Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GM, Ford, Chrysler Discuss Joint Health-Care Fund, People Say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 11:41 PM
Original message
GM, Ford, Chrysler Discuss Joint Health-Care Fund, People Say
Source: Bloomberg

By Jeff Green and Jeff Bennett

June 9 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler may create an independent health-insurance fund to trim their combined $114 billion in future retiree health-care obligations, five people with direct knowledge of the talks said.

The U.S. automakers would each contribute to the fund to pay for health-care benefits of United Auto Workers retirees, said the people, who didn't want to be identified because the discussions are private. The talks are preliminary so the fund's size and how much each company would contribute haven't been determined, they said.

...

Even with the recent concessions by the UAW, retiree benefits remain the U.S. carmakers' biggest cost disadvantage compared with Toyota in the U.S. The difference is as much as $22 an hour, according to the Harbour-Felax Group of Royal Oak, Michigan.

GM had about 357,000 union retirees in the U.S. at the end of last year. Toyota, which doesn't disclose U.S. health-care spending, has 269 U.S. retirees. Ford reported 570,000 active union and non-union employees, retirees and dependents.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aGI_mzsR3Lz8&refer=home



There is a better solution to fix this mess: Universal healthcare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. "There is a better solution to fix this mess: Universal healthcare"
Exactly. It's the only thing which will allow us to compete w/other countries, and it's the only pro-life thing to do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's amusing to see them moving in that direction.
As you say, it just begs the question: why not go all the way, and do universal health care?

You can practically see the smoke coming out their ears. "We can't have socialized medicine! What we need is... a system where we all pool our resources to provide better health care for everybody! Yeah! That's the ticket! Not like those cheese eating Europeans, who pool their resources..."

Oh, never mind.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. When will free-market ideologues realize that employer supported health care destroys them?
Ug. Private capitalism good. Ug. Government bad.

Well, here we are crushing all employers by forcing them to carry huge burdens to cover their workers. Foreign companies get to skate completely. La-dee-da. Here, however, there's a huge burden on anything created because employers have to support their benefit packages.

Single payer. Let's just call it SOCIALIZED MEDICINE and be done with it. Why should we shackle the glorious movers and shakers of our selfish individualistic system? It drags everyone and everything down, but it's done at the altar of market beauty.

It'll only get worse, but the ideologues won't bend regardless of any overwhelming information.

This is mean, stupid and irrational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. When will free-market ideologues realize that employer supported health care destroys them?
Ug. Private capitalism good. Ug. Government bad.

Well, here we are crushing all employers by forcing them to carry huge burdens to cover their workers. Foreign companies get to skate completely. La-dee-da. Here, however, there's a huge burden on anything created because employers have to support their benefit packages.

Single payer. Let's just call it SOCIALIZED MEDICINE and be done with it. Why should we shackle the glorious movers and shakers of our selfish individualistic system? It drags everyone and everything down, but it's done at the altar of market beauty.

It'll only get worse, but the ideologues won't bend regardless of any overwhelming information.

This is mean, stupid and irrational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC