Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Activists want mercenaries regulated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:31 PM
Original message
Activists want mercenaries regulated
LONDON - A humanitarian group called Monday for government regulation of private security companies in combat zones, saying "mercenaries" often operate with impunity in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The London-based War on Want delivered a list of recommended regulations for the private security industry to Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett, calling for increased scrutiny of allegations of human rights abuses by private security staff.

The demand comes as a conference of British defense firms working in Iraq and Afghanistan was set to open Monday in London.

Both the British government and private security companies agree that regulation is needed. But the companies say an independent ombudsman — rather than government regulation — would be more effective.

Yahoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not an international BAN on mercenary groups?
Seriously, how did it ever come to this? This sounds like stuff you would read in some RW war-fantasy novel, not what you would expect to see in the real world. Kill-for-profit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. There has been one in the works, since 1989
Edited on Sun Oct-29-06 09:13 PM by htuttle
The International Convention against the Recruitment, Use, Financing and Training of Mercenaries.
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/FULL/530?OpenDocument

But there hasn't been much headway getting it signed and ratified among UN member states.
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/27a/062.html

Only 16 nations have signed and ratified it (Azerbaijan, Barbados, Belarus, Cameroon, Cyprus, Georgia, Italy, Maldives, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, Suriname, Togo, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan) and 10 more states have signed it, but not ratified it yet (Angola, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Germany, Morocco, Nigeria, Poland, Romania, Uruguay and Yugoslavia). Note the complete absence of all of the permanent members of the Security Council.

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebSign?ReadForm&id=530&ps=P
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebSign?ReadForm&id=530&ps=S
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Too true, but we're living in Bush & Cheney's fantasy world.
Impeachment & punishment of the criminals is about the only way back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Seriously?
I think mercenaries are as old as war.

"Kill-for-profit?"

Is that a real question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. True, but still...
I know there have been mercenary groups for quite some time. But corporate mercenary groups?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. If corporations had been around longer
they would have been doing it the whole time. A King rounds up a few guys to do some killing, a CEO establishes a company that provides guys to do some killing. The only difference today is that it's under the umbrella of capitalism. Just providing a service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-29-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Iraq had a functioning government, mercenaries would be regulated
It doesn't, so they aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why not both gov't regulations with independent followup?
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. These Thugs and Hoodlums are approved at the highest levels
Including a corrupt military who lets these monsters operate with

"THE GLOVES OFF"





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. they were sent into NOLA after Katrina
...who knows how many U.S. citizens were killed by mercenaries then? The press was not allowed in, if you will recall, but witnesses said they saw men with black ski masks and all kinds of weapons. BushCo used NOLA as a practice exercise for their fantasy of eliminating us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Seriously? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-30-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Security firms 'abusing Iraqis' (UK)
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 07:37 AM by magellan
Private security firms operating in Iraq are committing human rights abuses, a charity has claimed.

A report by War on Want says no prosecutions have been brought despite hundreds of complaints of abuse.

snip...

Lt Col Tim Spicer, whose Aegis security firm operates in Iraq, said they worked under "very strict rules" and could be prosecuted if they did anything wrong.

'Huge profits'

War on Want claims UK ministers are increasingly using private security firms with a total of 48,000 employees in Iraq - six to every British soldier.

John Hilary, the group's campaigns and policy director, said the Iraq war "has allowed British mercenaries to reap huge profits".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6097372.stm

on edit: subject line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC