Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing Rep Speaks Out On Laptop Thefts And Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 08:17 PM
Original message
Boeing Rep Speaks Out On Laptop Thefts And Security
Update of this thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=2655002


The aircraft behemoth is dealing with the third stolen company laptop in two years, despite new security policies, employee education and technology.

By Sharon Gaudin
InformationWeek

Dec 21, 2006 01:41 PM

The latest theft of a laptop containing identifying information on 382,000 Boeing employees came as a real blow to the employees who have to worry about identify theft now, and to the company that has been working hard to prevent this from happening.

The computer that was stolen from a Boeing employee in early December was the third laptop theft that the company has had to deal with in the past two years. This latest missing laptop contained the names, Social Security numbers, and in some instances the home addresses of both current and former (mostly retired) employees. The employee who lost it was fired for violating company policy by downloading the information onto the laptop and not encrypting it, says Tim Neale, a spokesman for Boeing.

"Boeing is trying to figure out how to best protect data in this portable world we live in," says Neale. "We've been working this issue hard in the past year Laptops are great tools, but you have employees traveling all over the world with data from their organization, so people are trying to figure out how you improve the security. We're getting there, but I'm sure these 382,000 people would say, 'You're not there yet.' But we are getting there."

Boeing is in a tough position, says Beth Givens, director at the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a non-profit consumer advocacy group based in San Diego.

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=196701493

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-21-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boeing has a department dedicated to coordinating torture flights for the CIA
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061030ta_talk_mayer

THE C.I.A.’S TRAVEL AGENT
Issue of 2006-10-30
Posted 2006-10-23

On the official Web site of Boeing, the world’s largest aerospace company, there is a section devoted to a subsidiary called Jeppesen International Trip Planning, based in San Jose, California. The write-up mentions that the division “offers everything needed for efficient, hassle-free, international flight operations,” spanning the globe “from Aachen to Zhengzhou.” The paragraph concludes, “Jeppesen has done it all.”

Boeing does not mention, either on its Web site or in its annual report, that Jeppesen’s clients include the C.I.A., and that among the international trips that the company plans for the agency are secret “extraordinary rendition” flights for terrorism suspects. Most of the planes used in rendition flights are owned and operated by tiny charter airlines that function as C.I.A. front companies, but it is not widely known that the agency has turned to a division of Boeing, the publicly traded blue-chip behemoth, to handle many of the logistical and navigational details for these trips, including flight plans, clearance to fly over other countries, hotel reservations, and ground-crew arrangements.

The Bush Administration has defended the clandestine rendition program, which began during the Clinton years, as an effective method of transporting terrorists to countries where they can be questioned or held. Human-rights activists and others have said the program’s primary intent is to send suspects to detention centers where they can be interrogated harshly, and have criticized it as an illegal means of “outsourcing torture.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC