Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

6.5 earthquake near peru

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:10 AM
Original message
6.5 earthquake near peru
Edited on Fri Oct-20-06 10:11 AM by bananas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RexDart Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. No west coast tsunami threat.
This was in my inbox this morning...

FROM - WEST COAST AND ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
SUBJECT - TSUNAMI INFORMATION
BULLETIN NUMBER 1
ISSUED 10/20/2006 AT 1106 UTC

...THIS TSUNAMI INFORMATION STATEMENT IS FOR ALASKA/ BRITISH
COLUMBIA/ WASHINGTON/ OREGON AND CALIFORNIA ONLY...

NO - REPEAT NO - WATCH OR WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR THE STATES AND PROVINCES LISTED ABOVE.

EVALUATION
BASED ON MAGNITUDE AND HISTORIC TSUNAMI INFORMATION THE EARTHQUAKE WAS NOT SUFFICIENT TO GENERATE A TSUNAMI DAMAGING TO CALIFORNIA/ OREGON/ WASHINGTON/ BRITISH COLUMBIA OR ALASKA. IN COASTAL AREAS OF INTENSE SHAKING LOCALLY GENERATED TSUNAMIS CAN BE TRIGGERED BY UNDERWATER LANDSLIDES.

PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
MAGNITUDE - 6.6
TIME - 0249 ADT OCT 20 2006
0349 PDT OCT 20 2006
1049 UTC OCT 20 2006
LOCATION - 13.3 SOUTH 76.5 WEST
- NEAR COAST OF PERU
DEPTH - 31 MILES

THE PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER WILL ISSUE MESSAGES
FOR HAWAII AND OTHER AREAS OF THE PACIFIC.

THIS WILL BE THE ONLY STATEMENT ISSUED FOR THIS EVENT BY THE WEST COAST AND ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER UNLESS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE. REFER TO THE INTERNET SITE
WCATWC.ARH.NOAA.GOV FOR MORE INFORMATION.


For people in California, there's a web site www.incident.com that allows you to sign up for email alerts. Mine is set for quake, weather, and amber alerts. Worth a check out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The amber alerts are overwhelming
I unsubscribed because it mostly amber alerts,
and there was no way to turn them off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's all Clinton's fault for appeasing the tectonic plates for 8 years.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I Was Hoping That Paraguay, the Bush Bolthole, Would Be Hit
sort of the Wrath of God scenario...with the proviso that no authentic Paraguayans incur any losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Paraguay is an inland country
Them Bushies ain't no dummies :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not good
but the main reason I am posting is to say that you are absolutely right about Lieberman losing the election for Gore. Sorry for going off topic. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks!
Glad to know someone's reading my sig line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Northern CA quake just reported on msnbc n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Peru quake might have triggered it
Unlike Kim Jong the Second's little 4.2 firecracker in a coal mine, a 6.5 actually has some oomph to it.

What really worries me is the fault line in Missouri going off. It had three(!!!) 8.0 earthquakes in a three-month period about two hundred years ago and has been quiet ever since.

<snip>

While all eyes are fixed on California as the site of the next “Big One,” damage from a quake along the New Madrid Fault--which runs for 150 miles between Marked Tree, Ark., and Cairo, Ill.--may be greater. The hot, shattered crust beneath California absorbs seismic energy quickly and focuses it at an epicenter, says Gary Patterson, a geologist at the University of Memphis. But, he says, “the relatively hard, cold slab of rock beneath the central U.S. allows that energy to travel great distances.” A quake's impact zone is at least 10 times larger on the New Madrid Fault than on the San Andreas, and its shock waves reverberate longer.

The New Madrid Fault has produced the strongest earthquakes in the contiguous states: three tremors near magnitude 8.0 that struck from December 1811 to February 1812. Odds of a quake of that scale are small: 7 to 10 percent in the next 50 years. But factor in unprepared citizens and infrastructure and even a 6.0 earthquake, which has a 25 to 40 percent chance of occurring, would be a disaster.


<end snip>

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/3852052.html?page=3

And I don't live too far from the Mississippi, less than ten miles. Last thing I want is some upheavel reversing the flow of the Mississippi and turning the Metro area into a the 10,001st Lake!

Then I'd have to move back to Connecticut and have Joe for my senator. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. The World is Crumbling With Quakes....data...
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsus/
This is a map of U.S. activity in the last 7 days.

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/recenteqsww/
This is a map of World activity in the last 7 days.

We've heard a lot lately about earthquakes including near Korea/Japan, North Carolina/Missouri, Peru, and the list goes on. It seems like every day there's another 1-2 earthquakes mentioned in the media. I think another week of this and I'll be a bit freaked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Do we usually have so many earthquakes?
Or is something else going on this year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
transeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yes
The only things that have changed are increased monitoring and reporting, and more human population and thus more people affected. The frequency of earthquakes has not increased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC