Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times: Perle says he should not have backed Iraq war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:05 PM
Original message
LA Times: Perle says he should not have backed Iraq war
By Peter Spiegel, Times Staff Writer
November 4, 2006

WASHINGTON — Richard N. Perle, the former Pentagon advisor regarded as the intellectual godfather of the Iraq war, now believes he should not have backed the U.S.-led invasion, and he holds President Bush responsible for failing to make timely decisions to stem the rising violence, according to excerpts from a magazine interview.

Perle — a leading neoconservative who chaired the Pentagon's defense advisory board for the first three years of the Bush administration — is quoted in January's Vanity Fair as saying the U.S. might have been able to strip Saddam Hussein of his ability to build unconventional weapons "by means other than a direct military intervention."

"I think if I had been Delphic, and had seen where we are today, and people had said 'Should we go into Iraq?' I think now I probably would have said, 'No, let's consider other strategies for dealing with the thing that concerns us most, which is Saddam supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorists,' " Perle said, according to interview excerpts released Friday by the magazine.

Perle's about-face is the latest in a series of war recriminations by neoconservatives, many of whom blame Iraq's spiraling violence on the administration's management of the postwar stabilization effort.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-neocons4nov04,1,3462318.story?coll=la-news-a_section

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rats... Ships... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Jump .... drown
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Forget it Richard. There is still a docket page at the Hague
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 12:08 PM by acmavm
with your name on it. Along with the rest of the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
64. "Dammit! We should've invaded IRAN first, and Iraq second!"
That's probably the only misgiving this neocon murderer ever had!

So, hey, Rich, hindsight is 20/20. So, like, YOU had a better strategy for "securing the Realm" (and I DON'T mean the U.S. "realm")? Yeah, right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. he still seems unwilling to admit the most fundamental truth of all....
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 12:08 PM by mike_c
Saddam Hussein did not have any weapons of mass destruction to give anyone. There was no "problem" to solve in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. No, the fundamental truth was that we invaded a sovereign nation
Which had NOT attacked us.

He is still okay with that. He thinks the execution was wrong but the idea was just dandy.

He will never understand that there WAS NO OTHER POSSIBLE OUTCOME. If we had built a million nifty schools, they would have blown up a million nifty schools. He doesn't understand why people don't like foreign invaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
65. Also, PERLE himself INSTIGATED this war!!!
Perle was, since the 1997 PNAC declaration, one of the initial architects and instigators of this war. This is HIS war. This is part of his own doing.

Now that the shot hit the fan in a disastrous way, Perle is trying to abandon ship and salvage some of what's left of his reputation. DON'T LET HIM! People should ALWAYS remind this bastard that this is HIS war. This is the war HE and his PNAC cabal architected. This is his doing.

He's trying to sneak out of this mess. Too fucking late!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh please, spare me the crocodile tears
What manner of bullshit do we have here? "If I had been Delphic, and had seen where we are today." You fucking bloodthirsty, greedy asshole! You had millions of people telling you exactly where the road you were on was headed. And your response was an indulgent chuckle, and a dismissive, airy wave of your grasping little hand.

The problem wasn't the management of your lunatic policy; it was the policy itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. That's exactly it.
The problem wasn't the management of the lunatic policy, it was the Policy itself.

THAT's the Problem. They still don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
42. precisely!
as always, grats.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AliceWonderland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
50. Good point - Perle speaks as if no one foresaw these events
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 09:45 PM by AliceWonderland
Plenty did, and said that a violent spiral of factional conflict would occur if Iraq were invaded and its leader deposed by force. Plenty said that if one's goals are social justice and human rights, war, invasion and increased instability were not the way to achieve them.

Spare me the "delphic" crap, which implies that this situation was unthinkable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Eat shit, Perle
You helped make this horror happen. You cannot disassociate yourself from it now or ever.

Do the frog march, Perle. I hope your day in court comes soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Master of the Obvious
The neocons and the beltway whores have blood on their hands. He can say he is sorry and he wouldn't do it again, but that won't bring back one dead soldier or one dead Iraqi. Fuck him and the horse he rode in on. The son of a bitch ought to have to spend the rest of his life as a servant for a gold star mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Guess it didn't work out the way Israel wanted it - Perle reportedly
had ties to the Israel Lobby as did a number of NeoCons, both Goyim and Jewish

Come to think of it, neither did the hizbollah thing work out well for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Yep, it's criminal how this Admin has directed the US military to serve as proxy for Israel
Under Bush, US foreign policy has become more fucked-up than ever... it will probably take decades to restore a modicum of credibility again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Delphic?" DELPHIC??????
It did not take powers of prophesy to know how Iraq was going to turn out. I knew and I am not Delphic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. I guess that makes us - DELPHIC UNDERGROUND, huh?
Because we all knew their Iraq Adventure was FUBAR'd from the first glint in their beady little eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. ATTENTION ALL NEOCONS ...
... YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE.

The last lifeboat has already been launched. It is too late to distance yourselves from the iceberg you yourselves created.

Would anyone like to join in a rousing rendition of "Nearer My God to Thee" before the waters overtake you?

Class? Anyone?

Perle?

Frum?

Adelman?

Bueller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. LOL!
The mental picture your post evokes...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. "say it isn't so Ms. Greggs"
"Please tell me there is still time to redeem my wretched soul?"



:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Of all of the PNAC boys ...
... HE'S the one who gives me the booboo-geebees most of all. There isn't an ounce of that man that doesn't excude back-stabbing sliminess - but I guess that's what his buddy George is just finding out for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. Saint Peter isn't even going to wait for the elevator doors to open
when Perle appears before the Pearly Gates. Saint Peter will PRE-EMPTIVELY press the "DOWN" button. ;) Pearle is too evil for even an Angel of God to cast his eyes upon.

IMO, perle's pure evil. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestHoustonDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Too little too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. 650,000 Iraqis raise their dead middle fingers at Perle.
Too late for that Dicky. You fucked up big time and you have blood all over your hands and no amount of mea culpa scrubbing is going to get them clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. A new Pearl Harbor will convince them it's the right thing to do...isn't that
how it went, Mr Perle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. I find some small measure of relief...
...in the thought that when that little Simon Bar Sinister is out in public he sees all those eyes of his accusers staring at him relentlessly.

No amount of second guessing or apologizing will save you, you soft-spoken merchant of death.

A sentence of twenty to life at the Hague would be a good start though.

I must admit to a bit of schadenfreude in watching the political life of George Bush being thrown under a bus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Isn't there a fundamental difference between 'backing' the war, vs. fronting it?
"intellectual godfather of the Iraq war" doesn't sound like just another 'yes' vote in the oval office..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fuck you, Perle...you are a war criminal just like the rest of them.
See you at the Hague...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. So just about all of here at DU were/are "Delphic".
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 01:16 PM by UTUSN
And we are Delphic withOUT any special intel resources. PERLE and the whole Shrub crew need a Nuremberg trial----ALL of 'em, with full consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. "I'm getting damn tired of being described as an architect of the war"
"I'm getting damn tired of being described as an architect of the war. I was in favor of bringing down Saddam. Nobody said, 'Go design the campaign to do that.' I had no responsibility for that."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Vanity Fair Exclusive: Now They Tell Us
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2006/12/neocons200612?currentPage=2

Vanity Fair Exclusive: Now They Tell Us

Kenneth Adelman, a lifelong neocon activist and Pentagon insider who served on the Defense Policy Board until 2005, wrote a famous op-ed article in The Washington Post in February 2002, arguing: "I believe demolishing Hussein's military power and liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk." Now he says, "I just presumed that what I considered to be the most competent national-security team since Truman was indeed going to be competent. They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the post-war era. Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional."

...

I spend the better part of two weeks in conversations with some of the most respected voices among the neoconservative elite. What I discover is that none of them is optimistic. All of them have regrets, not only about what has happened but also, in many cases, about the roles they played. Their dismay extends beyond the tactical issues of whether America did right or wrong, to the underlying question of whether exporting democracy is something America knows how to do.

I will present my findings in full in the January issue of Vanity Fair, which will reach newsstands in New York and L.A. on December 6 and nationally by December 12. In the meantime, here is a brief survey of some of what I heard from the war's remorseful proponents.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. They're passing the buck quicker than Wm Bennett at a blackjack table! -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. love that phrase: "exporting democracy"
None of the war criminals were in it for whatever the hell that is supposed to mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyBob Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. "exporting democracy"
When I first skimmed the article, I thought it said "exploiting democracy". That's the one thing Bushco. Inc. has done very well, exploiting OUR democracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
52. Sounds like the strong possibility of the Dems getting subpoena
power has got them covering their rears and scampering for cover. Hee hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CentralEuropeanDude Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. War of Aggression. Supreme Crime. The Hague. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Prince of Darkness Explains Iraq (Corn 2002)
... Forget the 250,000 figure, Perle said: "The Army guys don't know anything. They said we needed 500,000 troops in 1991 . Did we need that many to win? No."

What's the Perle Plan? I asked.

"Forty thousand troops." he said ...

http://www.alternet.org/story/13098/





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
44. incredible article...thanx for the link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. LOL. Using Perle's own definition of 'unstable' he himself is unstable.
Ritter, Perle huffed, is "unstable."

Low blow, I said.

Perle claimed he does not call everyone with whom he disagrees "unstable." But, he said, this was an appropriate term for a fellow who had changed his position 180 degrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. Can you believe the chutzpah of this shyster????
Hey, Nosferatu, we aren't as stupid as your minions in the White House.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. This traitor should be indicted
Rose petals, indeed. Better yet, rendition and torture would more fitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. As always, thank you for that interesting perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. Back it?? It was your idea
Off to the Hague with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Isn't that special? The families of dead soldiers are probably relieved.
NOT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. Buuuulllll ShiiiiT. Pearle, Cheney, Crystal, Wolfowitz and Poppy are murderers
And yah even failed at this!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
36. These guys are the Himmler and Goering of the Iraq War
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 06:39 PM by Alhena
as the Third Reich was collpsing, Himmler and Goering both tried to save their necks and cut a deal with the allies. That's who these swine remind me of.

Cheney and Rumsfeld are more like Goebbels and Keitel- equally despicable in their evil nature, but at least they are still on the sinking ship. I grudgingly have a tiny bit more respect for Cheney and Rumsfeld for this reason.

By the way, read the link on my sig- it's a letter from Perle and others way back in 1998 trying to sell Clinton on this harebrained war. He finally gets his war and now he wants to deny responsibilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
37. This is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS. They want to latch on to the Democrats.
Yes, rats leaving a sinking ship, but doing it before the election gives them reason to say they helped the Dems win and therefore deserve a voice in the new order of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman, Michael Rubin, David Frum all recanting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #38
51. Not recanting so much as pointing fingers to avoid their share of the blame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. All neocon war criminals who should be tried for war crimes along with
the Bush cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Aye, I Just Told Someone
They're taking the Johnny Bravo suit back to the cleaners, to get it ready for their next pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
57. They want to latch on like HIV. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
40. F**K YOU perle
Another neo-con trying to save his own ass.

Rat meet lifeboat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
41. Too little, too late...
... too many dead bodies, MFer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
48. Read Richard Perle's political bio
and come to your own conclusions as to how much he has influenced our government policies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Perle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittPoliSci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
49. bwaaahahahaha!
it's so amazing watching the rats leave the sinking ship...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaRa Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
53. while I echo the F*** You chorus going on here,
I do so enjoy the "he holds President Bush responsible" part. When the hell has Georgie boy EVER taken responsibility for anything bad? Nice to see one of his whores turning on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
55. PERLE - 'I WAS NOT WRONG ON IRAQ' (recants recant)
...Vanity Fair has come out with its usual election eve hit job. This time it selectively quotes leading neocons on their views respecting the war, editing their lengthy remarks to suggest dissatisfaction with the Administration and the war. Michael Rubin has already responded, as has David Frum.

Quote from Perle: ...I should have known better than to trust the editors at Vanity Fair who lied to me and to others who spoke with Mr. Rose. Moreover, in condensing and characterizing my views for their own partisan political purposes, they have distorted my opinion about the situation in Iraq and what I believe to be in the best interest of our country.

...We are on the right path.


http://americanthinker.com/comments.php?comments_id=6530
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. Duh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
58. BBC World Service report today
I was listening to the Beeb today and they had a report about these neocons. It seemed they were disappointed with the invasion not so much as it was wrong and illegal, but because the outcome is a disaster. But none of them said it shouldn't have been done. On the contrary. My impression is that all the juicy oil profits they were counting on for themselves haven't panned out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
59. So, the Asshats who lobbied for the attack for YEARS
decide it was a bad idea.


File this one in the :wtf: files!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
60. Big fat rat jumps ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
62. Nothing more than a rat deserting his ship as it goes down.
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 09:55 AM by Seabiscuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
63. "But I guess....
...that me and people like William Kristol, well, we just LOVE war so much. It makes us feel so macho and powerful. I mean, we would never FIGHT in any wars, but we just LOVE to see other people die in wars. Its the ultimate rush, dont you think? And besides, whod have ever thought that our president wouldnt make all the right choices, and run this war like the brilliant man that he is, huh????".... WHAT AN ASSHOLE!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
66. He is still doing propaganda...
while he is supposedly repudiating his support.

the U.S. might have been able to strip Saddam Hussein of his ability to build unconventional weapons "by means other than a direct military intervention."

concerns us most, which is Saddam supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorists,'

he blamed disloyalty among top Bush administration officials for a failure to get the policy correct.

"Huge mistakes were made, and I want to be very clear on this: They were not made by neoconservatives, who had almost no voice in what happened, and certainly almost no voice in what happened after the downfall of the regime in Baghdad," he said.

Interesting that Perle still wants to 'catapult' the ONLY legal defense he has under international law; national security.

Also interesting that he is also fronting for the current rationale of this same administration using the same rhetoric regarding everyone from Venezuela to Iran by basically saying that it's would have been a successful strategy, if done by other people.

As a neo-con he is still promoting the 're-mapping of the middle east' based on some undocumented 'security' threat.

In fact for all we know, Perle might be lying again and actually believes what is going on in Iraq (civil war followed by partition both favoured by the Saudis and Israel as well as neo-cons) was an intended result....this is just damage control for the inevitable blowback any unpopular illegal war causes in domestic politics and the GOP base needs to see a couple of them fall on their swords. He really hasn't repudiated a single thing.

None of these interviews seem much like the 'neo culpeas' they are billed as -- if anything these read more like '08 positioning; the policy was wrong, but the threat still exists. Image Softeners


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
67. Too late, Dick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
68. So the rats are leaving a sinking ship, the one whose hulk they
chewed the holes in, and conveniently blaming it on the captain. It's all his fault that there are holes that are letting in the water and sinking the ship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC