Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal judge issues split decision on new Military Commissions Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 08:10 PM
Original message
Federal judge issues split decision on new Military Commissions Act
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 08:11 PM by aggiesal
By David G. Savage
Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — In the first legal decision on a federal law that denies access to U.S. courts to detainees
in the war on terrorism, a federal judge ruled Wednesday that foreign prisoners held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba,
could not sue for freedom.

But, in a split decision, U.S. District Judge James Robertson also ruled that the law's denial of that right
to the more than 12 million legal immigrants living in the United States was unconstitutional.

The first part of the ruling affirmed what Congress intended when it passed the Military Commissions Act
in October. The decision came in the case of Salim Hamdan, the onetime driver to Osama bin Laden, who won
what appeared to be a landmark victory in the Supreme Court in June.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003476629_detainees14.html


*************************************************************************************************************

Once again, this administration breaks the law.
The SCOTUS calls them on it.
This administration gets the do-nothing Congress to change the law.
Everything is OK!
Just the way they planned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is why the Bush Administration used Guantánamo in the first place, imo. Technically,
not American territory. And it remains a sleazy end run around habeas corpus.

************** from the article:

"Hamdan was captured in Afghanistan, and Guantánamo Bay is, technically, sovereign territory of Cuba, Robertson noted.

However, the Constitution protects the right of habeas corpus for people living in the United States, the judge said."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-15-06 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. In the Hamdan case, when the SCOTUS first heard it, ...
they ruled that this administration can not keep prisoners with suspended habeas corpus without
consent from congress.

So the administration gets the do-nothing Congress to pass the Military Commissions Act.
At this point, it satisfies the SCOTUS condition that they now have the consent of congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC