Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Automated GOP calls may break N.H. law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:04 AM
Original message
Automated GOP calls may break N.H. law


The National Republican Congressional Committee acknowledges that its automated phone program on behalf of a local congressman may violate New Hampshire law, but said that it would continue, despite opposition from local party leaders.

"We are a federal organization campaigning about a federal race," said Burgos. "We feel that New Hampshire law does not apply to what we are doing."



http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/11/05/automated_gop_calls_may_break_nh_law/

Absolutely stunning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't they learned not to mess with NH?
After the phone-jamming convictions, you'd think they'd smarten up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. These fuckers are messing around in my "live free or die" state again?
I'm telling you, NH is going to go blue at some point in the future and these fuckers are going to be sent packing for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. It already is
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 10:17 AM by sarge43
Yesterday's poll had Paul Hodes within one percentage point of Chuckie Bass. Lynch (Dem and Gov)is 68% to what'shisname's 28.

Yeah, don't tell Graniteheads "we don't need your stinkin' laws." They gets cranky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I liked the poll where Hodes was up 6 points better!
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 10:21 AM by Mr_Spock
Still, NH has one of the most Republican state legislatures in the country (at least that's my impression) - lots of work to do here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Oooo, nice
Yeah, the leg is just about wall to wall Repubs. The northern counties like Coos will stay Repub for a long time to come, but down in the Iron Triangle the demographics are changing rapidly to blue, so time to get to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yup, I think there is a lot of growth potential here for DFA etc...
A win for a Dem US Congressman would really help to motivate folks though!

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yes it would
Time for the good doctor to send some big bucks upcheer. Time to get serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeniB Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. NOT FOR LONG...............
By Wednesday morning our legislature will be Democratic!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Send them to JAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. If they admit doing it in NH then they are doing it in every state AND
in Indiana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. No, they learned their lesson in Indiana, but it's backfiring nevertheless - LOL
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010802.php

In a year in which Republicans are blasting immigrants and trying to exploit xenophobia for political gain, Rep. Mark Souder (R-IN) is denouncing the phone bank calls made in support of his campaign by the NRCC because the live callers have such heavy Indian or Hispanic accents.

...
The NRCC calls were supposed to attack Hayhurst as "bad on immigration" or as a proponent of higher taxes. Here's the immigration call script:

“The United States now is home to 11 million illegal immigrants, and the number grows every year. But instead of protecting our borders, congressional candidate Tom Hayhurst supports citizenship opportunities for illegal aliens.”


According to the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette, Souder said "he was especially exasperated that a phone message about immigration was delivered by people with heavy accents."

Now, here's the kicker. Typically, the NRCC would use automated robocalls to deliver this kind of message. But because robocalls are illegal in Indiana and because the Indiana Attorney General has already successfully sued one GOP 527 group, the Economic Freedom Fund, to stop such calls, the NRCC is being forced to use live callers, a task which it has apparently outsourced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't get this.
What's the point of a Federal "Do Not Call" list if telemarketers (and political campaigns) are going to use that list to find numbers to call? Why isn't it a Federal crime (as opposed to a state crime) to call someone on the Federal "Do Not Call" list?

My number is on the Federal "Do Not Call" list, and I have gotten several recorded slander messages against my Congresscritter (Marshall GA-03 D-but barely) supporting his opposition, Mac Collins (R). I will feel like an idiot for putting my number on the list if people are just going to use the list as a database of people to call.

Unenforceable? New Hampshire law doesn't apply when making a call into New Hampshire? I can see how it would be hard to serve a complaint and get jurisdiction over a California company in New Hampshire, but I am still mystified that violation of the Federal "Do Not Call" list is not a Federal crime.

Can anyone with more knowledge of the subject give us some insight as to what's going on here?

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You know the GOP...
They'll agree to stop doing it on Nov. 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Charities and political campaigns...
...are exempt from the federal "do not call" list. Always were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not saying you are wrong, but...
if that is so, why would they acknowledge "that its automated phone program on behalf of a local congressman may violate New Hampshire law..."

In other words: if there is an exemption, then you are breaking no laws, thus no need for an acknowledgement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. AHA!!! Per the article linked in the OP...
<snip>
Federal law allows campaigns and parties to call those on the federal do-not-call list. But under a 2004 state law, delivering prerecorded political messages to numbers on any federal do-not-call list is a violation, punishable by a fine of $5,000 per call.
</snip>

It's not the call, it's the recording!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. I did not know that.
Thanks.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. From the horse's mouth...
From http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/dncalrt.htm>http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/dncalrt.htm:

--------------------
29. If I register my number on the National Do Not Call Registry, will it stop all telemarketing calls?

No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will stop most telemarketing calls, but not all. Because of limitations in the jurisdiction of the FTC and FCC, calls from or on behalf of political organizations, charities, and telephone surveyors would still be permitted, as would calls from companies with which you have an existing business relationship, or those to whom you’ve provided express agreement in writing to receive their calls.

30. Are calls from political organizations or calls soliciting for charities covered?

Political solicitations are not covered by the TSR at all, since they are not included in its definition of “telemarketing.” Charities are not covered by the requirements of the national registry. However, if a third-party telemarketer is calling on behalf of a charity, a consumer may ask not to receive any more calls from, or on behalf of, that specific charity. If a third-party telemarketer calls again on behalf of that charity, the telemarketer may be subject to a fine of up to $11,000.


--------------------

The state stuff, however, I can't really comment on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's Just Stupid
Even if it isn't illegal (I think polticial and religious organizations are exempt from "Do Not Call" and "No Soliciting" rules) it's dumb.

If some one is on a Do Not Call registry or has a No Solicting sign and you call/knock on their door - they are probably not going to have warm and fuzzy feelings about you or the person/group you represent. And while maybe you won't be fined or jailed, you will likely lose a voter.

When I am canvassing, I generally avoid houses with No Soliciting signs as a matter of courtesy. It is better than responding to ticked off voter with a lesson on law and civics. If I am phone banking and some one says they are on a Do Not Call list, I apologize, politely mention that it does not apply to political campaigns and offer to remove them from our list.

But, the Republicans can just keep right on making those calls to people who don't want to be bothered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Branjor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm on the federal do not call list too
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 10:23 AM by Branjor
but still got several repub and dem recorded calls.

What REALLY ticked me off is that I got 3 repub recordings left on my answering machine, all of which I had to listen to before erasing them.

I'm in NJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm in VA, on the do not call list, got recording of Newt Gingrich last week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. I signed up for DoNotCall on the web and I thought it said something
about it not applying to political parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ugh!
Sorry Chief, we don't recognize that treaty, Great Father (True Parents) not recognize deal made by enemy tribe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Anyone taking it to court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeniB Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. I'm sure they will.
Democratic Party chair Kathy Sullivan is pretty feisty. She won't let this go. She's a lawyer and made sure that the perpetrators of the last phone jamming stunt were prosecuted. I'm sure if there's a legal leg to stand on she'll fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. Silly Americans, Republicans don't have to follow laws
sarcasm on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. We don't need no stinking laws.
don't need no sinking badges either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. laws are for losers
GOP has plenty of dirty money and too many lawyers. Why would they pay attention to laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. Oh, I sincerely hope they are corrected on that little error.
Five years in a state penitentiary would be completely acceptable to me. With daily instruction on the US constitution and the meaning of a federal system.

If the penalty is not at least five years, current laws really need to be amended. A mugging hurts a few people....this mugging hurts a state.

An honest government would be issuing warrants as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Me too nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. the Bushies make their own reality
and their own laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. Like so many laws, the "Do Not Call" law was deliberately written so that...
Edited on Sun Nov-05-06 02:30 PM by Tesha
Like so many laws, the "Do Not Call" law was
deliberately written so that it assuredly
didn't apply to the assholes who wrote it.

*THEY* still have the freedom to drag us away
from our dinners.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. The "States' Rights!" party strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. To make matters worse,
the calls are repeated numerous times and are down and out harrassing. The caller gives the impression it's someone from the Democratic campaign calling and bugging the hell out of them, hoping they'll become pissed off and stay home on Tuesday. (This from a local campaign organizer.) Damn - the state prison's going to need a wing just for the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FernBell Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
33. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
35. email Keith O - ask him to do a story on this robo calling tonight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
37. This said by the "State's Rights" party?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC