Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP Rumsfeld: Iraq must take over security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:10 PM
Original message
AP Rumsfeld: Iraq must take over security

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061020/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/rumsfeld_1;_ylt=AsmyM5wEtJkrxZjzk2_pFGQGw_IE


Rumsfeld: Iraq must take over security

By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer 10 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Iraqi government is going to have to take over its country's security "sooner rather than later," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Friday, as the violence there continued to escalate.

Rumsfeld said U.S. officials, including Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, are working with the Iraqi government to develop projections as to when they think they can pass off various pieces of responsibility. He provided no detail.

"The biggest mistake would be to not pass things over to the Iraqis, create a dependency on their part, instead of developing strength and capacity and competence," said Rumsfeld. "It's their country, they're going to have to govern it, they're going to have to provide security for it, and they're going to have to do it sooner rather than later. And that means they've got to take pieces of it as we go along."
.......

But Friday's remarks came less than three weeks before elections in which Democrats are threatening to recapture control of Congress. A leading issue in the campaign is the war, which is widely unpopular with voters. U.S. deaths have surpassed 2,780, and
President Bush is under growing pressure from lawmakers of both parties to alter his policies.
........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. and: Bush: US troops to remain in Iraq until 'terrorists' defeated


Fri Oct-20-06 08:10 AM
Original message
AFP: Bush: US troops to remain in Iraq until 'terrorists' defeated

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061020/pl_afp/usiraqunres... ;_ylt=Ah4FPXZ4kwbo2LGuX1PRFUzMWM0F;_ylu=X3oDMTA3b2NibDltBHNlYwM3MTY-

Bush: US troops to remain in Iraq until 'terrorists' defeated

by Laurent Lozano Fri Oct 20, 3:38 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) -President George W. Bush insisted that US troops would not pull out of Iraq before "the terrorists are defeated," a day after acknowledging a possible parallel between violence there and the Tet Offensive during the US war in Vietnam.

The comments, coming less than three weeks before crucial elections, follow his acknowledgement on Wednesday that the current steep spike in violence in Iraq "could be" compared to the Tet Offensive, widely considered to be key to souring US public opinion on the Vietnam War.

"Our goal in Iraq is clear and unchanging. Our goal is victory," said Bush, speaking at a rally Thursday for embattled Republican congressman Don Sherwood in the town of La Plume, Pennsylvania.

"We are a nation at war, and we must do everything in our power to win that war," he said.

"We will not pull out our troops from Iraq before the terrorists are defeated. We will not pull out before Iraq can govern itself, sustain itself, and defend itself," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Rummy
You friggin Jack Ass, how can they if they don't have a functioning government?

Bu$hco - First in failures corporate, diplomatic, and governmental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. seems that the WH is flying by the seats of their pants at the moment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. What happened to "we'll stand down as they stand up" ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. First Tet, now Iraqization
The comparisons just keep on coming.

And this is by Rumsfeld himself, geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...but...but...isn't that cutting and running?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. My immediate response: what Iraq? There is no Iraq. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. In a way, they are
Al Sadr's militia took over a town and by accounts things are more peaceful there now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Right. We should start just giving cities to Sadr and as he brings
peace, we can move out. US out of Iraq, NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is very similar to what they did in '04
Started blaming it on the Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. Iraq was 100% secure under Saddam
It is now 100% insecure under Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where's the shock and awe, chump?
Time for the shuck and jive?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. With what, Donny?
Poorly equipped, untrained, militia-riddled, no-morale dupes making $20 a month?

Get the money back from Halliburton that you and Cheney let them steal, then maybe in a couple of years you MIGHT have a small combat force. Until then, you have the unemployed pretending to train so they can get a paycheck. Except, of course, for the infiltrators from the insurgency. Who probably make up about 20 percent of the force.

Get outta here, you nut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. .....cuz we done fucked it alllllll up and cain't fix it
Did we lie to invade? Sure.

Are we war criminals? Possibly.

Should I be hung? Of course.

Do I avoid questions by posing my own? Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Freedom's "messy", SecDef
It's almost like you shouldn't have disbanded ALL of their social structures in the FIRST place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC