Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House member wants e-voting paper trail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:05 PM
Original message
House member wants e-voting paper trail
WASHINGTON - Citing the disputed vote in a Florida congressional district, a Democratic lawmaker on Wednesday urged Congress to approve his measure requiring a paper trail for electronic voting.

Rep. Rush Holt (news, bio, voting record), sponsor of the bill, said the inaccuracy of electronic touch-screen voting machines "poses a direct threat to the integrity of our electoral system." The New Jersey congressman argued the Florida district, in which more than 18,000 votes have gone uncounted, has exposed the system's flaws.

Florida law requires a recount in all five southwest Florida counties in the 13th Congressional District. But scrutiny is focused on Sarasota County, where touch-screen voting machines recorded that 18,382 people — 13 percent of voters in the Nov. 7 election — did not vote for either Republican Vern Buchanan or Democrat Christine Jennings, despite casting ballots in other races on the ballot. That rate was much higher than other counties in the district.

Rep. Robert Wexler (news, bio, voting record), D-Fla., said he found it "unfathomable" that more than 18,000 people would cast votes in other races but not in the congressional race. He added there's a host of theories that could explain what happened to those votes, but without a paper trail no one knows the truth.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_on_go_co/electronic_voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republican lawmakers will agree but only in districts where they lost.
I can easily imagine this scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is not a partisan issue. We need hand counted paper ballots
now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need hand-counted paper ballots, not a *paper trail*.
Kucinich's HR 6200 looks to be what the Doctor ordered.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.6200:


SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Paper Ballot Act of 2006'.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING USE OF HAND-COUNTED PAPER BALLOTS IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS.

Section 301(a) of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15481(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

`(7) SPECIAL RULES FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS- Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, in the case of a regularly scheduled general election for the electors of President and Vice President (beginning with the election in November 2008), the following rules shall apply:

`(A) The State shall conduct the election using only paper ballots.

`(B) The State shall ensure that the number of ballots cast at a precinct or equivalent location which are placed inside a single box or similar container does not exceed 500.

`(C) The ballots cast at a precinct or equivalent location shall be counted by hand by election officials at the precinct, and a representative of each political party with a candidate on the ballot, as well as any interested member of the public, may observe the officials as they count the ballots. The previous sentence shall not apply with respect to provisional ballots cast under section 302(a).'.

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Copperred Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. OPEN SOURCE VOTING IS THE ANSWER


www.openvoting.org

www.openvoting.org

www.openvoting.org


EVERYONE PLEASE JOIN THEIR MAILING LIST


THEY LITERALLY HAVE THE SOLUTION.....

OPEN SOURCE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Open Source voting is not the answer.
Check out some of the recent threads here from those of us with lots of experience building and securing mission critical systems. Paper ballots, hand counted is the only robust and reliable method.

Just consider one attack vector for this wonderful open sorce system: Just hide a latent piece of software in the hardware being assembled for this purpose -- how secure can you make the manufacturing lines for every component that contains any type of microcode -- graphics, disk, scanner, whatever. Now keep anyone with access to the machines from allowing any corruption to this system-wide integrity.

I am a strong advocate for Open Source Software, but not for counting votes.

I am just very paranoid and have over 40 years of experience with all types of COTS, OSS, embedded, and hardened systems.

(So paranoid I usually use a version of w3m to browse the web. -- Open Source )


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. we need to get rid of the "Hack America's Vote Act"
..and replace it with a one size fits all solution with standard requirements nation-wide for every working part on an election, from registration to accurate results, with serious consequences for any tampering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll go a step further
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 04:57 PM by Jack Rabbit
I want the paper to be a ballot that cast and counted. There is no need to keep vote tallies in the machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree. Holt should update that bill to paper *ballots*. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC