Bush: U.S. will stop N. Korea nuke moves

[ECH1969]

In light of North Korea‘s Oct. 9 test detonation of a nuclear bomb, Bush warned that any transfer of nuclear material elsewhere in the world by the North would be considered a grave threat to the security of the United States.

He previously used "grave threat" in relation to Iraq ‘s Saddam Hussein, whose government was toppled in the U.S.-led war in 2003.

Asked how he would retaliate, Bush would not be specific, "You know, I‘d just say it‘s a grave consequence."

http://www.localnewswatch.com/benton/stories/index.php?action=fullnews&id=17038

[truthisfreedom]

1. o-o-o-o-o-o-o-oooooooooh! with halloween coming up, "grave" seems so

much more scaaaaaaaarrrry!

[peace13]

2. And with who or what will we retaliate.

He should bring the troops home before he goes sniffing under any more rocks. God save us, Kim

[anotherdrew]

3. is it time to start evacuating Seoul? n/t

why not start now?

[sinkingfeeling]

4. Like the 'grave consequences' we had for Pakistan giving away nuke

technology?

[BushOut06]

5. Bingo, we have a winner!

Pakistan placed A.Q.Khan, the scientist responsible for passing nuke secrets throughout the Islamic world - and North Korea, on friggin house arrest! Furthermore, they wouldn't let American intelligence anywhere near him to find out who he gave secrets to.

Bush called this 'good cooperation' by Pakistan.

Bush seems to have a skewed sense of what is a good job. He tells Brownie he did a "heckuva job." He tells Iraq's prime minister that he's doing a swell job. What would Bush consider a bad job?

[bamacrat]

6. Is this his way of saying we are about to bomb?