Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US cedes control of South Korea army

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 03:57 AM
Original message
US cedes control of South Korea army
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6391799.stm

The US and South Korea have reached a deal to hand full control of South Korea's military back to Seoul by 2012.

The agreement ends a 50-year pact that gave the US wartime command of South Korea's army, dating to the Korean War.

Under pressure in Iraq, the US had wanted to hand over in 2009. But South Korea pushed for a slower transition.

The US currently has 29,500 troops on the Korean peninsula and Seoul's military numbers 680,000. North Korea has more than one million troops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's the story from AFP too: South Korea welcomes US military handover agreement
(See all you other countries of the world, that's all it takes. If you too become an Economic Superpower, we might consider removing our occupying Army from your country too.)

South Korea welcomes US military handover agreement


24/02/2007 09h24

SEOUL (AFP) - South Korea on Saturday welcomed an agreement struck with Washington to hand Seoul wartime operational control over its own forces for the first time in more than 50 years.

Defence (sic) heads of the two countries agreed to return wartime control to South Korea in 2012, ending command arrangements that date back to the Korean War.

"The agreement will serve as a key launching pad for a take-off in the South Korea-US alliance, praised as the most successful bond in the past 50 years," the presidential Blue House said in a statement.

The United States, stretched by engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan, had hoped to effect the command transition as early as 2009, but ultimately agreed to South Korea's insistence that responsibilities be shifted at a slower pace.

After the transition on April 17, 2012, the South Korean military will have full operational control during times of peace and war. US forces in Korea will move to a supporting role.

(more at link) <http://www.afp.com/english/news/stories/070224092110.pps536ia.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's the hurry? We haven't even had troops there 5 decades yet.
One reason South Korea wants us to keep our soldiers there is that we pump money into their economy. One reason I want our troops out of there is that it pumps money out of our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. maybe if SK returned the favor (50 yrs)--they could send at least 100,000
of their troops to Iraq??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-24-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pushed back from 2009 to 2012 ? then pushed back again. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. PLease
we will never give them their country back. They would probably unify with the North if we left and DC would NEVER allow that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorldResident Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. What basis do you have for that claim?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-26-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. A majority on both sides
want reunification. The south would probably take on massive debt to see their families again..just as Germany did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC