Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Absentee votes may delay results (OH)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 08:02 AM
Original message
Absentee votes may delay results (OH)
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
Joan Mazzolini
Plain Dealer Reporter

Elections officials in large and small Ohio counties say they can't count all their absentee ballots in time to provide results on Election Day, unless they can start scanning them days earlier.

But the secretary of state's office has told Cuyahoga and Lucas counties, which asked for advice, that state law does not allow counting absentee ballots before 12:01 a.m. Election Day.

If the counties cannot begin early, Ohioans could go to bed without knowing the results of close and, even, not-so-close races.

Elections officials in Cuyahoga County and others contend that scanning ballots is not the same as counting votes. They say they want to scan the ballots in the days before Election Day and store the information. Then, they would hit a tabulation button at 7:30 p.m. on Election Day to do the counts.

http://www.cleveland.com/election/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1161765666260920.xml&coll=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course not...
They need more time to tamper with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Blackwell knows he can okay the scanning of the ballots early.
He just doesn't want to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. "storing information"
Edited on Wed Oct-25-06 08:12 AM by liam_laddie
I'd bet my last Euro that there are programmer(s) within the system vendors burning midnight oil
to write software which can omit votes, mainly D of course, as desired by the SOS or any other R's
really in charge, including operatives in DC. Other-the-top cynicism? Fuckin'A RIGHT!
FWIW, I'm in Cincinnati, which votes D, but in the middle of a cesspool of corrupt R counties.
Let's watch for excessive humidity in Clermont county, shall we? And terra threats in Warren?
And mere incompetence in Butler, okay? Jaysus, save us from these goddam devils!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hello, fellow Cincinnatian!!
Evil rides into town today. Cheney will be at the Phoenix at noon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep Autorank/TIA has OH-02 (Mean Jean's high humidity district) as a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. They can't scan them at the polls when there are breaks?
Shouldn't the absentee ballots be scanned in the precincts/wards they belong?

Do they need to be known as an absentee when the votes are tallied? If so, didn't they include that in the software capability? Shouldn't be that difficult to id the ballot as absentee or regular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Groan
And look what's buried in the article:

"Completing the scans by 8 p.m. is critical. A Diebold Election Systems computer server that Cuyahoga bought can't download absentee ballot information at the same time it downloads votes from the touch-screen machines used in polling places."

"Lucas County election officials have yet to decide how they will count their absentee ballots rapidly.

"We'll be talking to our board and our prosecutor about how to proceed," said Jill Kelly, director of the county elections board. Kelly does not know whether the board's Diebold equipment is capable of scanning 20,000 absentee ballots in one day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CabalPowered Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-25-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cuyahoga
Just the mention of that county makes me twinge in pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC