Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA exercise reveals consequences of defeat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 09:45 AM
Original message
CIA exercise reveals consequences of defeat

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20061221-122441-5208r.htm

CIA exercise reveals consequences of defeat

The CIA this month conducted a simulation of how the Iraq war affects the global jihadist movement, and one conclusion was that a U.S. loss would embolden al Qaeda to expand its ranks of terrorists as well as pick new strategic targets, according to sources familiar with the two-day exercise.

CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield confirmed to The Washington Times yesterday that the simulation took place in Northern Virginia. He declined to discuss its findings, saying that a final report is not finished and that the report will not be the intelligence community's official view. It will, however, be circulated within the community and possibly to U.S. policy-makers.

The exercise involved 75 CIA analysts and outside specialists. It was conducted by the CIA's Office of Terrorism Analysis, within the agency's Counterterrorism Center.
A source familiar with the simulation said it was a "red team" exercise in which participants played the role of global jihadists and war-gamed how the U.S. involvement in Iraq will influence their terror movement.

Although it takes no policy positions, the simulation's key finding appears to bolster Mr. Bush's contention that a U.S. loss in Iraq will have far-reaching ramifications.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Merry Christmas and
BOO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinerow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe it's called
"circular logic" or "self-fulfilling prophesy"...:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush Policies drew them into Iraq and now He is using it as an excuse
to stay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pfffffft. Thought experiments conducted by those chosen to give the "correct results"
I wonder how many of the "Red Team" spoke Arabic, or had actually lived in the region... Or more significantly, were Rumsfeld's and Cheney's handpicked men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Ding, ding! "We did this despite having no knowledge of Arabic or the culture."
This is what happens when you let white men work alone in a private room.

I don't really care to hear anything more from The Ministry of Truth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. gee, I wonder what the ramifications of NOT attacking Iraq in the first place would be
THEY NEVER ATTACKED US>

OUR MISTAKE WAS ATTACKING THEM WITHOUT PROVOCATION>

ANYTHING WE DO FROM THAT MOMENT ON WAS DOOMED TO FAIL OR WORSE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdeca2005 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. BS ALERT, BS ALERT,......WHOOP, WHOOP
And please define the term "loss" and for that matter explain what "victory" means as it relates to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maeve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Bushies decide, they don't define eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. loss = anything that emboldens Al Qaeda
emboldens Al Qaeda = loosens bush buddies' control of international oil markets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ah! A Domino Effect!
Where have I heard that before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. First Of All, ". . .told the Washington Times."
That's all the capsule summary i really need.

But, on top of that, they exclude the simplest causative link: If we hadn't gone in the first place, there would have been nothing to "embolden al Qaeda". So, instead of worrying about the consequences of not winning, perhaps this reports should be indictment of the whole idea and how we are contributing to the development and growth of al Qaeda.

But, if that were the story, the Washington Times wouldn't have run in front page.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. well, they better prepare for it because
we've already lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. If it shows up in the Washington Times, instead of a real
newspaper, it is, by definition, automatically suspect; they couldn't get it published anywhere else.

The reason major media is losing the public is not directly attributable to the internet or to rising illiteracy; it's because those outlets cannot tell the truth.

The media types gather and whine about how bad it's getting, yet pretend and claim that they are not the problem and that the reason people are getting poorer and poorer is because of lack of education rather than the real problem of overwhelming greed.

Unless the source is willing to name their sources so we can evaluate them, their word is no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Doesn't this scenario assume we...
continue to be simply confrontational toward terrorism and never address the core reasons for movements like al qaeda existing and doing what they do in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. The only tool they can use is a hammer
Every problem looks like a nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. 75 of them...?
It took 75 CIA Middle East experts to discover that American imperial expansion would be actively opposed by people in the target Middle East countries?

Brilliant insight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Well Playstation 3 is kind of complicated for us old folks.
And it's hard to aim with a joystick and some of them have sore wrists so 75 was about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
14. False choice in their definition of defeat
They calling 'defeat' a 'retreat'.

Removing all or most combat troops may be called a military retreat, but that doesn't mean we have to 'retreat' from all engagement with Iraq. We should reduce and remove combat troops as quickly as possible, but we should help the Iraqi people clean up the mess we made through economic and diplomatic support.

This exercise focuses on only a very narrow view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. The "Domino Effect," 2006 version. Echo of Viet Nam policy decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
18. Um, shouldn't this report be written in the past tense?
... one conclusion was that a U.S. loss would embolden al Qaeda to expand its ranks of terrorists as well as pick new strategic targets...


The jihadists have been gloating over America's humiliation for quite some time now, and recruiting like mad. They know perfectly well that the Republican party -- with Bush as its figurehead and the neocons pulling the strings -- have thrown away our status as "world's only superpower." Flushed it right down the drain. It's the American people, those who've been sleepwalking for so many years, who are just now waking up to this awful fact.

As for picking new strategic targets... done. Past tense. Bali, Madrid, London... Who've I left out?

:grr:

"Mission Accomplished," Republi-con monsters. Half the people in this administration should be tried and sentenced to hang, quite literally. The other half should be thrown in a cell and left to rot.

:grr:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. the disinformation propoganda wing of the CIA in full throttle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. They're always messing up their verb tenses --
it should read: "U.S. loss HAS emboldened al Qaeda."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC