Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters: Cluster bomb victims overwhelmingly civilian: report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:57 AM
Original message
Reuters: Cluster bomb victims overwhelmingly civilian: report
Cluster bomb victims overwhelmingly civilian: report

Reuters
Thursday, November 2, 2006; 4:44 AM

GENEVA (Reuters) - Civilians, a quarter of them children, make up almost all the
victims of cluster bombs over the last three decades, a humanitarian agency said
on Thursday.

In a study of 24 countries and regions, Handicap International said the controversial
weapons, which scatter munitions over a wide area, had killed, wounded or maimed
11,044 people of whom 98 percent were civilians.

-snip-

Some 27 percent of the victims were children, mainly boys, who were working or
playing in areas where munitions were lying around after failing to explode on impact.

"For 30 years governments have failed to address the disproportionate, long-term
harm these weapons cause to civilian populations," Angelo Simonazzi, the agency's
director general, said in a statement.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/02/AR2006110200240.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just plain awful.
In the study mentioned 98 percent of the casualties were civilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nolo_Contendre Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. That way they won't grow up to be terrorists
repugnican logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. .
Oh I'm sure the right will question the numbers again...as they are so unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do Not Taunt Happy Fun Ball
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 07:08 AM by IanDB1


If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.

Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types of skin.

When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be returned to its special container and kept under refrigeration...

Failure to do so relieves the makers of Happy Fun Ball, Wacky Products Incorporated, and its parent company Global Chemical Unlimited, of any and all liability.

Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an unknown glowing substance which fell to Earth, presumably from outer space.

Happy Fun Ball has been shipped to our troops in Saudi Arabia and is also being dropped by our warplanes on Iraq.

Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

Happy Fun Ball comes with a lifetime guarantee.

Happy Fun Ball

ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!

http://www.happyfunball.com/hfb.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sugapablo Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well no shit...
In modern day warfare, we have wars where armies (such as the US and Israel) are forced to fight civilian "combatants", not national armies. So every death inflicted by the only standing army in the fight is really a "civilian casualty".

I mean hell, in Iraq, we defeated Saddam's army in days, and since then, every "combatant" we kill is really a civilian. Not to mention that these "civilian combatants" attack from, organize and hide within, civilian areas. It is impossible to weed them out without hitting innocents.

Sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. We were not "forced to fight" in Iraq. Weapons can be banned,
The language of your post accepts that warring against whole populations is a legitimate policy and that the way it is is the way it has to be. Perhaps you ought to examine your assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sugapablo Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh hush...
Nowhere in my post did I imply we were "forced to fight" in Iraq.

The only people "forced to fight" in Iraq were the soldiers who were shipped out when * made the biggest blunder in US Foreign Policy history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC