Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Colorado Governor) Ritter says "no" to Army move (Eminent Domain)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:06 PM
Original message
(Colorado Governor) Ritter says "no" to Army move (Eminent Domain)
Source: Denver Post

Even though he's not sure the state has the power to say "no" to the federal government, Gov. Bill Ritter today signed a bill aimed at stopping the Army from using eminent domain to expand a training site in southeastern Colorado.

Ranchers have mobilized to fight the Army's proposal to expand the Piñon Canyon maneuver site by 418,000 acres - or 653 square miles. That's nearly triple the land the Army now owns, and the expansion would swallow up dozens of ranches.

The Army still is studying how the expansion would be accomplished, but officials have said they can't rule out the use of eminent domain if the plans move ahead.

Eminent domain is the power to force a landowner to sell to make way for a project for the public good.

As ranchers, students and lawmakers looked on, Ritter said he didn't want the new law to raise expectations that the state could definitely stop the Army from forcing ranchers to sell. But he said it is a tool the state could use to help protect ranchers whose families have been living in the area since the turn of the last century.



Read more: http://www.denverpost.com/ci_5810613
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am slightly encouraged, but why didn't he JUST SAY NO?
Argh, this issue is pissing off a lot of people, why the hell can they just grab the land for their latest rumored, alleged detention center?

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They'll get their land.
As soon as somebody steps up that has land to sell at a major mark-up.

If they can't have the land by paying somebody off, they'll take it from somebody without the financial ability to challenge it.


As I understand it, Denver International Airport ended up where it is because the land it is on was conveniently owner by members of the city council at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Have it in Wyoming or Utah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC