Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush warns Iran of "consequences"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 09:57 AM
Original message
Bush warns Iran of "consequences"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14888490/

Ahead of his speech to other world leaders gathered here, President Bush on Tuesday said Iran must immediately begin negotiations on its nuclear program and warned Tehran that delay would bring consequences.

Iran’s defiant pursuit of a nuclear program was at the top of the agenda when Bush met with French President Jacques Chirac on the sidelines of the three-day U.N. General Assembly meeting. The French leader is balking at the U.S. drive to sanction Iran for defying Security Council demands that it freeze uranium enrichment.

“Should they continue to stall,” Bush said of Iranian leaders, “we will then discuss the consequences of their stalling.” The president, speaking after his meeting with Chirac, said those consequences would include the possibility of sanctions.

___

Hey, the liberal light is always on at the Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy. Please stop by and say "hi!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. "...in front of the saloon at high noon!"
What a grandstanding nincompoop. Just making things worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. And I pray daily that he learns the meaning of that word
first hand, up close and personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Iran is allowed the "inalienable right" to pursue nuclear energy.
And that's a FACT.

It ain't Iran breaking laws...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nine30 Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes but..
..not nuclear weaponry under the guise of nuclear energy as is clearly their intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Wow thank God you can decipher other nations' INTENT!!!
Just like bush knew Saddam Hussein's "INTENT"!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Many folks can read palms and the stars and it sure doesn't
mean they know what they're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I do not think that developing nuclear weapons is there intent. I do think
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 10:26 AM by mom cat
however that it is hypocritical for the US to get bent out of shape about suspicions about possible intents of Iran in the distant future while continuing to support Israel who definitely has a full blown nuclear weapons program with an estimated 200 nuclear bombs aimed somewhere today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nine30 Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. The consensus seems to be..
..that there isn't enough evidence Iran wants to develop nuclear weaopns with the Uranium it is enriching. If it isn't , do we at least agree that he shouldn't be allowed to develop nuclear weapons ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. So does that make it a "thought" crime?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. the hypocrisy is unbelieveable
not to get away from the subject, the US sold arms to Pakistan who is clearly a danger to India, Pakistan is now selling arms to the Taliban in Afghanistan, and our soldiers are just sitting ducks. And we have a maniac in office telling the Iranians not to have nuclear technology, what total BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gardiner says the US is already conducting military operations in Iran:



http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/18/retired-col-sam-gardiner-says-were-in-iran-right-now/
> 18th, 2006
> Retired Col. Sam Gardiner says we’re in Iran right now
> By: John Amato @ 4:45 PM - PDT Submit or Digg this Post
>
> Col. Sam Gardiner says the US is already conducting military operations in Iran and a plan has been forwarded up to the White House. He broached this topic a few months back. (Updated with full transcript)
>
> Video-WMP Video-QT
>
> Gardiner: We’re conducting military operations inside Iran right now. The evidence is overwhelming. From both the Iranians, Americans, and from Congressional sources.
>
> Gardiner: The plan has gone to the White House. That’s not normal planning. When the plan goes to the White House, that means we’ve gone to a different state.
>
> The Agonist has more…
>
...........
> (Read the rest of this story…)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. BushCo has not had to suffer any legal consequesnece--He does not know
the meaning of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. bush is such an ass why doesn't he just talk to Ahmadinejad
wishful thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. More vagaries from Condi & the diplomacy team - consequences
and stall....stall WHAT

WHICH consequences...

more blather from the obtuse one - great opening salvo Condo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Iran has called Bushco bluff- deadline passes uneventfully
This is why oil prices are slipping. The embargo/ war premium is evaporating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Reuters: Bush accuses Iran of backing terror, nuclear arms
Bush accuses Iran of backing terror, nuclear arms
September 19, 2006

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Tuesday in a
message to the Iranian people that the government of President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad is using their resources to fund terrorists and pursue nuclear
weapons.

In his annual address to the U.N. General Assembly, Bush directed a portion
of his remarks to Iranians, saying "you deserve an opportunity to determine
your own future" and an economy that rewards their talents.

"The greatest obstacle to this future is that your rulers have chosen to deny
you liberty and to use your nation's resources to fund terrorism and fuel
extremism and pursue nuclear weapons," Bush said.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/09/19/bush_iran_president_to_face_off_at_un
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-20-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. If the potential consequences weren't so deadly
You know what I'd like to see? I'd like to see the Iranian ambassador come out and categorically deny that it is pursuing a nuc-u-lar program of any kind. The word, of course, is "nuclear" but denying the specific allegation as made by Stupidhead would fit right in with his administration's ridiculous parsing of every accusation of wrong-doing against it. "There are no plans on my desk to invade Iraq." Remember that one? It may have been technically true (the plans were in a drawer or on the credenza, but not on the desk), but there was indisputably a plan in the works to invade Iraq.

If the consequences weren't so risky for so many people all over the world, I'd love to see the Iranians issue a verbal statement that they had no nuc-u-lar program, now or ever. What could Chimpy do? Gnash his teeth? Learn how to correctly pronounce "nuclear" at last? Of course, we all know that he'd pitch a hissy fit, and a lot of people living today would soon be turned into corpses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC