Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Multipronged Tussle Over the Fate of Herds Living in an Island Park

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 02:12 AM
Original message
A Multipronged Tussle Over the Fate of Herds Living in an Island Park
There are hunters who dream about places like this.

The game — unusually large Kaibab deer, Roosevelt elk that lope like thoroughbreds along the wind-scoured ridgelines — are trophy quality. All it takes to bag one is a 30-mile trip across the Santa Barbara Channel, a rifle, good aim, a minimum fee of about $8,000 and the existing agreement by the National Park Service to close 45,000 acres of parkland to the public, August through December.

Close a public park to make way for a private hunt? That is not the Park Service’s preference. When it acquired Santa Rosa Island at the time the Channel Islands National Park was formed in 1986, it accepted a 25-year transition period during which the hunting would continue. It wants the animals off the island. The 1,150 deer and elk, park officials say, compromise the native ecosystem — by munching on seedlings of the rare island oaks, for instance.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/09/us/09hunt.html?ref=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Morning kick!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. It would help, if your link didn't require registration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's free registration
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. They need to remove non-native species
by any means necessary. Hunting would be better than just wholesale slaughter, at least they get some use of the animal.

Hunting is a very important aspect of wildlife management. Places where hunting is not allowed or is frowned upon are OVERRUN with deer that are starving, a fate worse than being hunted. All of this is the fault of humans. There are too many of us everywhere.

There is hunting in many parks. The managers use it to help manage populations, especially in the absence of natural predators. Closing them to the public when hunting is occurring is important for safety reasons. I have no problem with hunting, none whatsoever, even in a public park. I do have an issue with some hunters I have met who are jackasses, but that's another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The problem, as I've heard it, is not so much the hunting
but that hunting groups want it to be sustained. So the elk and whatnot would stay on the islands for the hunting pleasure of those with $8,000 to drop. Not the best solution. They really just need to go in and destroy all the invasive species. Hunting until they are gone, or do a total herd cull. Then maybe we can get these islands back into shape. It sounds cruel, but that's what's worked on other islands and it's what's needed here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-09-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They're currently hunting out all the pigs on the islands
And it's wholesale slaughter done by a professional outfit out of Australia.

Either it's going to be a managed recreational hunt or a slaughter, and I'm leaning towards the latter as the best option for the health of the landscape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC