Unlike Kim Jong the Second's little 4.2 firecracker in a coal mine, a 6.5 actually has some oomph to it.
What really worries me is the fault line in Missouri going off. It had three(!!!) 8.0 earthquakes in a three-month period about two hundred years ago and has been quiet ever since.
<snip>
While all eyes are fixed on California as the site of the next “Big One,” damage from a quake along the New Madrid Fault--which runs for 150 miles between Marked Tree, Ark., and Cairo, Ill.--may be greater. The hot, shattered crust beneath California absorbs seismic energy quickly and focuses it at an epicenter, says Gary Patterson, a geologist at the University of Memphis. But, he says, “the relatively hard, cold slab of rock beneath the central U.S. allows that energy to travel great distances.” A quake's impact zone is at least 10 times larger on the New Madrid Fault than on the San Andreas, and its shock waves reverberate longer.
The New Madrid Fault has produced the strongest earthquakes in the contiguous states: three tremors near magnitude 8.0 that struck from December 1811 to February 1812. Odds of a quake of that scale are small: 7 to 10 percent in the next 50 years. But factor in unprepared citizens and infrastructure and even a 6.0 earthquake, which has a 25 to 40 percent chance of occurring, would be a disaster.<end snip>
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/3852052.html?page=3And I don't live too far from the Mississippi, less than ten miles. Last thing I want is some upheavel reversing the flow of the Mississippi and turning the Metro area into a the 10,001st Lake!
Then I'd have to move back to Connecticut and have Joe for my senator. Again.