Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murtha: U.S. has lost 'militarily' in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:34 PM
Original message
Murtha: U.S. has lost 'militarily' in Iraq
Glad to see he is still on the ball with this.


http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/

Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Murtha: U.S. has lost 'militarily' in Iraq

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Renewing his calls for a complete troop withdrawal from Iraq, Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pennsylvania, told CNN Tuesday he believes America has lost in the region "militarily."

"Militarily we have lost -- there is no question about it, we cannot win this militarily." Murtha told Wolf Blitzer on the "Situation Room."
.........

"There is no way the United States can solve this problem," Murtha said. "We have gotten so far out and we have missed our opportunity, if we ever had an opportunity early on, to stabilize Iraq. Since we didn't do it then, it cannot be done now."

Murtha also sharply criticized the recommendation of sending more troops to Iraq. "They don't have an achievable mission -- a defined mission which they can point to," he said. "What's the point in sending another 40,000 troops?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish the executive branch listen to him
Nothing but truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Like Hitler before him, Bush will listen to no one, and he wants his Gotterdamerung
and he will lead our troops into a funeral pyre thinking that it was G-d's will that compelled him to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. You made me search.
Göt·ter·däm·mer·ung Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

–noun 1. German Mythology. the destruction of the gods and of all things in a final battle with evil powers: erroneous modern translation of the Old Icelandic Ragnarǫk, meaning “fate of the gods,” misunderstood as Ragnarökkr, meaning “twilight of the gods.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Thanks for the translation bahrbearian,
I thought it meant baby pacifier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. LOL N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. America lost "militarily" on October 11, 2002
America cemented that loss on March 19, 2003

America lost "militarily" the very second someone opined that they could recapture the unity of the "greatest generation" by manufacturing a global "war on terror" that would rally the people behind the actions of government.

America lost "militarily" the very instant someone decided the answer to a criminal act was to wage war.

America lost.Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. But we have men and women politicians that think it is weakness
to admit mistake. Very few have called for bringing the troops home now. Even Harry Reed said that he would go along with a limited troop surge.

The American people voted for Democrats to end the war, not become a party to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But which is actually weak? Those that would continue with the lies
or those willing to admit the truth, no matter how ugly?


The weak are those who refuse to tell the truth about Iraq. The weak are those who fear for America's "image" by refusing to admit the obvious - that we should have never invaded Iraq and that there is no "victory", by any definition, to be had in Iraq.

Americans want out of Iraq - any politician that thinks otherwise is a politician intent on selling a lie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. War is easy, fighting for peace is hard
Easy to order troops into battle. It is harder to fight for peace.

Clinton worked hard for peace in the Middle East. Bush ignored the peace process because it was hard work.

And a certain woman that wants to be President thinks that in order to be tough, she has to repeat the same mistakes the men have made about Iraq.

Murtha is as right about Iraq as McGovern was about Vietnam. It is no coincidence that Murtha and McGovern are decorated war heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Murtha's statement is right - but I think we lost before it even began
because we should have never invaded to begin with...and because we invaded for lies and trumped up evidence. Because Bush was President - that alone should have been a caution to everyone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Very true.
As someone so profound as Marvin Gaye said long ago when I was a young woman "War is not the answer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. and politically on January 6, 2001
everything since has been inevitable consequence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. we lost before the mission was "accomplished" unless it was that we lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jack Murtha claims defeat in Iraq? What a shocking development.
I'm stunned. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. thank you, Jack....
....you'd make one-hellava Secretary of Defense, a Secretary who would actually care about his troops....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Murtha would only be saying this if the Active brass are telling
him this.....they know that this is Vietraq and they want to get the hell out...The TetIraq offensive is coming....and they know it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I say you are correct and I am very happy the generals have
someone courageous and honest enough to TELL THE TRUTH to the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. Powell said pretty much the same thing to Bob Schiefer Sunday
What's the mission? How is it defined? Is it achievable? Powell didn't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. Needs to be said & repeated constantly. Kudos to Murtha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. yes, but in listening to Bush pressy today---It seems He has not heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Lost militarily, morally, financially, politcally ... Are there any more ways to lose a war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Sure -- we could have our own Dunkirk-style debacle
If the Shi'a cut off the supply line from the south, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. WE cannot stabilize Iraq
And remember, folks, the Pentagon generals -- and maybe even Joint Chiefs -- have his ear. That's not JUST his own analysis, not by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
23. The Republicans have lost militarily in Iraq.
The REPUBLICAN Iraq occupation failure.

The REPUBLICAN economic failure.

Brand it REPUBLICAN Jack = Do not say WE, the United States, or US -- the REPUBLICAN failure...

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-20-06 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. BEFORE BUSH STARTED THIS WAR I REMEMBER POSTING OVER AND OVER..
Edited on Wed Dec-20-06 11:00 PM by flyarm
THAT AN OFFICE FOR RECONSTRUCTION oF IRAQ WAS ONLY OPENED 3 weeks before bush started shock and awe!!

and i knew then this was a doomed mission...i could not understand the dems sitting quiet about it..the only one in congress that questioned it and got publically mad about it was John Kerry!

everyone else in congress was silent about it!

the military spoke out a slight bit..the cia retired spooks were pissed about it but could get no traction from the msm..

but i remember Kerry coming out pissed about it..

this administration never wanted peace..it was not in the plans or agenda!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC