Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY: TV stations reject sex hotline ad in congressional campaign (w/ video)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:13 PM
Original message
NY: TV stations reject sex hotline ad in congressional campaign (w/ video)
http://www.uticaod.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061020/NEWS/61020019

Three Central New York television stations have chosen not to run an advertisement from the National Republican Congressional Committee that alleges Michael Arcuri made calls to a sex hotline while at a conference in New York City.

... Documents provided by both the NRCC and the Arcuri campaign show a call lasting less than a minute to an 800 number that is now a sex line.

Arcuri said that number was dialed by accident by Sean Byrne, the executive director of the New York Prosecutor Training Institute, who was meeting with him and others in the hotel room. Byrne also said that was the case, and records show immediately following the call to the sex line, he called the same seven digits, but with a 518 area code, not an 800 prefix.

... To view the ad, go to http://web1.nrcc.org/multimedia/communications/NY-24NRCC7ForwardCalling.mov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Smooches to NY, Dems, and the truth! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. they're stooping this low
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. These pukes are all goin down scratchin and clawin
its a joy to observe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hpot Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Republicans have repressed sexual desires
Edited on Fri Oct-20-06 11:26 PM by hpot
Their obsession with little kids, reproduction, and all things sex related should not be surprising.

GOP: Grand Old Perverts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redphish Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. What do you expect?
They treat human sexuality as if it was something evil and organized slaughter (for their goals) as something noble. Good is evil, evil is good. Shades of Orwell me thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why am I thinking that Bushco is monitoring Dem phones?
Actually, my tinfoil hat it so damned tight that I believe it's been going on since W took office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's a lie
They know what happened, but they deliberately want to misled people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrick t. cakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. it would almost be funny
if it wasnt so sick, and sad.

whats happening to our country?

(glad my tv is dvd compatable only, these adds get so tiresome)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. I want to know
how they got the phone records in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That should trigger an investigation by a reporter.
How did the Republican Party get access to hotel phone records. It needs to be explained. It's underhanded, and, you'd think, illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. Absolutely right
The fact that the RNC knew this information raises a lot more questions than someone's call to a sex line.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. lord, that is sooooo LOW
and really desperate too. 'LOOK, a democrat dialed a WRONG NUMBER!!!!'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. The add is hysterical
Even the Daily Show can't make shit like this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. So, clear proof of whose phones the Repubs are tapping. DEMOCRATS.
How else do they have such detailed info on a wrong-number call
that lasted less than a minute?

What other POSSIBLE explanation is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Republican hotel employee maybe?
Not everything is a conspiracy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonescrat Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. That in itself would be a conspiracy... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Or it was a rabid neocon eager to prove himself.
Conspiracy implies multiple people were involved in the planning and execution. there's no proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Actually, it turns out a legal FOIA request would be sufficient.
As he was there on Official Business, the phone logs
would be considered a public record.

I got excited about NOTHING, as it turns out.

Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zreosumgame Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. only takes two to conspire
actually you alone can conspire to comit an act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. From the ad, the hotel room was used for official business
and the bill, which included the phone charges, was paid by the county. Therefore it would be public record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Yes, that does seem to be the case. No "tapping" needed. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. This has huge implications
I'm not personally concerned about the particulars of this case, but it makes an important point with broad applications:

Under certain circumstances, TV stations *will* reject campaign ads. They're admitting that they don't have to blindly accept whatever lies and distortions the campaigns feed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. good for the stations. It gives me hope that their is SOME integrity
left in this the good us of a.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
20. To add a little more to the story
My local news covered this story and said that this happened 5 years ago. The 800 number was changed to the sex line 2 years ago, and that they have no idea who had the number when the incident happened.

The repubs are really reaching here, AND not telling you that they are repubs in their ads. To be fair this ad was put out by the repub party and not the candidate.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. The candidate even tried to get the NRCC to pull it.
From the OP

A Meier spokeswoman said Meier had called the NRCC and demanded that they not run the ad. NRCC spokesman Ed Patru said his organization is not allowed to coordinate with candidates.

IMO, that just screams out the need for campaign reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:07 AM
Original message
thank goodness you have real journalists on your local news
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 10:08 AM by spooky3
They seem to be in short supply.

www.mediamatters.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. The "morals" party
I guess knowingly lying in order to harm someone doesn't violate Republicans' standards of "morality."

Any idiot would know that if he were really calling a sex line, that call would have lasted longer than a minute! Oh wait, we are dealing with Republicans here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Just a quickie - "Quick like a bunny" as they say 'round these parts. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. At least those NSA wiretaps are proving useful to someone n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
25. What kind of people are they? and what kind of money is behind them?
When someone is going through a five year old phone bill to dig up dirt, that smacks both of desperation and an organization that borders on criminal.

The ad does lie, by the way. How could the Oneida County tax payers been charged for a call to an 800 number?

Here's the real question: how did they recognize the number as belonging to a sex hot line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. It occurred to me when I was telling someone about this,
Mike Acuri has got to be the cleanest politician in the entire country. Think about it. The Rethugs spent enough money investigating him to track down an 800 number called from his hotel suite 5 years ago, yet they found nothing worthwhile to tar him with!


Also, how did the Rethugs know the 800 number was to a sex line? Is it one they use frequently themselves, perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Jeez, you're right. He's gotta be practically a saint (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. "National Republican Congressional Committee" ? Who else do they fund?
The ONE-MINUTE phone call makes a good story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Our favorite congressman, Reynolds, was running that committee
when he wasn't busy collecting money from Foley!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
33. Brazilions of dollars and much effort spent on trying to dig up dirt
on the Democrats and this is the best they can do? A mis-dailed phone number?

Either the dems are actually saints or their intellegence gathering capabilities are truly awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. Question: How did Repukes get phone records without a warrant?
It's a bogus charge, but now I want to know how the NRCC was able to obtain call records for a US citizen without a warrant.

Could this be prima facie evidence of the NSA domestic Eschelon program used for political purposes?

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC