Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Denver) Judge refuses to bar electronic voting machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:12 PM
Original message
(Denver) Judge refuses to bar electronic voting machines
DENVER (AP) - A judge cleared the way Friday for electronic voting machines to be used in the November election, though he chastised state officials.

Denver District Judge Lawrence Manzanares reprimanded officials for botching some of the steps that needed to be taken to make sure the devices can't be tampered with.

Manzanares said the secretary of state's office had violated state law by failing to come up with minimum security standards for the machines, many of which will be used in Colorado's most populous counties. He said the office had done an "abysmal" job in testing the machines.

However, the judge said he would not bar the use of the machines with the election just six weeks away and county clerks warning that they might not be able to print enough paper ballots in time. A lawsuit filed by a handful of voters had claimed the machines were not secure, suggesting the accuracy of election results were in jeopardy.

The Rest >> http://www.9news.com/acm_news.aspx?OSGNAME=KUSA&IKOBJECTID=d7b37ea1-0abe-421a-008f-32b931896ddd&TEMPLATEID=0c76dce6-ac1f-02d8-0047-c589c01ca7bf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's only the most important election in US history
We "might not be able to print enough paper ballots in time", so instead we'll just let the Republicans steal it with their machines once again.

Judge Manzanares should be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "might not be able to print enough paper ballots in time"
So ... no Kinkos in Colorado? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any chance of a quick appeal?
How can so many people live without consciences?

Apparently they don't imagine they will ever be held responsible for their acts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. God fucking dammit!
It's not that fucking hard to write up a ballot in Framemaker or MS Word, then have them printed in bulk. Each individual ballot could be done in a couple of hours. Assume several hundred ballot types for all the different precincts in the state, and assume that we have about a hundred people working for the state and various county clerk offices just cranking out ballots, and the job could be done in a week. Just pay a little bit of OT to ensure this doesn't interfere with regular duties. Small price to pay for election security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can't their Governor do what Md. did?
I know the legislature wasn't involved in Md, but the Gov and the Sec. of State got into an argument. The Governor won! There will be all paper ballots in Nov 2006!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. They could run parallel elections...
Also they should demand international election watchdogs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. PLEASE READ THIS RELEASE --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-22-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sort of like saying, "Yeah, the jury found him guilty of rape, but
Edited on Fri Sep-22-06 09:38 PM by Zorra
I'm going to let him go anyway. It will simply cost too much to put him in jail. So now he's free to rape again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC