Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Voting ban for felons could end with next governor (FL)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:09 PM
Original message
Voting ban for felons could end with next governor (FL)
<snip>

"Regardless of who becomes governor of Florida in three weeks, one thing now appears certain: The 136-year-old rule that keeps most felons from being able to vote after they have completed their sentences will be scrapped.

Republican Charlie Crist has switched his position and joined Democratic opponent Jim Davis in favoring restoring the civil rights of all felons automatically after they have served their time. Until recently, Crist opposed automatic restoration.

"It all comes down to one fundamental question: Do you believe that an individual has paid his debt to society?" Crist said Tuesday in an interview with The Miami Herald editorial board. "If they've really paid their debt to society, then why not restore their right to vote?"

Unlike other promises the candidates have made, undoing the 1870 rule is something a governor can do with a simple signature on an executive order, said Randall Berg, director of the Florida Justice Institute, a civil rights advocacy organization."

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/15783699.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure Crist switched
Now that most of his friends are under indictment.

Repugs are going to need all the ex-felon votes they can get.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i was just thinking the same thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. They need every vote
that they can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe it from Crist when I see it
I could see him kicking the can on it long enough so that the law change does not go into effect in time for the 2008 election.

Or I could see his Secretary of State fucking everything up and, "Oops! Were we supposed to put those ex-felons back on the voter registration rolls? Sorry about that! We'll put them back on next time. Uh, sorry. But, it's well you now, water under the bridge!"

I'll only praise Crist for this election year conversion once I see him follow through on his promise and the change to the law is actually implemented. Until then, I stand with my arms folded in skepticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is that a state law?
Im asking because I grew up in Florida and always thought it was a national thing that felons couldn't vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. State.
Racist hatred is a national thing. I understand your confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks...
color me educated... man for YEARS I thought that was country wide...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. felon disenfranchisement is mostly jim crow, barring only people in jail
on election day costs $0.00 to implement. FL spent $3 million in 2000 purging felons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. lifetime disenfranchisement for all people convicted of a felony

is law only in Florida (700,000 ex-felons), Virginia (250,000), and Kentucky (150,000+). Mississippi and Alabama disenfranchise all ex-felons convicted of violent crimes. Other states have more complicated disenfranchisement rules, or they disenfranchise probationers and give exceedingly long probations (e.g. 30 years in Georgia) tacked on to sentences proper. The full picture nationally is a grotesque mess and travesty. All these states have various legal loopholes and processes to restore rights to people that they like, of course.

There's a decent map of things at http://www.righttovote.org and a lot of paper and studies at The Sentencing Project website.

I've been interested in the whole problem since November 2000. Basically, Florida is the linchpin to the matter- other states will quickly follow suit once Florida caves. There have been a lot of lawsuits about it all over the years, with the worst sorts of jurisprudence and abuses on display by Republican-stacked federal courts. Johnson v Bush was probably the key lawsuit over the past few years; the court papers are on the Brennan Center's website.

Everything rests on the 1974 Supreme Court verdict/opinion in Richardson v Ramirez, which is the one remaining Rehnquist "accomplishment" still standing (other than re-legalization of execution i.e. "death penalty" in 1977). The RvR opinions have to be read to be believed; there are copies online.

One consequence of ex-felon disenfranchisement has been ability to manipulate voter registration and voter ID requirements in extremely abusive partisan ways. Katherine Harris did it infamously in Florida. It's a loophole through which all kinds of election abuses are perpetrated, and the abuses only end with elimination of the disenfranchisement laws altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Crist switched...
Sashayed is more like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Y'know? I don;t really mind a felon ban on voting, BUT
when they have paid their debt to society, voter re-registration should be a part of the release paperwork..

My guess is that most felons probably don't give a crap about votiing, but they should not be prevented, if they want to.

The exception?

If the conviction is for election fraud, they lose the right permanently :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC