Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama on Rezko Land Deal: It Was a Mistake

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 05:38 PM
Original message
Obama on Rezko Land Deal: It Was a Mistake
I was glad to read this article. I was especially relieved to read that the sellers of the house Obama purchased had the house for sale for several months and that Obama's offer was the highest. The main thing I was worried about was that it might develop that Obama had gotten a sweetheart price on the house, which might have allowed opponents to say Rezko was secretly subsidizing the purchase of the house. So while I agree Obama should have been more careful about dealing with Rezko at all, I look for this story to be a footnote rather than a major scandal.


http://www.suntimes.com/124189,obama05.article

November 4, 2006

BY DAVE MCKINNEY AND CHRIS FUSCO Staff Reporters
U.S. Sen. Barack Obama expressed regret late Friday for his 2005 land purchase from now-indicted political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko in a deal that enlarged the senator’s yard.

“I consider this a mistake on my part and I regret it,” Obama told the Chicago Sun-Times in an exclusive and revealing question-and-answer exchange about the transaction.

In June 2005, Obama and Rezko purchased adjoining parcels in Kenwood. The state’s junior senator paid $1.65 million for a Georgian revival mansion, while Rezko paid $625,000 for the adjacent, undeveloped lot. Both closed on their properties on the same day.

Last January, aiming to increase the size of his sideyard, Obama paid Rezko $104,500 for a strip of his land.

The transaction occurred at a time when it was widely known Tony Rezko was under investigation by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and as other Illinois politicians befriended by Rezko distanced themselves from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is very good news. And John Kerry could take a page out of this
for his own good.

Rezko is shit on steroids. watch for him to undermine the lives of dozens of high ranking Ds and Rs throughout the state. Although many in power, on both sides, require little inducement for any crime. They seem to be genetically predisposed to line their own pockets first.

I am glad to hear this. this will help him immeasurably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is good news for Obama
but what's the Kerry slam for. If you mean the SBVT, this is not in the ballpark. This is a legitamate question asked by a Chicago newspaper. Kerry has always honestly answered questions on his life - and has a reputation of being a very clean politician.

A better analogy would be Clinton and Whitewater - where Clinton didn't provide much information at the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. no slam intended.
And Kerry's flap was a flop for the GOP. They could have attacked any candidate in any race, and made hay by lying like they normally do. But, luckily for us, they concentrated on Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I don't think it was lucky
Kerry is the strongest voice we have now on Iraq. I'm also concerned that the party could try to keep him from pushing for the policies needed for Iraq. This whole thing gives power to Hillary who is somewhere between Kerry and Lieberman - and I can;t say closer to which one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Murtha? Biden? Durbin? Pelosi?
all stronger on IraqNam or at least as strong as Kerry. Plus, they have the added advantage of not suffering from "Da Mare from Chicago disease", in terms of speaking ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Your entitled to your opinion - I also meaning authoring plans,
But Biden's plan was said by the NYT and other papers as being not acceptable to the Iraqis. If it were the best idea, the Kerry/Feingold called for a regional summit that could choose something like that. The key being that the US (read colonial power) should not be the one drawing the lines.

Murtha is excellent and he is a very good speaking about the troops. Kerry/Feingold was a far more comprehensive plan that Murtha was to some degree moving towards. Pelosi and Durbin have, to my knowledge not been leading on this issue. Durbin - my second favorite Senator - is the Democratic whip and he often has spoken on this issue very well.

Carl Levin, the ranking member on the Armed Services committee is someone who will be involved. My hope is that Kerry will be allowed to be one of the leaders. Kerry has been excellent speaking about Iraq in SERIOUS policy speeches - he is far less good on jokes. He also was in this campaign in the roll of attacking Bush - which is dangerous and I assume even if he didn't make this mistake that without spin would be ignored) some line he said if only something about our troops can't win this militarilly would have been used to similar effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Excuse me?
Kerry has been crystal clear on Iraq.

It is an immoral war. We need to get out.

Sorry that is incomprehensible to some people. It seem's pretty clear to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Excuse me?
When John Kerry was considering an investment deal, he contacted a lawyer and when it didn't look completely ethical, he backed out of it. How in the world do you excuse Obama for actually having terrible judgment on this deal and then believe John Kerry can learn ANY-thing from him?? Claire McCaskill is in some trouble about some offshore business too. Democrats better clean up their own backyards if they're serious about cleaning up Washington. John Kerry can't be compared to any of those kinds of shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wou;d love to see this 1.65 million dollar house--must be nice eh?
and did not even come with enough land--so more had to be purchased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Are there any politicians at all, either
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 07:25 PM by arikara
D or R that aren't at the very least multi-millionaires? Is it any wonder they relate to the corporations more than to the people???

Aaron Russo's AMERICA - FREEDOM TO FASCISM presents startling facts about our laws, raising critical issues that Americans must consider if they are to be a free people.

Determined to find the law that requires Americans to pay income tax, Aaron Russo (THE ROSE, TRADING PLACES) sets out on a journey. Neither left- nor right-wing, this startling examination exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties in America. Through interviews with US Congressmen, a former IRS Commissioner, former IRS and FBI agents, tax attorneys and authors, Russo connects the dots between money creation, federal income tax, voter fraud, the national identity card (becoming law in May 2008) and the implementation of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology to track citizens. A striking case about the evolving police state in America.

See the complete video here, it's an amazing documentary.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-431273027...

...issue of republican vs democrat as if they don't get it, and I say look... here's the way you get it. Its organized crime. All you do is you call the republicans the Genoveses and you call the democrats the Gambinos.

The people at the top, they treat it like a crap game, like its their crap game like they're making lots of money. Occasionally somebody at the table shoots each other, but the moment anything threatens their crap game they all unite to protect it. They're both controlled by the same financial and economic interests.

Website

http://www.freedomtofascism.com/



edit: grammar...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks for drawing my attention
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 06:48 AM by edwardlindy
Unfortunately that link has been broken / removed by Google ?

here's the correct one : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198 &hl=en

edit to include correct/later link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I hope you got as much out of it as I did
Thanks for the link update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. The ruling class has to live very opulently. It always makes me suspicious of their
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 08:44 AM by FreeStateDemocrat
desire for the finer things and where this desire turns to greed and then to corruption. My opinion of Obama has dropped dramatically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Just another example of his poor judgment
People who consider him to be some sort of "rising star" are going to be very disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. That is not a lot of money to pay for a house


He has certainly made more than that just on his book alone.

He deserves to place his family in any house he can afford and he can well afford it.

Living in Los Angeles that would not hardly be a Mansion that would be a three bed room house.
Everything is relative and he handled it beautifully IMO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
athena Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Frankly,
if your opinion of someone drops so dramatically upon merely finding out that he is wealthy, then your opinion wasn't worth much to begin with. You should do more research about Obama and his past before you pass judgment. Obama is probably closer to the poor than anyone else in the Senate. He lived for years on very little money, organizing the poor in Chicago. He changed his career so that he could better advocate for the poor. He made all his wealth off the sales of his first book, which he wrote before he got into politics. It's a well-written, meaningful, and touching book, and deserves to be read widely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. It's crazy that we have all of these elites "representing" us in Washington
Somebody with a $1.65m house doesn't have any honest clue about what most Americans are dealing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bliss_eternal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Respectfully, not necessarily...
how did Obama grow up? Did he grow up living in a mansion? Has he always been "wealthy"?

It's one thing to grow up with the proverbial silver spoon in your mouth (i.e. gw bush jr.)and not "get" what it means to be poor, middle class, etc. We've all seen that in *. His base is the wealthy and he can't (and won't) relate to anyone that's not what he is. It's something altogether different to acquire wealth later in life and live accordingly, but still be able to relate to one's roots. For example, Clinton was wealthy, but I've never felt he was a poor representative of the people. He "got" us. His policies seemed to try to address the issues of all human beings--regardless of their yearly income.

Is it really fair to judge others on their homes, earnings, etc.? Don't we, as progressives try to see beyond the superficial of people? I would think that would extend to our representatives as well. It's not fair to lump everyone together based on the cost of the house they can buy.

I hope that you can forgive my contradiction of your statement--I'm not trying to flame you.:) I'm merely offering another perspective to consider.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
athena Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. You need to read his book. He wasn't always wealthy.
The book is Dreams From My Father. He gave up his corporate job to spend years organizing some of the poorest communities in Chicago. It was only when he realized he could help them more as a civil lawyer that he went back to law school. As he points out in his interviews, he had little money until he wrote his book, which sold well especially after his 2004 speech at the DNC.

He probably knows much more about what most Americans are dealing with than you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Whitewater ring a bell?
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 02:07 AM by SoCalDem
A moptivated media can raise a stink about anything..and we all know the repubes will stoke those fires until Grandma's last chair has been burned..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. yikes -- another land deal nonstory.
Obama is smart to get out ahead of this nonsense now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. LOL ! Grandma's last chair
is a new one. Love that expression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Again, like Whitewater, the scandal that wasn't.
Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC