speak louder than words," he explained of the stop loss and reserve call up actions that the Pentagon has taken.

For President Bush, Soltz explained, there is a simple choice: "They have to decide between drafting people and cutting and running because either way they have a big problem. 130,000 was never enough, but you cannot sustain force levels where they are. Those are their options."

(more)

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Group_Bush_can_reinstate_draft_or_0823.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reinstating the draft AND losing the war in Iraq
seems like a strong possibility, too. Having a draft certainly didn't keep freedom on the march in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Reinstating the draft may bring an end to American militarism
It is easy to be gung ho when it is not one's ass that is on the line. I want to see all of those college Republicans in uniform in Baghdad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Goody now we can march, trash stores and burn cars in the streets
Ah the GOOD OLD DAYS are about to return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I hope they return the draft
America needs a good kick in the pants for voting that idiot in the 2nd time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. They're getting a damn good ass kicking.......
'Tis been said that "We deserve the type of government we have!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sin Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Screw the Cars.
I say we head for the Capitol buildings and the bastards that put us in this spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. With pitchforks and torches!
Or maybe tar and feathers. Let's go get them bastards! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. I can't wait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Do we get to smoke pot? I think I am a little old for that now but
I am with you on the rest of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeyJones Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. I agree
"It is easy to be gung ho when it is not one's ass that is on the line. I want to see all of those college Republicans in uniform in Baghdad."

Let's make sure they're the first ones on the battle front and make sure they don't get sweetheart deployments to Tokyo or Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Amen
...to that. Something tells me that more than a few Yellow Elephants will do a 180 with their rah-rah war crap when the draft is reinstated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyrone Slothrop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. All depends what we do with the troops once they're there
The Iraq debacle probably wouldn't have gone nearly as badly had we used our troops to build infrastructure and what-not rather than just sitting around Baghdad guarding the Ministry of Oil.

You can't win the hearts and minds unless you make folks' lives demonstrably better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. Of course, the invasion would still have been illegal and unnecessary.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wake up with this every morning
I have been out of service since 1972 but I am eligible for 6 more years.

Will they take the rest of us old SF guys before reinstating the draft?

That is why I would support a draft. Pure selfishness. I am too creaky to fight again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. i support a draft as well.
i went through the looking glass on this one.

but i also think that there are loopholes that need to be closed -- and i think they need open areas for service like the peace corps.

my point is -- rich boys and girls need to do something as well.

no escape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's the entire and phony war on terror that is at stake
"What it really tells you is that the Bush administration is not dedicated to democratization, they will cut and run, because the political liabilities of having a state that is Iran's proxy aren't as bad as losing political power in the midterm election." He added, "Doing a draft would cause that."

We are on the verge of losing in Afghanistan, so cutting and running in Iraq will not end there.

I would like to know what literature is out there on the long term psychological effects to a military engaged in endless wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. For starters IndianaGreen, I'd recommend The Oxford Companion to
American Military History ed. John Whiteclay Chambers II. It contains several articles on combat trauma, battlefield aggression and violence, training and indoctrination, etc. Plus it cites many follow up sources.

And yes it is a phony war. Terror attacks are a crime, not a war. They should be countered with police, not soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. And until we illegally invaded, there were no terrorist attacks...
...from Iraq directed at us, so it's even more phony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think the draft is still a long way off.
I think every serviceperson signs a contract that says somewhere "details of contract may change without notice."

There are several million trained veterans in this country who think that they are now ineligible or have completed their terms of service, but that ain't necessarily so. The ones already in there are going to be used up until they're dead, insane, or too shot up to move and when they start running out of those the regulations will magically change to encompass the ones who thought they got away safely. Women will be allowed to get closer and closer to the front. Joining the Coast Guard might be construed as permission to be transferred to the Army as a combat infantryman. And as other options are cut off for young people by our contracting economy, there will always be an influx of volunteers who can never leave once they're in.

And seriously, when has the law or moral imperative stopped these guys anyway? Why recreate the draft when they can create a covert draft that doesn't earn the name? That's way more in keeping with their style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I doubt that it'll happen, myself, except in extreme emergency.
The Republicans are in such a politically desperate situation that reinstituting the draft would destroy them. That's not in the cards when their numero-uno goal is to retain as much power as is possible.

They've gotten away with as much as they have because the population is kept ignorant. Our "journalists" focus on missing rich girls and show trials, rather than the real goings-on in the world. People would probably be a whole lot more vocal if our reporters actually did their jobs.

When current events start to effect the common man in a deeply personal way - like forcing their children to go to fight - then things change. You can't blind people to the truth when their kids are being sent to get shot at or to return mentally traumatized. Many people out there just plain aren't fit for military service. I know that I'm not, mentally or health-wise.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I place the blame more on editors and owners
In general, the reporters get the goods. They can't help it if their stories get spiked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yep, a draft is political suicide.
And the Republicans know it. The only way we'll have a draft is if there is a high degree of public support for it. Heaven help us if that comes to pass, because some pretty awful shit would have to happen before that support was forthcoming.

Also, I dispute that there is a military solution to the mess that Bush has made of Iraq. Without a political solution that the Sunnis will accept, there will be no end to the violence. The whole premise of "winning" the war in Iraq is wrong to begin with. There will be no final "victory" of the sort that you can point to and say "we won."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. sounds like lose lose for the monkey n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. I want the draft reinstated...
putting these young punk-ass republicans on the line will get their attention. They can no longer just set back and watch shock and awe on the TV. In fact, if we're in this great War on Terrorism, why isn't there a draft?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garywild Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. They will run out of those soon
It is a draft by a different name or I guess yet another lie. Someone should give Canada a heads up on their border crossing profiles. look for americans with crew cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Venmkan Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Nooo! No locking down the Canadian border!
If the draft comes back, I'm gonna head north and see if Iverglas can rent me a room or something... :hide:

It could be "Odd Couple - The Next Generation!" :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Emailed McCain shortly after this fiasco began
Asked the Senator "Why if we were at war, as he and the pResident were claiming, there was no draft, no surtax to put the war on a pay-as-you-go basis and no anti-profiteering laws?", never received any reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fuck That!
NO DRAFT!:argh:

Any of us who have teenage kids will just say NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bush is annihilating our military. He should re-instate the draft, if
he is too stupid to withdraw, but he won't. He's too stupid to do anything right ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. Jebeesus! - THEY ALREADY LOST THE WAR! - sure, they are still there,
.
.
.

But who the heck are they fighting?

Saddam and his military are long gone

We are being side-tracked from the fact that the Military is successfully building over a dozen bases in Iraq ahead of schedule, while infrastructure remains damaged from the excessive bombings, hospitals and schools are not on schedule, and of course personal dwellings destroyed in raids and bombings remain just that - destroyed.

The PNACers are just setting up bases for a jump-start to dominate the Eastern Hemisphere - troops are just cannon fodder to distract attention from what the USA is REALLY doing in Iraq - making it a stronghold on the European continent

Hey

Didn't "America the Free" start out as people wanting to get OFF the European Continent?

Hmmmmmmm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. A Draft? Hah!
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 07:36 PM by Anakin Skywalker
Only if there's a way to guarantee that 50/50 across the economic spectrum. Keep in mind that back in the Vietnam era draft, rich, sheltered @$$holes like Shrub and Little Dick Cheney got away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeyJones Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Let him re-instate the draft and watch me, along with millions of......
others gladly burn our cards and walk into prison in proud defiance of this corporate war. Not to mention a draft is political suicide and massive recall elections will remove the Republicans from control of Congress and the presidency and give the Democrats solid control over both the House and Senate. Dubya and Cheney both will be impeached and tried and quite possibly imprisoned and it will be the death of the Republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Welcome to DU, Mikey!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. They could try an advertising blitz like the Aussies.
Advertising blitz to bolster armed forces recruitment
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200608/s1723614.htm

snip>

In order to attract the numbers, Defence Minister Brendan Nelson has pledged to increase advertising spending by 50 per cent.

A new campaign that will be rolled out before the end of the year.

"Advertising is in itself not the solution but it is a significant part of it," Dr Nelson said.

He says the Government is looking at ways to make people stay longer in the armed forces.

"The advertising I think needs to be focussed much more on the services," he said.

"People join the Army, the Air Force or the Navy, they don't join the ADF - and in addition to that much more of our advertising needs to be designed by young people for young people."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. JON STOLZ FOR PRESIDENT!!!
For President Bush, Soltz explained, there is a simple choice: "They have to decide between drafting people and cutting and running because either way they have a big problem. 130,000 was never enough, but you cannot sustain force levels where they are. Those are their options."

How wonderfully astute of Mr. Scholz to realize that President Mightymouse's real problem is that he did his cutting and running three years ago: he ignored explicit advice that he'd have to at least double his available troop strength if he wanted to liberate Iraq properly. Back then is when he should have instituted a draft. Political suicide? Certainly--but war is all about sacrifice, and if the commander-in-chief wasn't willing to gamble his future on such an obviously noble cause, who should be? :eyes:

Bush's other mistake has been in allowing anyone who disagrees with him on Iraq to be considered a "cut-and-runner." That limits his ability to get out of Iraq gracefully, the way Lyndon Baines Johnson was able to define the retreat from Viet Nam as "peace with honor." Bush is between a rock and hard place indeed, but only partly because a draft would be so unpopular. For Bush, a draft would also be tantamount to shouldering yet another of his miserable failures.


:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC