Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Bush Considers Economic Package for Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 02:13 AM
Original message
WP: Bush Considers Economic Package for Iraq
Bush Considers Economic Package for Iraq
Officials Describe the Initiatives as Part of a Series of Steps Designed to Counter Insurgency
By Michael Abramowitz and Robin Wright
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, December 29, 2006; Page A03


President Bush, second from right, walks towards waiting reporters with members of his national security team, from left, Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Peter Pace Thursday, Dec. 28, 2006 in Crawford, Texas. Bush met with his national security team at his Texas ranch, and declared he has moved one step closer to devising a new Iraq strategy but will seek more advice before settling on a final plan. "We're making good progress," Bush said (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

....Some U.S. officials think an economic package may be the most promising element of a revised strategy, since it would deal with the Iraqis' deteriorating conditions and growing disillusionment with the U.S. intervention. Others, however, have severe questions about whether such a package would work almost four years after the American invasion and after previous botched efforts to stimulate economic activity.

The economic package now on the table focuses on three elements, and is separate from the long-term jobs-creation program being promoted by the U.S. military. One senior official cautioned that all three elements have been discussed in some manner but that the final package has not been determined.

One element, traditionally linked to a counterinsurgency strategy, is to follow up any military sweep with a short-term work program that would immediately hire people in the neighborhood to clear up trash or do other small civil-affairs jobs.

This project would begin within hours rather than days of a military operation and would help signal a return to normalcy. It might also help wean young unemployed Iraqi men from the militias or prevent them from joining any of the armed factions that are fueling Iraq's escalating sectarian strife.

The second part would be a micro-loan program -- involving modest loans to help individuals get businesses going -- to generate new economic activity in poor neighborhoods. Unemployment is worse today than during the rule of Saddam Hussein, Iraq's ousted leader.

The third part of the package, which has been developed in part by the Treasury Department, would review dormant state-owned industries to try and determine which ones are economically viable and worth reopening. The package would be a shift from the large-scale and long-term development projects that, in the past, relied heavily on Western contractors and expertise....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/28/AR2006122800094.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Typical * small brain, throw LOTS of money
at the natives and they will cease to be restless.

Hey Bush, how's bout considering an economic package for your OWN COUNTRY, you half wit?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. So how much is W going to tell us to shove it
when we ask for our taxpayer $ returned for our own infrastructure needs telling us we are only socialist pigs looking for a federal teat?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. "President Bush, second from right"
I find it rather hilarious that they thought they needed to identify him like that. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Looks like a good way to borrow more money to give to cronies
It's not like we're staying the course or anything. We're going to finish the job, that's the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. thus far, the 'details' of this plan show a distinct lack of perspective
on the situation, IMO.

So, let me get this straight: We're going to go into a neighborhood or city, rip it to shreds with artillery, etc, and then -- like a football game -- someone will blow a whistle and start handing out cash to the locals who will gleefully emerge from their fox holes and start sweeping up the 'mess', which will no doubt include some human remains.

To continue, we would then loan them money so they can start a business, a business that would be shot full of holes when the next 'sweep' came around.

Gee, I know it's not fashionable to inject reality into the dialog these days, but since human lives and billions of dollars and our international standing hangs in the balance, shouldn't we have a plan that will, you know, work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Perhaps if they allowed tariffs, Unions and border control again, it might help
Iraqis crawl out from under the neocon constitution they forced on the country. They have privatized just about everything that was run by the government and some of those functions were never taken over by corporations because there was very little money in them. Now that even corporations wont touch those functions, they are going to make them government run again. Seems they are just going around in circles. They turned Iraq's economy into a neocon's wet dream and found it doesn't work. Surprise, surprise, surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. I see that OIL isn't anywhere in that package. .
Oh, wait, I see it under the table. . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC