Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: G.O.P. Glum as It Struggles to Hold Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:08 PM
Original message
NYT: G.O.P. Glum as It Struggles to Hold Congress
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/us/politics/05elect.html?hp&ex=1162702800&en=2053acbcb6f551e1&ei=5094&partner=homepage

The battle for Congress rolled into a climactic final weekend with Republican Party leaders saying the best outcome they could foresee was losing 12 seats in the House. But they were increasingly steeling themselves to the loss of at least 15 and therefore control of the House for the first time in 12 years.

Democrats and Republicans said the battle over the Senate had grown fluid going into the final hours before the elections Tuesday. Democrats said they thought they were almost certain to gain four or five seats and still had a shot at the six they need to take control. Republicans were pouring money into Senate races in Michigan and Maryland this weekend to take advantage of what they described as last-minute opportunities, however slight, in states currently held by Democrats.

Party strategists on both sides, speaking in interviews after they had finished conducting their last polls and making their final purchases of television time, said they were running advertisements in more than 50 Congressional districts this weekend, far more than anyone thought would be in play at this stage.

Nearly all of those seats are held by Republicans, underscoring the degree to which President Bush and his party have been forced onto the defensive two years after he claimed that his re-election had given him the political capital to carry out an ambitious domestic and foreign agenda.

As the final weekend began, the parties made their final tactical moves as candidates sparred over the war, the economy, corruption and competence and as elaborate get-out-the-vote campaigns were rolled out. At stake was not just control of the House and the Senate, but also potentially the course of the Bush presidency in its last two years and the debate over how to proceed in Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. W's agenda was to please the rich and religious right
He forgot about us "common" folks and that we do vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Call me a worry-wart, but I'm not liking all these articles about the "glum"
Republicans. It gives me a sick feeling in my gut. Sort of like all those exit polls calling for Kerry to win, just to see it fade away as the results were being reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. glum=low thug voter turnout.
glum=losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember how depressed and mean the Repubs were when "poppy Bush" lost.
It took them about a week to really believe it had happend. You talk about a bunch hysterical, mean-spirited, and low-down folks on the Hill. It took over a year for the Hill bunch to recover. They couldn't believe it had happened to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. back in the 2000 "election"
I talked to one in Texas from my office in NJ. He was even a bush appointee. He told me that if they didn't win, there would be "blood in the streets." That's how passionate they were about a republican takeover back in 2000.

So now they're "glum." All the way from "blood in the streets" to "glum." My what a road they've traveled and in such a short time.




Cher

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe they will all quit politics and just stick to religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick for the headline!
:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC