Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US bugged Diana's phone on night of death crash

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:11 PM
Original message
US bugged Diana's phone on night of death crash
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1968664,00.html

The American secret service was bugging Princess Diana's telephone conversations without the approval of the British security services on the night she died, according to the most comprehensive report on her death, to be published this week.

Among extraordinary details due to emerge in the report by former Metropolitan police commissioner Lord Stevens is the revelation that the US security service was bugging her calls in the hours before she was killed in a car crash in Paris.

In a move that raises fresh questions over transatlantic agreements on intelligence-sharing, the surveillance arm of the US has admitted listening to her conversations as she stayed at the Ritz hotel, but failed to notify MI6. Stevens is understood to have been assured that the 39 classified documents detailing Diana's final conversations did not reveal anything sinister or contain material that might help explain her death.

Scotland Yard's inquiry, published this Thursday, also throws up further intelligence links with the Princess of Wales on the night she died. The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul, was in the pay of the French equivalent of M15. Stevens traced £100,000 he had amassed in 14 French bank accounts though no payments have been linked to Diana's death.

Stevens's conclusion is that Diana, her companion Dodi Fayed, and Paul himself died in an accident caused by Paul driving too fast through the Pont de l'Alma underpass in Paris while under the influence of drink. The car was being pursued by photographers at the time.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. What earthly reason would the US need or want to bug her calls?
Makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Perhaps something to do with her landmines activism
She wasn't much beloved by the military industrial complex...

and who's the boss of the "deciders"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
58. Good Point. Otherwise that was
my question, too..why in all that's sane was Diana Princess of Wales' phone being tapped by the US? Terrorism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
61. It was under Clinton's watch
Why? Please explain Big Dog why Diana's concern over landmines was such an overriding factor that you authorized spying on her. Or did you have some prurient interest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Wasn't Adnan Khashoggi Dodi's uncle or something?
That alone makes me reach for the tinfoil hat.

:tinfoilhat:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. She was dating an Egyptian
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 11:39 PM by bezdomny
whose mother was the sister of a famous arms dealer.

I'm not sure how many degrees of Kevin Bacon the CIA likes to play, but maybe they were more interested in him than her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. and she was carrying the baby
that would have made the royal family 'tainted' racially.

That cull was long predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Clinton had the hots for her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Henny Penny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Knowledge is power....!
They like to build up large databases of information that can be used to "exert leverage" on recalcitrant politicians, business leaders etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. I disagree, I don't think Clinton, Gore, Kerry and Edwards are Republicans in disguise
But hey, that's just me. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conservdem Donating Member (880 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. I agree and
would like to get a truthful explanation for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. You said it. WTF?
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 11:18 PM by FormerRushFan
So, I imagine there are things about Diana we haven't been told about....?

on edit: SORRY - this was meant to follow up to reply #1...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not the CIA, not the FBI, but the Secret Service? Under Clinton?
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 11:37 PM by Poll_Blind
  Well, I gotta believe Scotland Yard but it's very, very strange. From WikiPedia, on the role of the Secret Service:

The Secret Service has primary jurisdiction over the prevention of counterfeiting of U.S. currency and U.S. treasury bonds and notes, as well as protection of the President, Vice President, their immediate families, other high ranking government officials, past presidents and their spouses, certain candidates for the offices of President and Vice President, and visiting foreign heads of state and government (all called "protectees"). It also investigates a wide variety of financial fraud crimes and identity theft and provides forensics assistance for some local crimes. The Secret Service Uniformed Division assists in the protection of foreign embassies within Washington, D.C.


  Sounds like a good FIOA request, really.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. I suspect the author of the piece doesn't know the difference
which is why it's lower cases s "secret service."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
49. Maybe Clinton was having her watched for her own sake?
Maybe he and Hillary or one or the other were friends enough to think that perhaps some one was after her (whether anyone was or not)?

Or maybe Bill had slept with her at some point, it wouldn't surprise me. Isn't it the patriotic duty of a President to cuckold the future king of England if the opportunity presents itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. LOL! I...I...Hell Yeah! Stick it to the Monarchy for Paine! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Every time I read this kind of stuff, I want to leave the US!
Why the hell are we always sticking our nose in everybody elses business? I'm so sick ofit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. What does it matter..
It took almost an hour for help to arrive to get her to hospital.
Why nothing is said about that is bewildering..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. There was a lot said about it.
They said the French prefer to stabilize at the scene of the accident rather than move the victim immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. That is the point...
She was never stabilized at the scene. Photogs were there taking her picture as she lay dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlwaysQuestion Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. Report not at all surprising
Is anyone at all surprised that the investigation turned out as it did? It came out as I would expect 90 percent thought that it would. I'm still not buying that the chauffeur was drunker than a hoot owl (unless the few drinks that he may have had prior to getting into the car had been spiked). With the amount of alcohol that they say was in his system would have made him smell like a brewery. Besides, I'd still like to know the last time anyone ever heard of a chauffeur or chauffeur designate of a prominent person ever having been cited for drunk driving or for being in an accident while under the influence?

In any event, even if the chief investigator had found suspicious information and evidence pointing to....oh I don't know, the royal family or Great Britain's secret police that that information would not be permitted to come out. Not that it matters a whit, but I still think intuitively that there's something fishy about her death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It's fishier than ever.
Until I read this article, I thought there was nothing fishy at all. Now I think we actually know very little about what was going on. This looks like a typical CIA set-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Absolutely!
If this professional driver - who was on duty - was given to drinking inappropriately, doesn't anyone with common sense think he would have been fired long ago? He was entrusted with the son of a highly important man AND the Princess of Wales, mother of the future King of England. Let's get real here!

While it is certainly possible that it could have been an accident, the explanations that have been given are woefully inadequate and inconsistent. But looking back at history, if JFK's assassination still has many unanswered questions, and was subject to much mishandling, how much more the death of the princess and Fayed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
50. ITA with "spiked" or drugged up even worse.
This stinks beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. al - FAYED BELIEVES PRINCE PHILIP WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CRASH
Diana died on my son's birthday..and I took it very hard..as i had gotten to meet her in Toronto several years prior..she was extraordinary!!..So sweet and sooo beautiful!!
SHE WILL ALWAYS HAVE A PIECE OF MY HEART!!
FLY


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/532499.stm
Monday, 22 November, 1999, 19:11 GMT
Al-Fayed challenges Duke to sue

snip:
Mr al-Fayed called on Prince Philip to sue him over his allegations that the Duke had "masterminded" a conspiracy to kill the Princess of Wales and his son Dodi.

Seeking to establish a pattern of persistent dishonesty, Mr Hamilton's lawyer, Desmond Browne QC, asked Mr al-Fayed about his controversial theory that the deaths of Diana and his son, Dodi, was caused by the British security services and his claims that Diana and Dodi planned to marry.



snip:

The Egyptian-born businessman stood by his earlier claim that Prince Philip was responsible for the fatal 1997 car crash.

snip:

Mr Browne suggested: "You believed at this time, did you not, that the crash had not been an accident, but the result of a conspiracy?"

He replied: "I have the right to believe everything. I have the right to find out how my son has been killed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
16. Stinks...
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 04:25 AM by Raine
the entire thing of something very fishy. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. What's the deal with the white Fiat Uno?
It seems suspicious that another car collided with the Mercedes before the crash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. Wasn't that the car that was found a few days later that had been
torched with the driver inside somewhere in the Bois de Boulogne?

It's kind of like 9/11 - if there was no foul play or conspiracy involved then why so many coverups? If it was just an accident then what is there to cover up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. No wonder we're paranoid.
Stock up on aluminum foil--we're gonna need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe it had more to do with surveillance of powerful Saudis than Diana
:shrug:

Still, it's disturbing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. What's disturbing
is that as the tenth year anniversary of the event approaches, we will be even more inundated by Diana worship crap. It's simple, people, she lived life in the fast lane, and people who do that sometimes crash and burn. I'm completely sick of all the royals that Mort Kondrake has properly called "Eurotrash".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. I'll take "Eurotrash" William and Harry over the Bush bimbos any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
45. Sorry
but that's like deciding that Moe was the 'smart' Stooge.


Spoiled rich kids, all of them. They deserve our contempt, which should properly be displayed by ignoring their idiocy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. Let's see Barb and Jenna do this.
Prince Harry: I'll fight in Iraq war
Evening Standard (London), Feb 1, 2006 by ROBERT JOBSON

PRINCE Harry is to be sent to Iraq next year as a troop commander and is likely to patrol the hazardous border with Iran, defence sources have revealed.

The prince, who is third in line to the throne, has repeatedly told friends of his determination to serve in the front line if his fellow soldiers are sent to the war zone.

The news comes after the death of the 100th British soldier in Iraq but it will delight Harry, who has gone on record to say he hopes to become an armoured reconnaissance troop leader at the forefront of Army operations. In an interview to mark his 21st birthday in September, Harry insisted he would be willing to serve once his training days as Officer Cadet Wales are over.

"There's no way I'm going to put myself through Sandhurst and then sit on my a**e back home while my boys are out fighting for their country," he said.


http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4153/is_20060201/ai_n16036645



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-12-06 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #48
62. It will be interesting
to see if he wears a British uniform, or his Nazi shirt...



In any case, any heir to the throne would have dozens of his fellow soldiers protecting him for this photo op. They're the ones I worry about! As a matter of fact, I worry for anyone from the US or Britain who is currently (or about to be) in Iraq. Instead of lionizing Harry for his gung-ho attitude, I wish he would spend some time trying to get the UK out of Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. I've believed for a while that her land mines campaign
might have been the reason for her death, if there was a conspiracy,
rather than the fact that she was having an affair with a Muslim.

If she had lived and carried on her work, it would definitely have
given the campaign to ban land mines a very high profile. And that
would have made the military-industrial complex very nervous indeed.

Would they kill a member of Britiain's Royal Family to protect their
financial interests? I think we can all guess the answer to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. somebody mispelled her name as Princess "Die",so she ended up in
their "die" file,so they killed her.perfectly understandable mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. That, and the "Dodi" / "Dodo" typo ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Oy,the "extinction" file. You don't want them finding your name in there
They chop down your whole family tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. yes, there is something fishy here
I miss her, she was a wonderful woman who made a difference in a lot of people's lives. She didn't have to spend time on the programs she devoted her time to. Also, she was a wild card, she did what she liked. Look at it this way, who does it benefit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yea! Our tax dollars well spent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. dupe.
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 09:06 PM by superconnected
dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. I'm normally not a conspiricist, but gee, the news in this article is ripe for conspiracy.
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 09:05 PM by superconnected
Right down to the US gov tapping her phone, and her driver having 100k pounds in the bank, wtf, a limo driver? That's more than 1.25 times that in US dollars.

I find it hard to believe her limo driver would have 3 times the legal amt of alcohol and they admit samples were mixed up.

There could have very well been a conspiracy here. Too may powerful, fucked up poeple involved.


--------------

"Scotland Yard's inquiry, published this Thursday, also throws up further intelligence links with the Princess of Wales on the night she died. The driver of the Mercedes, Henri Paul, was in the pay of the French equivalent of M15. Stevens traced £100,000 he had amassed in 14 French bank accounts though no payments have been linked to Diana's death.

Stevens's conclusion is that Diana, her companion Dodi Fayed, and Paul himself died in an accident caused by Paul driving too fast through the Pont de l'Alma underpass in Paris while under the influence of drink. The car was being pursued by photographers at the time.

Tests have confirmed that Paul was more than three times over the French drink-drive limit and was travelling at 'excessive' speed. The inquiry will quash a number of conspiracy theories that have circulated since 31 August 1997, among them that Diana was pregnant. It also found no evidence that the princess was planning to get engaged to Dodi, son of Mohamed Fayed.

The Harrods tycoon believes that Paul's blood samples were swapped to portray him as a drunk in an elaborate cover-up by the establishment to stop Diana marrying Dodi, a Muslim.

Stevens is expected to concede that while there was a mix-up it was an accident and that the original French post-mortem which found that Paul was three-times over the French drink-drive limit was correct.

He is also expected to discount the role of the white Fiat Uno which struck Diana's car shortly before the crash, even though British police officers have failed to track down the vehicle which left paintwork on the black Mercedes.

The inquiry will support the findings of the original French accident inquiry in criticising the paparazzi as a possible reason for encouraging Paul to speed. The 'bright light' theory - the claim that the driver was deliberately blinded by a beam immediately before the crash - is also dismissed by Stevens."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. Fayed's uncle was none other than Adnan Khashoggi, the .....
notorious Saudi Billionaire, who was a renowned military arms and drug dealer. Good friend of the Bush's going way back.
He was the prominent middle man between the Iran mullahs and Oliver North in the the Iran/contra scandal. Bush SR was VP around this time of course.
Kashoggi also owned Oryx, the investment company which owned Huffman airlines. Huffman was managed by a Wallace Hilliard, a close friend of Jeb Bush's. Huffman owned the now famous flight school in Venice Florida where Mohammad Atta and other terrorists attended flight school. One of his lear Jets was busted some years ago with 43 pounds of heroin on board. The CIA ran the Florida/South American drug operations down there. Khashoggi, the CIA and the Bushes were all pretty tight. Of course the Bin Laden family was part of this mix, and Kashoggi's father was the family Doctor the the Bin Ladens, including Osama.
Let's not forget about the Promis "back door' revolutionary computer system whose program was stolen by the CIA, and used by Osama to elude capture. Khashoggi was involved with that. Maybe Fayed had knowledge to do with that situation.
Richard Perle happened to have a close business assoication from Kashoggi, and Perle was advised on Iraq war profiteering by him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. omg. where did you read all this? it's a bit daunting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. link please! we don't need anymore reasons for tin foil then we already have!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
59. Didn't Khashoggi once employ Teresa LaPore, later to become famous

as the "Democratic" elections supervisor responsible for the "butterfly" ballot that confused many Palm Beach County voters and resulted in many elderly Jewish people voting for Pat Buchanan, thinking they were voting for Al Gore? Ms. LaPore later "became" a Republican, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. Was the Princess a terrorist???
It really is suspicious???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Was the US doing Blair/ Charles a favor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. Such an convenient coincidence...........bring it on.
Why would the US be spying on Diana before she died?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. And we should trust the US not to monitor our phones...
why exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beth9999 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. It doesn't surprise me...
... that the Repugs bugged her phone. It wouldn't surprise me if evidence turned up that they were responsible for her death. (I'm not saying that there is evidence, or that they were responsible... just that if it turns out so, I won't be surprised).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Clinton was in charge during this time
So just how are the Repubs responsible for this particular incident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
44. Obviously they were driving fast to get away from more than photographers
Bless them, their lives were truly not their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
47. Bush's poodle is going to have some 'splainin' to do. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
51. The *real* question is "Who stopped her from wearing her seatbelt that night?"
Because that was a survivable crash, demonstrated by the fact that the front-seat passenger *did* survive.


And Professor Lienhart adds there is one crucial fact people need to know: "What is certain is that she was not wearing a seatbelt and this made things worse.

"We would like to think that if she had been wearing a seatbelt, we'd been able to save her."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6162041.stm



Whether or not someone was out to kill her, somebody decided that night that she wouldn't wear a seatbelt.

Whoever made that decision ultimately prevented her from surviving the crash.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. She did ... she was an adult and used to making her own decisions.
Besides, she was probably giving Dodi a blow-job at the time ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Exactly my point.

The seat-belt thing, that is; not the blow-job. But who knows....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
53. So? Isn't she still dead?
What difference does this make? New information isn't going to make her rise from her grave dressed in haute couteur and diamonds. She's dead and she's going to remain dead. Now unless England and France resurrect their ancient emnity and go back to war against one another, this is a distraction especially for the US with regards to more important things we need to keep our eyes on---like oil companies raking in billions in profits and not paying a dime in taxes especially for their off shore US drilling.

Give us news we can use, not distractions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. She was loved So she had to be assasinated
The Royals couldn't stand her and she knew to much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
60. So THAT's it!!!!1111 They shoulda been bugging OSAMA!!!!111 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC