Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

James Brown's Widow Says She's Locked Out of Home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 01:40 AM
Original message
James Brown's Widow Says She's Locked Out of Home
BEECH ISLAND, SOUT CAROLINA (AP) -- James Brown's widow says she can't go home. Tomi Rae Brown tells the Augusta Chronicle she was at a retreat when her husband died in an Atlanta hospital Christmas morning.

She says she tried to return to their South Carolina home hours later, but the gate was padlocked. Mrs. Brown says security guards told her they're under orders from her late husband's lawyer and accountant not to let her in.

More:
http://wtol.com/Global/story.asp?S=5857439
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's called mutiny on a small scale. They are her security guards, but they obey the lawyers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's why..
Edited on Tue Dec-26-06 04:24 AM by SoCalDem
if there is even a suspicion that they were "estranged" and if he had financial problems, they are trying to make sure there's an inventory of everything before anything "leaves" the house.

he probably has grown kids who are eager to see that they get their fair share, and not just an explanation of how something they were supposed to get, has been "lost".

The time immediately after a sudden death is the time for inventorying, appraising, and lawyers.. It's sad, but that's the only way for everyone to be sure of what he had and where it is.

I doubt that she's indigent. She'll just have to find a place to stay for a few days until she gets her own lawyer,

on edit:

He apparently has 5 grown children and a 5 yr old. The lock-out is to protect their rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wonder if anyone is locking them out -- to protect her rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The man was in his 70's. They were married less than 5 years
I don't think she has a whole helluva lot of rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Makes no difference how long at all.
As far as survivor rights, unless there is a will stating otherwise, everything always goes to the wife, and nothing to adult children. Tell me about it - my husband's father died. Everything went to his wife (my husband's stepmother). Then she died and everything my father-in-law worked for his entire life went to - his wife's sister (her next of kin)!!!! The natural children of my husband's father got ZERO. The estate wasn't huge, of course, like Brown's, but it was a "nifty" amount. It has always pissed me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Just a point of order here.
They were not married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thank you very much, they were once married but NOT
married.

This has happened so many times.

She may get something but IMO she will not get the same amount that a wife would get, nor should she.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. there usedto be in florida, years ago, something called, "common-law-wife"
meaning when a couple was not married, but lived together as husband and wife and people knew or thought of them as husband and wife, the so called, "wife" was protected by that rule/law. i think it went out the window years ago too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #37
54. It is an interesting concept

and cause for much debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
43. It appears that they are married
They were married when she was married to someone else and had not divorced.
James Brown had the marriage annulled and she got divorced from first husband.
Then they had an official marriage.

Couldn't find anything about them being divorced at his death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
45. If they were divorced at time of his death then she would not be entitled
to anything unless specified in the will. If they got divorced whatever the settlement is all she would be entitled and nothing else just because he died.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Then that was a really smart move
by his lawyers and accountants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Why didn't the natural children sue? They deserved
part of that estate. I would have gotten a lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. The 2 children
were not even informed of the stepmother's death. It was found out much later. The death was in NJ and I'm under the impression (but could be wrong) that the estate goes to the surviving spouse when there are no minor children and the surviving spouse can leave the estate to whoever he or she pleases. It wasn't a large estate, a small home, and unknown amount of cash (but probably not a large amount). I doubt the entire estate was worth more than a hundred thousand or so at the time. It was before the real estate boom. Knowing my hubby, if he had been in charge he would probably have insisted that her family get a third of the estate. Ah well, that is life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. But there were surviving children so it sounds like something
went on that was illegal. Lawyer time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Inheritance laws vary from state to state.
Edited on Tue Dec-26-06 12:38 PM by 1monster
In Florida, a spouse whose name is not on the deed of a homesteaded property will not inherit the property. However, s/he has the right to remain in the home for the rest of her/his life. Then the estate goes to the children of the deceased deed holder.

That means that the surviving spouse cannot sell the homesteaded property without the legal agreement of the ultimate inheritors.

In any case, unless James Brown left instructions to his lawyers that Mrs. Brown was not to be allowed in the house, I believe that she may have the rights of residency.

I find it strange, however, that she would not have been at the hospital with her husband so ill. Perhaps they were separated?

And where is their child?

on edit: clarified gender on spouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. It varies from state to state.
Some states allow for shared inheritance between spouses and children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. How stuff gets divided up also depends on in what state they reside. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpboy_ak Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
53. This is why EVERYONE should have a will!
If I didn't have one, my siblings would split my estate equally, or their heirs, since neither of my parents are alive and I don't have children or a spouse.

Some folks, like yours, won't make wills because they (erroneously) believe that doing so will make them dead sooner, or that the family will divide stuff (as if states didn't have laws very strictly controlling even very small estates), or because they can't deal with the idea of their own death.

If you want to control who inherits from you, MAKE A WILL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I have also heard that they were not legally married
which could add to this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. If they were legally married at his death, she can and should have
substantial rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. that is standard procedure, i think
when my mom died, my dad had already passed away. her few belongings went into storage where family was not allowed to touch it. her estate was left to lawyers, accountants, stock brokers, and a cpa to inventory everything and disutribute it. it has taken almost a year to do the bulk of it, and it was not even a complicated estate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Oh it is very protective to lock out the mother
of the five year old, and let's not forget that Brown physically abused her in 2004 which he paid a fine for. A great man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. I'm not saying he was a great man.. just that when someone dies
there are laws of inheritance that kick in.

Like I said..she's not indigent, and will not be sleeping at a shelter.
All she needs is a lawyer of her own..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. Most definitely. One thing you can say about James Brown -
he wasn't the greatest guy when it came to women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. In Arizona the spouse has all the "rights." Community-property state.
If there is a living spouse, that spouse is entitled to everything over the children - even children of a previous marriage. Children do not have rights above a spouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. UNLESS there's a will that specifies what he wanted his other kids to have
For instance..

Let's say he wanted a gold bracelet to go to his eldest son, but somehow it "disappears" before the will is read/probated..

That's why, in a "sudden" death, measures are taken to secure the home to prepare an accurate inventory FIRST..while everything is still presumed to be there..

I had to do it when I was executor of my father's estate (small potatoes) with 4 grown heirs, it was the only way top assure that everything was in order.. EVEN doing that, my one brother has not spoken to me since (noy MY loss) because he wanted to just "hook up a U-haul" to my Dad's car and take it all away with him..

I insisted on a lawyer and we did it all legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. But, you are not a spouse.
I understand what you are saying about a will, but, (and I don't know all the details in the James Brown case, so I'm speaking generally), were my husband to die tomorrow, (God forbid), nobody could lock me out of our home to inventory it. That's ludicrous. If his grown kids thought they were going to pop up and lock me out of my house... Let me just say it would NEVER happen. Of course, this was my house. I bought it and I added my husband to the deed after we were married. Now it's our house. So, let's just flip the situation around... If I died tomorrow and my kids thought they were going to lock my husband out so they could go through all of our things... NOT. It would NEVER happen.

It sounds like in your situation your father was not married when he passed. Am I right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. My parents were divorced.and there was a very detailed will
Florida was a probate state, and all of the four children were grown and each lived in a different state, so there was no way i was going to rush things through and have long distance legal battles .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #33
51. But a marriage licence is just a piece of paper
it doesn't matter if two people really love each other, or does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. Maybe the will specifies others besides the current wife
And the order is to protect the inheritance to those listed in the will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Brown's Partner Denied Access to Home (not married...
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-James-Brown-Widow.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

December 26, 2006
Brown's Partner Denied Access to Home
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 10:24 a.m. ET

ATLANTA (AP) -- James Brown's lawyer said Tuesday that the late singer and his partner were not legally married and that she was locked out of his South Carolina home for estate legal reasons.

''It's not a reflection on her as an individual,'' lawyer Buddy Dallas told The Associated Press. ''I have not even been in the house, nor will I until appropriate protocol is followed.''

Brown's partner, backup dancer Tomi Rae Hynie, was already married to a Texas man in 2001 when she married Brown, thus making her marriage to Brown null, Dallas said. He said Hynie later annulled the previous marriage, but she and Brown never remarried.

..little more at link....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. lawyer BUDDY DALLAS?
that's the kind of name that inspires confidence in a lawyer.

also, her name is TOMI, and Elizabeth Berkeley's character in showgirls, a backup dancer, was NOMI.

classy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. This already seems to be a dignified process
a la Anna Nicole...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Pic

He was accused of violence against her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. And how many others?
He liked to beat up women...I think it made him 'feel good.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. Actually he pleaded guilty.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/jbrownass1.html

/14 UPDATE--James Brown has pleaded no contest to a domestic violence charge, but will serve no jail time. Instead, the 71-year-old singer will forfeit a $1087 bond as punishment for the January incident at the South Carolina home he shared with wife Tomi Rea Brown (Brown was charged with pushing her to the ground during an argument). According to cops, Brown's wife suffered "scratches and bruises to her right arm and hip" during the bedroom beef. While Brown's plea wipes the case from the Aiken County court docket, his classic bathrobe mug shot is, thankfully, going nowhere.

JANUARY 28--James Brown was arrested today on a domestic violence charge after allegedly pushing his wife to the floor during an argument at the couple's South Carolina home. The 70-year-old singer was nabbed by deputies with the Aiken County Sheriff's Office who responded to a 911 call apparently placed by 33-year-old Tomi Rea Brown. The woman suffered "scratches and bruises to her right arm and hip" during the bedroom dispute, according to investigators. Brown, who has a well-known history of arrests and bizarre behavior, was booked into the local lockup, where the below mug shots were taken. Last July, Brown took out an ad in "Variety" to announce that he and his wife had made a "mutual show business decision" to "go their separate ways." It is unclear whether that anticipated separation and/or divorce has occurred. (1 page)


He also attempted to run over an earlier wife with his car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. If they weren't married, then she isn't the widow, and has no legal rights.
She may be the mother of a minor child, but it sounds like someone with common sense stepped in to the protect the family of the deceased. If she's listed in the will, then its a whole new ball game, but in the meantime, she isn't getting a lot of sympathy from me. Did she actually expect to be treated any differently when he died?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Not quite the same but think about gay couples
In most states they are not legally married. But wouldn't it be cruel to lock out a life partner from a home for the lack of a piece of paper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. It happens *ALL* the time to gay couples right now.
I am aware of one particular instance where two gay men who had been living together for forty years had everything in the "main breadwinner's" name, with a legally binding will stating that everything went to the "surviving" partner in the event of death. Upon the death of the main breadwinner, distant cousins of the man swooped in with a lawyer, got the will broken, took possession of the home (and everything in it), and then sued for BACK RENT!!!

The last I heard about the situation, the "distant cousins" were winning the lawsuit war; the property was worth quite a bit of money, but they had managed to freeze all of the MUTUAL assets (checking accounts, etc.) by claiming they were part of the dead man's estate.

There should be a special place in hell for people like that.

My point, unsympathetic or not, however, is that for straight people to find themselves in this type of situation when there is a remedy available -- marriage -- is ridiculous, and completely expected. His heirs should be protected; she isn't legally one of them (unless he put her in his will that way).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I know of a gay couple, both adults, 4 or 5 years' difference in age,
where the older one legally adopted the younger, to ensure inheritance rights. Bizarre though it seemed, it worked. The property went to his partner with no questions asked. Sad it has to come to that kind of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #27
46. I think that is what the Ancient Romans did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Aren't people who live together as married "common law" spouses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. In Canada, yes, and it comes with certain legal rights.
In most states here in the United States, NO. Michigan, for example, does not recognize common law marriages, nor does California (as far as I am aware).

So, for example, you can "live together" with someone for twenty years, and then end up homeless if your "boyfriend" (or girlfriend) dies and his name is on the deed, with all of "your" possessions going to his children, or his extended family, or whatever. They can also prevent you from attending or participating in funeral arrangements, or visiting at a hospital. I have also heard of cases where legal airtight wills were broken; it all depends on who has the "best" lawyers.

Marriage is a LEGAL relationship; "shacking up" is basically roommates (which is one of the reasons the gay community wants the LEGAL rights of marriage, even if they don't give a crap about the name).

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Depends on the state, and on the lenght of time they were together
Some states have common law marriage after 7 or 10 years. Others have no such provision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Common law can be tricky. Besides cohabitation, a couple has to present
themselves as married, and there needs to be intent, which may be hard to find since they didn't bother "remarrying" after her annulment. There are probably slight differences from state to state in what constitutes a common law marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. If I were the mother of the five year old and living there
you bet I'd expect to be treated differently. But this is what women let themselves in for when they play house, unfortunatley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Moderators, is it possible for this thread to be moved elsewhere?
Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. WHY ???
pray tell!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. Link to States that Recognize CLM
Fact Sheet On Common Law MarriageIF YOU LIVE IN A STATE THAT DOES RECOGNIZE COMMON LAW MARRIAGE: If you live in one of the above states and you "hold yourself out to be married" (by telling ...
www.unmarried.org/common.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

Seems like in Georgia, they would have to be living together since 1967 ~right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. 1997 in Georgia ... but their house is in North Carolina & CLM applies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. South Carolina.
We have no common law marriage provisions in NC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. I have a mental block on "south" when it comes to this story --
I knew it was south when I typed north -- and when I posted the original story, I didn't spell south right in the dateline. It's a jinx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-26-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. What the Hell?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-27-06 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
49. It never fails.
The man isn't in the ground yet and they are fighting over what is due to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
56. I have heard variously that she was the wife and not the wife.
If she isn't the wife, I have no problem with the lock out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
57. She lives in her own home just a block or so away AND
she was still married to someone else when she married JB so that marriage (to JB) was nulled. They never remarried. No wonder she was padlocked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-28-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
58. Curioius that one can be locked out of one's home so easily.
Wouldn't many landlords love to be able to lock out non-paying tenants on a moments notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC