Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outsourcing seen boosting wages at home: study

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:19 PM
Original message
Outsourcing seen boosting wages at home: study
Here's some classic Ivory Tower bullshit for ya:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060825/us_nm/economy_productivity_dc

notice it doesn't say how or why or offer any proof...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep just like the new PTSD study all bull
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I smell something ... kinda smells like bullshit
Wages were down for workers last year.

But they were up for the working poor.

Can you smell it too?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I detect two distinct odors.
First is the pungent discussion of a need for a "new paradigm". When people start talking about "new paradigms" you can be reasonably sure that they're bullshitting you.

Secondly is this gem:

They presented evidence that the productivity effect had helped raise real wages for the least skilled among U.S. blue collar workers -- those who do jobs most likely to be shipped overseas -- by about a quarter of a percent per year between 1997 and 2004.

So they're saying that by shipping low-skill blue collar jobs overseas to exploit low wages we get to keep low-skill blue collar jobs here and increase wages. This doesn't make any sense. Why don't companies offshore these other jobs which are "likely to be shipped overseas"? If a company is trying to minimize labor costs, isn't it pretty stupid to give pay raises for jobs which can easily be shipped overseas for lesser wages? Perhaps this is part of the new paradigm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Makes good sense to me!!
'Tis like saying that Sexual Transmitted Diseases enhance the immune system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer99 Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. this study might sooth the "morals" of those that own the means
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 11:36 PM by Stargazer99
of production...but members on this board aren't fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, outsourcing helps unskilled workers-- apparently by....
MAGIC! Because no reasonable explanation is made. People whose jobs were outsourced are now doing... well, nothing! But somehow they're earning more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. BULLSHIT! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. BS. Call Center pay is a perfect example...
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 01:18 AM by Union Thug
Working in a call center doing tech support for MindSpring paid $12/hour to start (about 8 years ago), plus good benefits (stock, health, vaca). When outsourcing became common (about the time of the EarthLink merger), wages fell to around $8.50/hour with major cuts in benefits packages.

So, where's the boost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. The word "neoliberal" comes to mind while reading this article
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 01:42 AM by brentspeak
I'd like to see a duplicate economics study performed by these same two neolib economists, but with an added control: before the study commences, they'll both be informed their positions at Princeton will be terminated at the end of the year, and turned over to Indian economists who they'll also have to train re. course teaching and various duties.

I wonder what the results of their study will be like then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. Must be the work of the magical freedom trade fairy. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. in other news
chocolate rations were increased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorbal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think they want to push everyone into working in hospitals
Hospitals are desperately understaffed, and they can't yet make robots that do patient care or give meds. Unfortunately they also can't train people fast enough. (perhaps an excuse becasue they can't afford them)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. ...
:eyes: selling the american public a bag of raw sewage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. yea, maybe the ceo's income but that's about all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Bingo! Comparing mean to median income illustrates this clearly:
From 1993-2003, US median household income fell by over 3.5%, from $44,968 to $43,318; there were similar declines in all but a handful of states. Per capita income, over approximately the same period, rose by about 4%. Real wages have been falling, so the surplus is going to the rich.

Median Household Income in 2003 Constant Dollars
http://www.ssti.org/Digest/Tables/120505t.htm

Change in Per Capita Income by State: 1999-2004
http://www.ssti.org/Digest/Tables/040405t.htm


Published on Wednesday, May 11, 2005 by the Financial Times
Real Wages Fall at Fastest Rate in 14 Years
by Christopher Swann in Washington

Real wages in the US are falling at their fastest rate in 14 years, according to data surveyed by the Financial Times.

Inflation rose 3.1 per cent in the year to March but salaries climbed just 2.4 per cent, according to the Employment Cost Index. In the final three months of 2004, real wages fell by 0.9 per cent.

The last time salaries fell this steeply was at the start of 1991, when real wages declined by 1.1 per cent. http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0511-08.htm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. good job with the stats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Pretty Obvious
If you increase the number of manager per US worker the average income of those still with a job goes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. How to lie with statistics 101
10 jobs: 1 pays $10/hr, 9 pay $6/hr. Ave wage: $6.40/hr

Outsource the 9 low-wage jobs. Ave wage (for the remaining job): $10/hr.

See, its easy to show that outsourcing raises average wages.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thank you, Mass! I couldn't have said it simpler. When oh when
will we get rid of these lying bastards??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Outsourcing seen boosting wages at home"
My ass. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. Studies show cigarette smoking not addictive. Just depends on who is
paying for the study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Since when does increased productivity benefit the workers?
The extra cash goes to the stockholders, not the workers. Even if their numbers are correct, how the hell can they expect us to think 1/4 of a percentage increase in wages makes up for millions put out of work? What a crock of shit! I notice the article doesn't quote any opposing views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Exactly right! The definition of increased productivity means more
work was done without additional pay. Working harder for the same or less. Increased bottom line for the company? Sure. Although over time, who will BUY their stuff? Then watch that bottom line! Come out into the real world, guys, and live like the rest of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. What the hell they been smoking?
I would to have some...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. A new spin on one of favorite old lines
That idea is so idiotic only an intellectual could have thought of it. -- Churchill

That study is so counter-intuitive that only a "think tank" could be responsible for it. -- Jack Rabbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. Unadulterted BS
Retirement benefits out the window, stagnated minimum wage, healthcare unaffordable or non existent, inflation on the rampage, unavailable middle class jobs, unaffordable housing. Economic experts my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
27. +.25%/yr from 97-04 for LOWEST PAID WORKERS -- ie min wage srvc sector
Edited on Sun Aug-27-06 09:47 AM by 1932
jods.

If that isn't adjusted for inflation, that's a terrible number. And what does globalization have to do with minimum wage jobs? It's killing the middle class by turning the US into a service sector economy, that doesn't produce anything of value allowing a middle class to form from work that adds value along the path of production, but creates a two-tier economy of super-rich CEOs and the un-uniionized people who flip their burgers and mow their lawns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why are you so surprised? REUTERS is Globalist...
Associated Press is a little better...but still corporate.

Personally, the way this article has been written, sounds like confusing bullshit. Unskilled blue collar workers...have faired well? Hmmmm. Younger, willing to work longer hours without overtime pay, willing to take less in benefits and medical insurance? Could we have the statistics of skilled blue collar workers who held their job for years, had insurance and retirement benefits and got the boot?

The best sources would be state by state statistics. Socialist Party tries to stay informed, by including foreign and domestic labor statistics. No white collar unions means we have no reliable statistics.

REUTERS...GO SUCK AN EGG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. Neo-Liberal BS
Neo-Classical Economics is a fucking religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
30. "cheaper transportation"? When was their study conducted? Pre-2001?
Have they not noticed the increase in energy prices (which affect those transportation costs)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Every business rewards increased productivity with higher wages,
right? Or I guess these idiots are assuming so. It sounds just like the "as taxes go down, government revenues increase" crowd.

How can Reuters publish a press release like this? It's so obvious. Don't any of these writers have editors to filter this shit out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. The brief Reuters story seems to be putting emphasis on a minor point.
Grossman's main point is the shifting paradigm in international trade theory. As one of the leading international trade economists I think he's motivated by advancing his discipline, not shilling for a right-wing agenda.

For those of you here who are economists and would like to read more on it, this appears to be the working paper presented at the Federal Reserve:

http://www.princeton.edu/%7Egrossman/offshoring.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. WAIT! What?... "by about a quarter of a percent per yr 1997-2004" ?!?
snip...
"They presented evidence that the productivity effect had helped raise real wages for the least skilled among U.S. blue collar workers -- those who do jobs most likely to be shipped overseas -- by about a quarter of a percent per year between 1997 and 2004."

And they're claiming this as a GOOD THING????
And they're getting away with it???????

So how much did the CEOs and management wages increase during that same time period?!!!!!

These people need to be called out on this bullshit.

Is it ME???????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC