WP: Cancer Study Finds Promise in CAT Scans for Smokers

[DeepModem Mom]

Cancer Study Finds Promise in CAT Scans for Smokers
By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 26, 2006; Page A10

A new study has found that it is possible to find a large number of "silent" cancers in the lungs of heavy smokers by periodically screening them with CAT scans. When the tumors are then surgically removed, most people live five years or more, in striking contrast to patients whose cancers are found only after they experience symptoms.

The study of nearly 32,000 people in eight countries boosts hope that early detection by CAT scans may reduce the death toll of lung cancer, much as mammography has done for breast cancer. But while the research clearly shows that the interval between diagnosis and death was longer in screened patients, it does not definitively show they lived longer -- a subtle difference with significant public health consequences.

Lung cancer kills about 162,000 Americans a year and is the leading cause of cancer death in men and women. Only 15 percent of people with the disease survive five years from the time it is diagnosed....

Some people, including many treatment advocates, think there is enough evidence to urge all heavy smokers to have routine CAT scans. Others, including researchers and policymakers in the government, say it is a question that will not be settled for five or six years, when other studies are complete.

The new research, which appears in today's issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, seems destined to heat up that argument....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/25/AR2006102501397.html

[onehandle]

1. So, smoke 'em if you got 'em.

Science (and our insurance premiums) will keep you alive forever.

[warrens]

2. So eat em if you got em

Science and our insurance premiums will also keep the obese alive for years.

[onehandle]

3. That too.

Of course high fat foods don't float across the room and give me cancer.

Eat up, gluttons. Just don't smoke anywhere near me in public spaces.

[TahitiNut]

5. Are you under the impression that non-smokers' insurance pays for smokers'

... health care? Are you aware of the fact that health insurance and life insurance premiums for smokers are higher than for non-smokers?

The meme of "they cost us" is a perpetuation of a falsehood. Numerous studies show conclusively that smokers don't cost the "rest of us" anything. They more than pay their way.

[Divernan]

4. I'm wondering if these heavy smokers were able to quit smoking

after they had the tumors removed. Most of us know someone who is a heavy smoker and would like to quit, but just can't manage to do so. I'll be forwarding this article to a few of them.

More from the article:

In 1994, the study, called the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program, began screening smokers and former smokers, as well as a few nonsmokers exposed to radon, beryllium and other cancer-causing substances.

In all, 31,567 people were screened. In the ensuing years, about 27,000 more scans were done, with some people having them annually. All were "spiral" or "helical" CAT scans in which the machine films the entire chest in the time that a person can hold a single breath.

About 13 percent of the baseline scans and 5 percent of the later ones found abnormalities. Many of these lump-shaped masses were watched with further scans to see whether they grew; others were examined with other imaging devices. Ultimately, 535 were biopsied to see if they were lung cancer -- and 484 were.

Of that group, 85 percent had small tumors that had not spread. Such early lung cancers can usually be cured; the problem is that they are usually found at that "asymptomatic stage" only by chance when someone has a CAT scan or chest X-ray for an unrelated reason.