Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Duke lacrosse prosecutor faces own trial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 04:37 PM
Original message
Duke lacrosse prosecutor faces own trial
Source: Associated Press

RALEIGH, N.C. - More than a year after shocking allegations emerged about Duke University's lacrosse team, prosecutor Mike Nifong was back in court Tuesday — this time as the defendant.

The North Carolina State Bar charged the Durham County district attorney with several violations of the state's rules of professional conduct, all tied to his handling of the lacrosse case.

If convicted by a disciplinary commission hearing the case, he could be stripped of his license to practice law in the state.

Nifong won indictments against three lacrosse players last year after a woman hired as a stripper for a team party in March 2006 said she was raped. One of three had graduated, but Duke suspended the other two. Criticism of Nifong's evidence and handling of the case increased through the summer. Then, when the bar filed its initial ethics charges, Nifong turned the case over to the state attorney general, who dropped all the charges.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070612/ap_on_re_us/duke_lacrosse;_ylt=AnLs7Bg_8xh8WE7y7cAEU3Cs0NUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. And next, Crystal Gail Mangum.
For obstruction of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dang uppity prosecutors
they should make an example outta him. :sarcasm:

Actually, I think this is going overboard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah.
It's not like he ruined innocent lives or anything.

Don't give me any tripe about how they behaved at the party. Their behavior does not earn them a wrongful accusation and a lying, vindictive prosecutor.

May his jury nail him to the wall, and may his career be permenantly over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. When a presumed victim
Edited on Tue Jun-12-07 05:40 PM by Jim4Wes
lies as in this case there is going to be damage most of the time no matter who the prosecutor is. The prosecutor in this case didn't strike me as vindictive just that this case was a bit too much for him. Taking away his law license seems extreme to me.

on edit substitute presumed victim for witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't think you actually know much about the case, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Probably not enough
But it does seem like people are assuming they know the prosecutors motive for pursuing the case when that is clearly speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Your post was #2 on the thread, and no one has claimed anything
Edited on Tue Jun-12-07 06:40 PM by lizzy
about Nifong's motive, before you chipped in, and claimed it was going overboard. Do you feel such sympathy for all the prosecutors that are put on trial, or is there something special about Nifong specifically?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I wasnt commenting on DU'ers at
Edited on Tue Jun-12-07 06:54 PM by Jim4Wes
that point just the trial. I'll bow out of this thread at this point, I already stated that perhaps I don't know as much as others, if you feel like making any more comments on my posts ** in this thread I mean ** they will most likely not be read by me as I am not going to further agitate in this thread.

edited to clarify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. He is an uppity prosecutor, and he needs to be put in his place
Indeed,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I don't think that this is going overboard at all.
I don't care WHY he did what he did, but he's an example of how the justice system in this country can rampantly destroy people's lives. In this particular case, I'm not sure that those accused have had their lives ruined, but there is no question that innocent people have been railroaded in NC (and elsewhere) - some of those innocent people have spent decades in jail or even been executed on trumped-up charges.

There's no excuse and we have to insist that the justice system behave honestly, or we might as well be living under the Nazis. It's not a long step from what Nifong did to what the feds are doing to people in Gitmo. Not a long step at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. neither do I
the State decided not to pursue charges against the alleged victim. However, they absolutely have to go after Nifong after his egregious misuse of tremendous power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. I wonder if the lacrosse players would be in jail right now if they had been poor.
I remember seeing people being released from prison after having served many years, when DNA testing proved they were innocent of crimes of which they had been convicted. Those cases left a lasting impression on me.

How many have been wrongfully prosecuted just because some Barney Fife felt like he had to arrest someone? The older I get the less respect I have for our criminal 'justice' system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. I posed a similar question before, but I find a flaw with it, at least in this case.
In this case it seems that if the accused were not "rich white boys"(or at least appeared to be), then it wouldn't have been a story at all. In turn, the jackass Nifong wouldn't have seen it as an opportunity to boost his own career.

However, in other cases, I think you're right... I mean just look at the recent cases in which some minor teenager gets arrested for getting a BJ from someone two years younger than him......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I caught total hell for calling this case bogus, when it broke.
Let's all remember the personal attacks, and try not to knee-jerk the next time someone offers a differing opinion.

Most people who manipulate evidence and procedure are motivated by either $$ or political power, or both. For this guy, it looks like a pure power grab, for his own re-election.

I hope his career is over, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Lock him up for 6 months.
Let him get a taste of what he almost did to those guys. Motherfu*kers like that make me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneinok Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where are the marches?
Ah, when this crap started the media was filled with hundreds of women marching to send these Duke players to jail. Where are those marchers today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. On to some new witch hunt I imagine
They didn't get to burn anyone at the stake on this one, so they'll be gnashing their teeth to find a new target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Plenty are probably still marching, I'd bet. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. There's the still odd poster or two who insists the "rich white boys" got away with it
despite all supporting evidence to the contrary.

I'm actually surprised the holdouts haven't shown up on this post yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yes there are.
They are still angry that Nifong and Crystal Gail Mangum deprived them of a nice Lifetime Channel story: the rich white boys victimizing the innocent, salt of the earth poor black girl.

They are still very bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Or they're just plain mad that she never had a lawyer and it never went to trail.
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 03:57 PM by superconnected
After all that's what that was all about - stopping a woman accusing white guys of rape from getting to trial. It only took 50 lawyers and a year to stop her for that "slamdunk" case.

And of course going after anyone who would allow such a thing go to trial.

It would be better had it gone to trail and then a judge and jury deem the accuser unbelieveable there, than simply refusing it to be heard. Electing a new prosecutor to represent the accuser and him deciding he's going to not represent her just puts it at 50:50 wether a prosecuter would take it.

And of course makes everyone that believes a women doesn't have a right to accuse someone of rape because hey she may be lying, get a warmfuzzy feeling that somehow nonguilt has been proved because it wasn't heard by a jury. Fortunatley for most men being accused of rape whether they did it or not, it will get heard by a jury. They have a chance to clear their name then, which these guys still haven't had. People here wrongly think they have, but no judge or jury ruled anything. Only a prosecutor assigned because she didn't have a lawyer said he wouldn't take it to court.

Now back to attacking nifong for - omg, defending the victim. I think the problem myself is that he broke the law and that should be addressed, not that he didn't have a right to defend her in the first place which is the vibe I'm picking up.

Now back to me wondering why it was so important it never go to trial if they had a slamdunk case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Totally ridiculous post. I think you are hopelessly confused.
Nifong's job was not to "defend" the "victim." He is a prosecutor, he represents the state. Prosecutors do not represent accusers. New prosecutor was not "elected to represent the accuser."
AG took over the case because Nifong asked him to, since he was facing bar charges.
AG not only declared there was insufficient evidence to go forward with the case, he found that there was no credible evidence that the crime took place, and he declared accused were innocent.
As for you, I don't think you show even basic comprehension of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. There was never sufficient evidence to go to trial
A certain bar has to be met to send a case to trial, and Nifong didn't meet it. He presented bogus evidence to the grand jury from a dishonest accuser and hid exculpatory evidence, all while making statements to the media that the case was open and shut.

Furthermore, the Attorney General of North Carolina and Nifong himself said in dropping the charges that the men were innocent, not "not guilty" as in there was insufficient evidence to mount a case, but innocent.

In our justice system one does not and should not have to always stand trial to clear his or her name. If a case is demonstrably false and lacking any basis in reality, a good prosecutor has a duty to drop the charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Prosecutors represent the State, not the percieved victim...
You seem to have no clue as to how courts operate, do you? First, there is a standard of evidence to allow a trial to go forward. Judges dismiss trials all the time due to lack of evidence, or evidence that contradicts the prosecutor's case. The fact of the matter is that the players did nothing illegal, were falsely accused, and the prosecutor acted in a criminal manner, withholding evidence, etc. during this entire fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. At least he's being accused of something he DID do
Unlike what he did to the LaCrosse players.

Jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hopefully he'll get locked up too
Scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. Scumbag - needs to be prosecuted to the full extent possible...
Absolutely disgusting the way too many "womyn" here had those INNOCENT boys lynched and tarred and feathered...

Absolutely disgusting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nifong has injured everyone-
Edited on Wed Jun-13-07 11:01 PM by rayofreason
The innocent Duke students, the legal profession, and the real victims of sex crimes who may go without justice as a result of his misdeeds.

The sooner he is given a fair trial based on evidence, the better (except for Nifong).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. no more than any lawyer who broke the law ever did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. He injured Crystal Gail Mangum as well
Edited on Thu Jun-14-07 08:01 PM by marshall
She's definitely not innocent in this mess, but prosecutors across the nation have confused, drug addled, mentally disturbed people make false allegations every day because they are mad or crazy or trying to dodge their own charges. He should have referred her to mental health people, either in jail or in the community, and never went ahead with the charges. Her life is a mess because of this case. The one rainbow she has is that Jesse Jackson is supposed to pay her way through college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-13-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. He should serve hard time for this.
Criminal prosecution for political gain. Nifong is nothing less than a criminal and should be handed a good, long sentence in prison, if found guilty.

However, he'll probably just get off by having his law license revoked and face a certain civil court trial.

But, so should the accuser, I think she should serve a couple years for what she put those men through in their lives. It should send a message that revenge through the police/courts is illegal and will be dealt with firmly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. It's a bar trial. The worse they can do is to disbar him.
They can't put him into prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. And disbarment would be high on the "unendurable suck" list for most lawyers. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. oh gawd.
Do you even know what happened there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-14-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. What she did can land her in prison
Filing a false police report as well as making false claims to the police are felonies in most states in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC