Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court Stands By Exxon Valdez Damages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:22 AM
Original message
Court Stands By Exxon Valdez Damages
Source: Reuters

A U.S. appeals court declined on Wednesday to reconsider its decision to make Exxon Mobil Corp. pay $2.5 billion in punitive damages for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. The punitive damages ruling against Exxon -- originally $5 billion in 1994 -- has been the subject of a long legal battle between the oil company and 32,000 fishermen, Alaska natives and property owners who were awarded the damages.

In December, the court had already cut $2 billion off a $4.5 billion verdict against the company, saying the earlier penalty was too harsh when compared with the economic harm caused by the spill. The split three-judge panel court had also said the energy company's prompt action to clean up the oil and compensate fishermen and others for economic losses lowered the reprehensibility of Exxon's conduct. But the company had asked the court to rehear the case in hopes to further reduce the penalty. It has argued that punitive damages should not be more than $25 million.

"The plaintiffs here suffered no physical injuries - their only claim was that the oil spill harmed their commercial fishing interests," wrote Judge Kozinski, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan. "After the accident, Exxon acted as a model corporation - it spent over $2 billion to remove oil from the water and adjacent shore and $900 million to restore damaged natural resources."

The Romanian born-judge, famous for his caustic remarks, also added: "If your vessels sail into the vast waters of the Ninth Circuit, a jury can shipwreck your operations through punitive damages."

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/us_nm/exxonmobil_exxonvaldez_dc



I can't believe these pricks still haven't payed the punitive damages, 18 years after the oil spill. And they're going to delay even longer by appealing to the US Supreme Court. And how about that c**ksucker judge in the article? Sounds like a Reagan appointee - "Screw the fisherman...it was only 10 million barrels of oil"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FluxRostrum Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. the USS Punitive's run a ground
"If your vessels sail into the vast waters of the Ninth Circuit, a jury can shipwreck your operations through punitive damages."

I thought that's why they called it the JUSTICE system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. A delay of justice is injustice its self
This is one basic thing that's wrong with our justice system. If you have enough money you can delay forever. Just look at Kenny Boy Lay. They dragged that out so long he died before he could be sentenced. And now with his conviction null and void his heirs get to keep all that money he stole.

Just drag it on for a few more decades and all the plaintiffs will be dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
micraphone Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exxon Mobil... broke?
"...a jury can shipwreck your operations through punitive damages"

I don't think so. Not ANY time soon, bubba.

Get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ooh, $2 billion in punitive damages
What would that be, about 2½ weeks' of Exxon's profits from last year? Oh, the pain! The pain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-24-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No kidding
They made $40 billion in profits last year, but they can't pay $2.5 billion in damages from 18 years ago. They didn't have a problem giving Lee Raymond a $600 million retirement package, but they do have a problem paying what's owed to the commercial fishermen and others damaged by the oil spill. But just ask the Reagan-appointed judge: Exxon behaved as a "model coporation" after the oil spill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC