Source:
Reuters A U.S. appeals court declined on Wednesday to reconsider its decision to make Exxon Mobil Corp. pay $2.5 billion in punitive damages for the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. The punitive damages ruling against Exxon -- originally $5 billion in 1994 -- has been the subject of a long legal battle between the oil company and 32,000 fishermen, Alaska natives and property owners who were awarded the damages.
In December, the court had already cut $2 billion off a $4.5 billion verdict against the company, saying the earlier penalty was too harsh when compared with the economic harm caused by the spill. The split three-judge panel court had also said the energy company's prompt action to clean up the oil and compensate fishermen and others for economic losses lowered the reprehensibility of Exxon's conduct. But the company had asked the court to rehear the case in hopes to further reduce the penalty. It has argued that punitive damages should not be more than $25 million.
"The plaintiffs here suffered no physical injuries - their only claim was that the oil spill harmed their commercial fishing interests," wrote Judge Kozinski, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan. "After the accident, Exxon acted as a model corporation - it spent over $2 billion to remove oil from the water and adjacent shore and $900 million to restore damaged natural resources."
The Romanian born-judge, famous for his caustic remarks, also added: "If your vessels sail into the vast waters of the Ninth Circuit, a jury can shipwreck your operations through punitive damages."
Read more:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070523/us_nm/exxonmobil_exxonvaldez_dc
I can't believe these pricks still haven't payed the punitive damages, 18 years after the oil spill. And they're going to delay even longer by appealing to the US Supreme Court. And how about that c**ksucker judge in the article? Sounds like a Reagan appointee - "Screw the fisherman...it was only 10 million barrels of oil"