Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Sandy) Berger Is Disbarred After Archives Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:05 AM
Original message
(Sandy) Berger Is Disbarred After Archives Case
Source: WP

Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, a national security adviser to President Bill Clinton, was voluntarily disbarred from the practice of law yesterday by the D.C. Court of Appeals.

Berger agreed last month to relinquish his law license to the D.C. Board on Professional Responsibility, a part of the D.C. Bar, rather than submit to an investigation by the bar's counsel of his removal of classified documents from the National Archives. A three-member panel of the D.C. appellate court accepted his offer.

Berger pleaded guilty in April 2005 to taking classified material without authorization, a misdemeanor. As part of the plea agreement, Berger admitted he lied to Archives staff about taking copies of national security documents out of the building. He was fined $50,000 and barred from access to classified material for three years.

The Board on Professional Responsibility oversees ethical and professional standards for District lawyers, and the Office of Bar Counsel investigates allegations of unethical or unprofessional conduct. Bar counsel investigations are typically secret but are frequently triggered by media accounts of wrongdoing or, as in Berger's case, by criminal convictions.


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/07/AR2007060702278.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here we go; stand by for gloating. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Gloating from whom?
The RW 'media' was full of this story weeks ago, and they were pissed.

Berger pleaded guilty; as soon as he pleaded, the investigation stopped. RW thought is that had the investigation continued, more would have surfaced--for example, why he took multiple copies of a single document, when the archives don't keep multiple copies of identical materials.

The RW hope was that the bar investigation would have continued. Upon conclusion, the results are made public. However, if the guy stops the investigation, say, by resigning, then the only public news is that there was an charge brought--even the charge itself is confidential.

The RWers are very much displeased by this; I haven't noticed any gloating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. and this will be used for the nexr 20 years by the RW media
to show how corrupt the Clinton people were - they committed a misdemeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Well I wasn't driving to get lunch anyway
Edited on Fri Jun-08-07 11:36 AM by underpants
and that is good because I am sure that Rush will be talking about this for the whole show.

I wonder how many news shows this will pop up in the first 5 minutes. Jefferson pleads innocent, Berger disbarred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. How Is It That Your Car Stereo Got Stuck on Limpballs Anyway? I'd Get it Serviced If I Were You
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. He's funnier than Franken ever was
he (and they) just don't know it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coffeenap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. So, he faces the courts and accepts his punishment. Anyone
imagine the corrupt criminals in our government now doing the same? Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Are they still looking
for whoever it was who dissappeared parts of Bush's Service Records?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. and whatever happened to Katrina Leung?
For those not familiar with this case:


Poor Katrina Leung. If only she had given her FBI-earned money to Democrats, her bright smile would be appearing on newspaper front pages day after day, and Republicans would make sure every one in the country knew how to pronounce her name.

She wouldn’t be known as, simply, a “political fundraiser”; she’d have the more dignified title of “major Democratic Party donor and spy.” Republican attack dogs in Congress would already be conducting full-scale investigations. A special prosecutor would be called for. She would be vilified by Rush Limbaugh as a spy for the Democratic Party, which he would accuse of siding with the enemy. Bill O'Reilly would denounce her and the Democrats. Regnery Press would already have two books out railing about how she and the Democrats have committed treason against America. Ann Coulter would be calling for the chairman of the DNC to be put before a firing squad.

But Katrina Leung is unlucky in the celebrity category. She allegedly was a spy who loved the Republican Party too much. In news stories, Leung has been labeled as a "prominent Republican fundraiser" and "Republican activist." So the Republican scandal attack machine is silent, because she is one of them, after all.

The accused Chinese double agent and her husband decided to give thousands -- $27,000 in fact (by one account), since 1992 -- to the GOP.


See http://www.buzzflash.com/analysis/03/05/19_spy.html and other sources.

For all of Sandy berger's misdemeanors, he never passed classified documents to a foreign government.

When a prominent GOP fundraiser DOES commit espionage, the punishment is.... nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And the RW spin machine keeps insisting...
he "stole classified documents and destroyed them." From all that I have seen, it was COPIES of classified documents. I have read statements from national archives people that say "no documents are missing." Am I wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You are mostly right
I think (from memory)that he did destroy one actuall original document but it was the 3 in a line of 5 or so drafts so the ones after it had any of the added information included in them. All the others were copies of originals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specimenfred1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Post a link or that's just a smear
100% serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12.  .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Key phrase-"no original docs destroyed"
Moonie times article never mentions that. They only use the phrase "removed classified documents." WSJ initially blasted the conspiracy theory, but changed their minds later. Maybe they got a phone call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Berger pleaded guilty in April 2005..." "...agreed last month to relinquish his law license"
Unlike so many Republican, he admitted to his wrongdoing and has accepted his punishment for it.

Look at Republicans like John Doolittle, Tom Delay, and others. They'll never admit guilt and instead blame Democrats for everything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomskyite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did we ever get a reason why he did this?
It just seems like such a ridiculous thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. He Was Preparing To Testify Before The 9-11 Whitewash Committee
And apparently he decided to take shortcuts. If he'd only lie like so many Bush officials to the committee, he would have been in the clear :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. It just goes to show:
Sandy should have attended Regents U.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why doesn't cheney get disbarred?
Or sent to the Hague?

Why did Sandy Berger take these "classified documents", anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Cheney's not a lawyer
B.A. and M.A. in Political Science only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yeah, I realized that after I
wrote it but I'm thinking .."Hague, then". He sure as hell needs the punishment to fit the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Even so, disbarment would mean nothing to Cheney
Other than a mild embarrassment, it certainly wouldn't put a dent in his earning potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Right...cheney gang needs
to be indicted as war criminals and for crimes against humanity. The US corporatemediawhores need to be rounded up as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. The radio Pundits need a name with a 'D' behind it
to bloviate, William Jefferson, DEMOCRAT, Louisiana, 'scandal'....see the democrats get caught doing naughty things, too. it's naught just the Republicans taking bribes and planning the downfall of western civilization as we know it, by hosing the Constitution....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
25. Oh, Whoop Dee Dup
They have gotten 'em two Democrats to kick around on the radio now, so Limbah, can alternate tirades of righteous indignation on William Jefferson, DEMOCRAT,Louisiana and Sandy 'Burglar' DEMOCRAT of the Bill Clinton Supporting Kind. These two men are about to become human footballs of radio, television, the internet, and all the news everywhere for the next 3 days. We will forget Gonzo, Scooter, Abramhoff, Foley, Cunningham, DeLay, and the big fish at the head of the 'Family'. This is a gang of 'Made Men'. This is the "Mob" GOP, style. Fascism at it's finest. But now they scratched up two unfortunate bunglers for damage control. The 'they do it to' defense. My foot. What is the score? Two to twenty??? You won't think so by the time we hear DEMOCRAT a thousand times everytime we turn a noise box.... blah, blah, blah,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. What specific documents from the Clinton administration did he take?
They are supposed to be copies, according to the article, but what documents was he actually looking for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC