Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Starr appeals 'Bong Hits 4 Jesus' case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:29 PM
Original message
Starr appeals 'Bong Hits 4 Jesus' case
JUNEAU, Alaska - Former Whitewater special counsel Kenneth Starr petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to take up Alaska's "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, a dispute involving a high school student, a banner and a tough school policy.

Starr, who gained national prominence while investigating former President Clinton's Whitewater land deal and relationship with Monica Lewinsky, filed the petition Monday on behalf of the Juneau School District in response to a March ruling by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The appeals court sided with a high school student who displayed a banner reading "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" during an Olympic torch relay in 2002. It ruled former Juneau-Douglas High School principal Deborah Morse violated former student Joseph Frederick's free speech rights.

The U.S. Supreme Court petition must receive a minimum of four of the nine justices' votes to be heard.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060829/ap_on_re_us/bong_hits4_jesus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. When I had a bong (years ago) my hits were for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anything to get his ugly mug back in the news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bruce McAuley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lessee here...
One bong hit 4 Jesus......
One 4 ME.....
One more 4 Jesus.....
One more 4 me....
Whew!
Hard work!
But somebody's gotta do it....
:bounce:

Bruce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xeric Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. He must think he's got the votes
Starr is one of the biggest assholes on the planet, but he isn't stupid. He knows exactly how to play the system. If he's going ahead with this he must be pretty sure he can win.
I find the vision of law that he and the Scalias and Borks have (I call it Borkian logic) beneath contempt. It's the idea that law is like a cutesy little game you play, that it doesn't matter if justice is involved, it just matters if you win. This kind of Machiavellian view of the legal system is what could potentially destroy that system and with it the whole idea of equal justice. This man politicized his position as a special prosecutor just as Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas politicized their positions in the election scandal of 2000 in order to pull a coup d'etat on our democratic system. If ever anyone deserved the label of traitors it is this cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. The GOP always uses a banal ruling to achieve another agenda
sitting on the back burner. Take it to the SCOTUS!

This appears to be a shakedown of Alaska's Marijuana Laws.
All Starr needed was the chance to get his foot in the door.

Alaskan residents are allowed to grow and have a legal amount of MJ in their possession.
Looks like, Starr is looking for language from the court to harass then prosecute local residents.

This dynamic would definitely destroy the serenity and familial culture of Alaskan residents.

God Bless Alaskans and God help you too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. The taxpayers paying for starr's next Jamaican vacation.
So the big guy can take a few big dekes from his own Bong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queenbdem87 Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. I would need a few bong hits to be fucked up enough to be a Christian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. The kid was clearly breaking school rules
If he wanted to hoist up his banner, he shouldn't have been at the school-sponsored part of the event.

I think Starr is full of it for the most part, but I don't think the school was wrong to issue consequences to this young man for his actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Gee, the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals disagrees with you.
The district already lost this case in court. Starr is attempting to get the Supreme Court to review it. I guess at least part of the Constitution is still in place even in schools. And what this is really about is thought crime. The kid has ideas the school doesn't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. As someone who was repeatedly thrown out of high school
Like 17 times my senior year, mainly for wearing anti-war tshirts and having long hair, who gives a fuck what the school rules are? If they're unconstitutional, they're unconstitutional. And depriving someone of the right to make a statement, no matter how inane, is just claptrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. AMEN!!!!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Would it have been OK to have a sign that said:
"Beers 4 Divine Pasta"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. so, in a nutshell? he's FOR the suppresion of people's free speech?
no surprise there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zreosumgame Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. Recall recently when Kenn "I Wanna be a" Starr
submitted forged documents in a criminal case? This dumb-ass needs to lose his license
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
16.  What did the doofas get caught doing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. If indeed Jesus existed, he probably used cannabis.
It's not exactly a plant known for being tough to cultivate in the Middle East.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. School's Being Anti-Jesus!
and Starr is siding with them? Wait til the rightwingers hear about this! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC