Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nifong To Resign As Durham DA (Duke Case)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:14 PM
Original message
Nifong To Resign As Durham DA (Duke Case)
Source: WGHP

Nifong to Resign as Durham DA

DURHAM, N.C. (AP) -- Duke lacrosse prosecutor Mike Nifong says he will resign as the Durham County district attorney, regardless of the outcome of his ethics trial.

Nifong says many of the allegations against him are justified, but he says he's not a liar. He apologized to the lacrosse players who were charged and later declared innocent, and he says he was trying to do the right thing in the case.

Nifong made the announcement that he would resign as he took the stand in his own defense. The North Carolina State Bar has charged Nifong with violating rules governing professional conduct in his handling of the case.


Read more: http://www.myfoxwghp.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3504545&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. adding another link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalkydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not surprised
and notice how everyone has completely forgot the victim in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tess49 Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What victim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Don't hold your breath with this one.
He took a wrong exit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Don't you mean the victims?
The Duke LaCrosse players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tess49 Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Come on, they are rich, white, privileged kids.
Is it possible for them to be victims? ;) If nothing else, they are guilty of being similar to others who have done bad things in the past. (I am trying to summarize the case for not caring about what happened to the lacrosse players.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If I was a porn star I'd use Duke LaCrosse as a screen name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. !
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
91. Are you serious?
So you dont care about someone because they are born into a successful family? The fact that they were headed for prison, where they would be subject to horrific events doesnt bother you, because they are "white"? One of the most racist posts I have ever read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Indeed we should not forget the three victims: the Lacrosse players
and to a lesser extent, the whole team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fazoolius_2006 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Very true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. Victim? The lying and seriously disturbed Crystal Gail Mangum?
The only victims were the 3 players wrongly accused, the Duke Lacrosse team wrongly smeared, and their families.

2006 Duke University lacrosse case

The 2006 Duke University lacrosse case began in March 2006 when Crystal Gail Mangum, an African-American exotic dancer, falsely claimed that she had been raped by three unidentified white members of the Duke University men's lacrosse team. Mangum had been engaged to work a party held at the residence of two of the team captains, and she reported that the incident took place there.

Subsequently, three of the team's members - David Evans of Bethesda, Maryland, Reade Seligmann of Essex Fells, New Jersey, and Collin Finnerty of Garden City, New York - were charged with first-degree forcible rape, first-degree sexual offense, and kidnapping.<1> Duke's nationally ranked lacrosse team's season was suspended for the rest of the 2006 season.

The initial prosecutor for the case, Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong, withdrew from the case in January 2007, after the North Carolina State bar filed ethics charges against him based on his actions in prosecuting this case.<2> Nifong had originally responded to the charges by saying the defense was engaged in a smear campaign against him.<3> On April 12, 2007, however, he issued a carefully-worded statement, "To the extent that I made judgments that ultimately proved to be incorrect, I apologize to the three students that were wrongly accused." The case has drawn national attention and highlighted racial tensions in the Durham, North Carolina area.<4> On 15 June, 2007, Nifong apologized to the Duke families during his ethics committee hearing, and declared his intent to resign as district attorney.<5>

On April 11, 2007, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper announced that all charges against the three lacrosse players had been dropped and that "based on the significant inconsistencies between the evidence and the various accounts given by the accusing witness, we believe these three individuals are innocent of these charges." Cooper stated that his own investigation "led us to the conclusion that no attack occurred." He said the charges resulted from a "tragic rush to accuse and a failure to verify serious allegations"<6> by a DA. "This case shows the enormous consequences of overreaching by a prosecutor," Cooper added.<6> In the same interview, Cooper offered no explanation of the woman’s motive or mental health. However, he said that no criminal charges will be brought against her because she “may actually believe” the many different stories she told.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Duke_University_lacrosse_team_scandal

Final NC Attorney General Report here:

www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0427071duke1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. You meaning the stripper who lied her ass off?
She lost "victim" status when her case fell apart due to no evidence to support any of her claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. Yes - those poor INNOCENT BOYS whom that skank LIED about...
Don't ever forget those innocent boys whose lives were ruined by that horrible person...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
51. "Innocent boys"?
They're hanging out at the kind of wild parties where they have "exotic dancers" (read: hookers), and they wonder why they got falsely accused of rape?

If they'd been studying, or out on an actual one-on-one date, they wouldn't have gotten in trouble. After all, it's kind of hard to be accused of rape if you're nowhere near the so-called victim....

It's nice to turn this old, tired phrase on guys for once: "They asked for it." :rofl:

Seriously, though, maybe now they'll learn their lesson and stay on the straight and narrow. This time was a close call--next time, they might not be so lucky. Hit the books instead of the parties and bars...what a novel concept!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Yes - INNOCENT - EXONERATED - the NC Bar even stated so...
they were just not "not guilty" - because of the DNA - they were proved "INNOCENT" of the charges.

Take your man-hating and shove it - you need therapy...

The SKANK was a slut - a whore - she had the semen of SEVERAL other men in her at the time - we all know WHAT she was, that is not at issue.

She saw GOLD in these INNOCENT boys - and tried to wrangle a possible out of court settlement of millions from them - but luckily - their wealth went to proving beyond all reasonable doubt what a skank and whore this golddiggin LIAR she was...

But go on - defend this lying piece of shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. Actually one of them left the party early and had cell phone
records, ATM records, and a taxi receipt to prove it. Do you understand what "alibi" means? Didn't stop him from being accused of rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #39
76. You're joking, right?
You can't really be that ignorant to think these were good kids who were victimized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #76
78. They were falsely accused of rape by a mentally disturbed individual
How else would you define victimized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't let the door hit you in the ass, Nifong
He used this case not for justice, but to get himself re-elected by pandering to the black vote in Durham. He's a disgrace, and a liar.

Also, it's alleged that his resignation is a ploy to save his law license. Either way, he deserves to be disbarred. He doesn't need to join a cushy law firm after this travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I watched this morning and I swore he was rehearsing for a DOJ stint...
"I don't recall..."

"In my mind..."

"That's not how I interpreted it..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Our party needs to have a formal excommunication process
A process whereby someone can be removed, BANNED from the Democratic Party, to the point where the state Secretary of State won't let you register with that party.

We need to have a process in place whereby the party can formally kick out members who run afoul of the law or breach the public trust in a substantial way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Bullshit. We need to take separate politics and corruption. Newt Gingrich led us down
that slimy path, we need to find our way back.

Thanks for your concern...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fazoolius_2006 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. Not sure if that is possible.
I thought Pelosi and Reid were going to sort that out and get us started in the right direction, but alas, they are politicians like all the others. The earmarks are out of control still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Right, it's all their fault.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Excommunication, I like that!
Nifong is a stain on the Democratic Party.

Betcha he ends up with a stint on FauxNews. He and Gonzales would fit right in, lies and denials and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. In other words you want a Stalinist Democratic Party?
You'd like qualifications... party loyalty, acceptable opinions, no variance from the received party directives.


That's not my party. That's not the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Is honesty and abiding by the law too much to ask?
I agree that some variation in party loyalty, acceptable opinions, etc. ought to be fostered, but come on, is it really out of order to ask that they follow the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. How about getting rid of the criminals and LIARS and worse among us...
YES - but it would be AMERICAN, not "stalinist"...

If you can be "disbarred" from a professional society, you should be able to be expelled from a political organization for the same reprehensible behaviour...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
71. Our party?
My party, the Democratic Party, doesn't have a history of the lynch mob mentality. Perhaps you're thinking of another party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. Resigning won't save his license
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's not enough. Criminal charges must follow
and that includes charges for the so-called "victim" Crystal Gail Mangum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Ms Mangum should have been prosecuted for filing a false police report
just as the "Runaway Bride" was. Lucky for her, the North Carolina Attorney General cut her some slack based on her history of psychological disorders and drug abuse. The AG preferred to throw the book at Nifong instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #29
52. It's not entirely clear that she ever actually filed charges
She told the police that she had been raped that night, but she was extremely drunk and apparently on drugs, as well. The other stripper actually called the police because Mangum wouldn't get out of her car. When the police arrived they were going to arrest her for public drunkenness, etc., and that's when she started saying that she had been attacked. So the police took her to the hospital, following standard procedure. Mangum continued to say she had been raped, but her stories changed constantly even that night. The attending physician found no evidence of rape. The hospital sent her home that night.

News reports said that Mangum was surprised when the story surfaced a few weeks later. I don't think that she ever intended to press charges. I think that Nifong saw an opportunity and ran with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Mangum had wanted to continue with the case even
after special prosecutors took over.
Nifong was already gone, but she still wanted to continue to go forward.
Of course she continued to tell special prosecutors multiple stories that were not supported by evidence. But it does not look that Nifong forced Mangum to continue despite her wishes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. I don't think that Mangum did anything to perpetuate the case.
She has serious mental health problems and obvious drug and alcohol issues. Whenever she is interviewed she says something different. When the special prosecutors approached her, she said yes, go forward (telling yet another bizarre story).

However, if she had been left alone, I doubt that she ever would have gone downtown to file charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Since she alleged she was raped that first night, I don't think
police had other choice but investigate. She was taken to the hospital to have her SANE exam done. I don't think for investigation to proceed Mangum had to go somewhere and file charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. If Nifong had been a Republican,...
he would have made the Top Ten Conservative Idiots list 52 weeks running. Yet he remained conspicuously absent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Probably because he's NOT conservative
He's just rotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. perhaps we should have a Top Ten Democratic idiots of the week
Throw that one in the suggestion box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Yeah, lemme know how that works out
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Nifong is a lot of things, but there's no evidence that he is conservative.
I don't understand the point of your post, I guess. Are you saying that DU gives a pass to Democrats who behave badly? Nifong's been ripped up one side and down the other on these boards. For good reason, I'll add. The only people defending him are folks who know practically nothing at all about the case.

The Top Ten Conservative Idiots list is for conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Holy crap, some DUers were actually defending this guy?
I hope you mean only initially, and not after last fall or so.

I guess we have all kinds here on DU, but cheese and rice, talk about having blinders on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. You missed a lot of fireworks
IMO a majority of posters preached the Nifong fiction when the story broke, and like that Japanese soldier who hid on Iwo Jima for decades, an embarrassing number of them bunkered down and stuck to their dogma with rancor and mocking tones.

Use the search function if you doubt me.

Dogma, or to put it colloquially, believing what we want to believe instead of what evidence and sense tell us, affects partisans on both ends of the political spectrum. One might say it is a universal evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I can take a serious discussion with a difference of opinion
What gets my goat is people saying "Don't discuss the Duke case" and then proceed to rant that we ought to be discussing x, y, or z.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Quite true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
41. Go to the "Feminist" group - they're still convinced the EXHONERATED Duke Players are guilty...
strange bunch there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. They probably think that Tawana Brawley told the truth
When one associates victimhood with class, race, gender, or even religion, it is justice that suffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #46
60. IG, you've said it perfectly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #46
70. That's a right wing talking point
are you sure you're in the right forum?

Amazing how this case seems to make some DU'ers sound just like freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncabot22 Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #70
86. What?
How in the hell does Indiana Green sound like a freeper with that statement? IG makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountains539 Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #70
101. ok......
I seem to feel that you would be happier had this woman actually been raped so that the charges would have been true and the guys punished.

I just cant quite make out if you feel that they should be convicted because they drank underage, had a fist fight in the past, and legally hired a stripper...combined with the fact that they play lacrosse and went to a prestigious university.
I mean, come on.....its lacrosse. those jocks are treated like stars......whats the average starting salary for professional lacrosse these days.......1.5 million? 2 million? its hard to turn on the tv to watch some baseball or football and not have to wade around all those pro lacrosse games.

please explain the crimes that these guys commited, based on evidence that they should be punished for? good thing your son wasnt accidentally at that party or he could have been one of the ones falsely, randomly accused and you could be saddled with millions in legal bills.
are the crimes being white and playing sports and drinking at a party? those are the things that we KNOW they did and are.
I agree, big name revenue sports athletes are treated differently than the student body but this is lacrosse......a non revenue generating sport. the school cancelled the season. so they dont get punished? THEY CANCELLED THE SEASON! THEY FIRED THE COACH! THE BLACK PANTHERS ISSUED DEATH THREATS! THEY WERE SUSPENDED FROM SCHOOL FOR UNFOUNDED CHARGES!

ohhhh wait a minute....none of that ever happend because they played sports so they couldnt be touched
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #41
69. They are
They just got off on a technicality. Their behavior was despicable, if not outright criminal. They had a history of breaking the law and bad behavior. Just because they didn't get caught red-handed doesn't mean they're innocent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncabot22 Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #69
87. You are completely wrong
They didn't get off on a technicality; they were declared innocent by the AG of North Carolina. There was no evidence, no DNA, nothing to show that something happened that night.

However, if you have evidence something happened, keyboard prosecutor, please please post it and then forward it to the new Durham DA. I'm sure he/she would be glad to have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #69
90. Maybe you need to read up on this case a little
They didn't get off on a technicality. The AG took the usual step to not say there's not evidence, but declare these men innocent.

And please show me something more than drunk & disorderly and underage drinking as the "history of breaking the law and bad behavior."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #90
99. Very true. AG Cooper is a democrat and sensitive to the minority
issues. The special prosecutors looked at all the evidence, and obviously there was plenty of evidence of their innocence, such as photos, videos, and cell phone records.
That's not even taking into account DNA evidence that should have alone exonerated them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #69
93. Technicality? TECHNICALITY?! Like being entirely INNOCENT of the accused crime?!
THAT "technicality"?!

You are fucking NUTS!

Go back to the "Feminist" Group where you can resume your lynching of these INNOCENT boys...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
68. If he were a Republican
None of this would have been an issue, the news media would have ignored the story altogether and he would remain in his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Wrong tense.
"Will" is not what's needed; "have" is the required auxiliary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. I guess it's better late than never
:shrug: He should have resigned a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fazoolius_2006 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
32. Good riddance.
Now the players can sue his a$$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. I don't think they can win a suit.
DA's are protected from such lawsuits - or every defendant who was found not guilty would sue the DA for false prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. I think they might be able to
successfully sue Nifong. He might be a DA, but if the players can show that he acted outside the scope of his duties (which it appears he did), he many lose indemnity.

A DA who is prosecuting a case in good faith, but doesn't get a conviction is a whole other ball of wax than what Nifong did here. Nifong quite clearly acted in very, very bad faith.

...not an attorney nor do I play one on tv, just tossing in my 2 cents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #37
84. They also
wouldn't have much of a case. A lot more evidence is allowed in civil trials and the jocks had an unsavory past that won't help them much in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:17 AM
Original message
As well he should, and not a day too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
40. As well he should, and not a day too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. A couple important points
1) Victims?

A group of rich, white college kids who hold a wild drinking party and hire a couple of strippers could hardly be classed as "innocent victims" (unless you're a misogynist asshole, that is)

2) All DA's LIE. Big fucking DUH!!!

Mr. Nifong's crime is that this time his lies were designed to support the "prosecution" of a bunch of rich, white college jocks. BIG MISTAKE. If he'd kept to the usual job of a DA, prosecuting lower class whites and all people of color, he'd have no problem...that's just business as usual in the criminally-unjust system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. They are Nifong's victims
Being a victim is not a social designation--it means that the person is on the receiving end of some kind of particular injustice. In this matter the three students were victims of a dishonest DA, and they were declared innocent by his replacement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farraday Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. You're dodging the point
"A group of rich, white college kids who hold a wild drinking party and hire a couple of strippers could hardly be classed as "innocent victims""

Correct. However, they became victims when the stripper lied about them and ruined their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. And the "INNOCENT" part is of the rape and other charges...
No - they were not "innocent" in all senses...

They've probably "touched themselves" and even had "sex" once or twice, too...

Used profanity...

And - ohmygod - HIRED STRIPPERS - how horrible! (only - more correctly - one of these "strippers" was a LYING WHORE...who tried to ruin these INNOCENT boys lives)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. "ruined"
How?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #63
67. Let's see - being VILIFIED in public as RAPISTS?
Not letting finish playing their sport for the entire YEAR because of the trumed up charges and "assumed guilty" part?

Being forced to transfer out of Duke for some?

The list goes on, but go ahead and continue to defend the indefensible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #67
83. Maybe they'll think twice
before acting like drunken fratboys, getting a bad reputation on campus for drunken, violent behavior and hiring strippers and pawing them.

These kids are an accident waiting to happen. They may have gotten out of this fix, but the odds are high they'll get into more trouble. Many of their defenders think that's ok, but it isn't.

These kids are all too common on campuses these days. They were around when I was in school, too. Privleged, ignorant drunken jocks who were pretty much untouchable and unaccountable for their behavior. Girls learned early on to be very careful if they accidentally encountered them at a party. The best advice was to stop, look around for help and exit the room as quickly as possible.

My son accidentally encountered some while visiting a friend at another campus. It took him about 10 minutes to realize the situation he was in (drunken, obnoxious jocks looking for a fight) , enough time for them to start beating up a black girl who was at the party (they seem to have a problem w/ black women). My son and his friends quietly got up and headed for the door. When the drunken jocks knocked the black girl down the stairs in front of him, my son couldn't hold his tongue any longer and told them it wasn't necessary to beat up on the girl, she was leaving. Ten of them ganged up on him and his friend instead and beat them to a bloody pulp, leaving him with a concussion, black eyes and stitches. The cops driving by outside refused to do anything about it - they were football players and immune from prosecution.

My son learned a valuable lesson. He played football and ran track in high school, but now holds jocks with the greatest contempt, as do most other kids on campus. They're human garbage. Nifong had the guts to stand up to them and now he's paying the price for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #83
94. Yeah - next time someone rapes a woman because she was wearing sexy clothing, I'll count on your
condemning her too, right?

You are truly CLUELESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #83
98. I find it hard to believe that police would just ignore football
players beating up a woman and then your son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
104. Welcome to my ignore list
SO, so glad you're not MY dad.

Judgemental as hell, you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Hah? Just because somebody is rich, doesn't mean they can't
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 07:38 PM by lizzy
be victims.
And they were specifically called victims today, in Nifong's disbarment announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Rich? That's a huge assumption -
- and unless you've seen their parents tax returns you have no knowledge of their financial situation. MANY kids have put themselves through college via scholarships, student loans and working. Yes, these kids were jocks. Maybe they HAD to be jocks to get an athletic scholarship in order to attend the school of their choice. I sure don't know BUT I'm not going to blame them for being victimized because they happen to attend a school that some may equate with money.

Guess it's their fault for being white, too? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Oh, but a drunk car thief..

...who tried to run over a police officer with the stolen car, and then months later tries to dodge a probation violation when taken to detox after a drunk fight in a parking lot is definitely a victim.

Got it.

Two wrongs don't make a right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #43
50.  Innocent people being set up for something they didn't do is ok by you? What's wrong with you?
Meanwhile, Seligman's family had to borrow money from other people just to make bail for him. Maybe they're not quite the rich privileged bastards you love to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. I know reading is hard folks,
but nowhere did I say that it's ok for the fucking DA's to set anyone up.

Read my post.

I am suggesting that these drunken jocks, who hired a stripper hardly represent anyone that should merit praise of any kind. If it were my son or grandson I'd ask him, "what you got, shit for brains. I'm not sending you to college to fuck off!"

That a VERY UNUSUAL DA was willing to go after rich, white college kids is what's also very unusual and was the other point of my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. No doubt the only thing your offsprings do in college is study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #66
74. Why the hostility?
Why do you feel it necessary to attack people who don't approve of the behavior of the students? I can only imagine the kind of background you come from to condone it.

I agree with ProudDad. My sons are disgusted by this kind of behavior in fellow students. They know how to go to college, study and have a good time without making asses of themselves and victimizing others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #74
95. So when some yahoo trys to claim the "woman was asking for it" because of the way she dressed, we
can count on you to defend the rapist?

Convoluted bullshit like yours is truly priceless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #50
73. Innocent?
Do a little research. These kids had a history of problems. Seligmans should have done a better job of raising their son if they didn't want to get stuck with legal bills.

Fortunately, this kind of regressive, misogynist behavior has fallen out of favor on most campuses and most male students look down on the drunken frat boy types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #43
53. I think that you are missing the really important issue, which is prosecutorial misconduct
If we allow prosecutors to go around manufacturing evidence and/or hiding exculpatory evidence against people, then everyone is at risk.

There is no moral difference between Nifong railroading these men and the bush administration throwing people in Gitmo without charges or attorneys.

Yes, we heard about this case because those accused had the resources and connections to hire good private attorneys and get a lot of publicity and political pressure brought to this case.

Meanwhile, there are poor black and white people in jail because of similar cases in Durham and other places in North Carolina. Some of them have been on death row.

If we excuse Nifong because those unfairly accused were well-connected, then we're ignoring everyone else who has been victimized by unethical prosecutors and police. The next vicim might be you or me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. WHERE THE F*CK DID I SAY
excuse Nifong.

I'm saying that the actions of those college kids were also reprehensible, not that his weren't!

READING SKILLS PEOPLE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #53
75. You seem to be missing the point
Nifong or no Nifong, these kids behavior is still stupid and inexcusable and the efforts of right wingers, the news media and some on this forum to portray them as victims of some kind is ridiculous. If these kids didn't want to end up in court they should have cleaned up their act a long time ago. It wasn't the first nor will it be the last mistake these kids make. If their parents cared for them at all, they would be getting them some counseling and enforcing some rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #75
96. And hopefully Mangum is getting counseling too
A young woman with three children making her living as a stripper is not my idea of a healthy job choice--though there may be those who disagree with me. I hope she is able to use Jesse Jackson's offer to complete her education (at Duke, wouldn't that be ironic) and gets herself in a more stable line of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. Mangum never went to Duke. She went to NCCU.
Jesse offered to pay for her NCCU education.
By the way, it was a while ago so somebody should ask Jesse if the offer still stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. It would be awfully hard for him to pull back from what he said
I assume the offer still stands. Magnum has been held in seclusion, first by Nifong and later I guess she was just hiding from the media. And of course she had a child recently. Perhaps now she can start to put her life back together:

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/1091599/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #43
62. Alcohol and strippers are legal.
Some might argue that these things are not MORAL, but they are legal.

Watching a stripper perform is nowhere near committing rape, and it's a weakening of the seriousness of rape as a crime to conflate the two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #43
72. Very good points
Painting the jocks as victims has to be one of the most ridiculous things I've heard in a long time. As a parent of sons, this group had (and probably still has) a lot of problems when it comes to understanding boundaries.

Let's hope the next woman they victimize puts them in their place - behind bars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. puts them behind bars for hiring a stripper?
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 06:56 AM by CreekDog
Is that what you are saying OzarkMtnDem?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #72
80. Who the hell did they victimize?
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 07:58 AM by Mike Daniels
They hired a stripper which is completely legal.

The stripper came on her volition, performed under contract, accused a bunch of the students of raping her and was then revealed as a liar.

How in the hell is she a victim or anything other than her poor life choices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #80
102. You don't really think
Edited on Tue Jun-19-07 03:47 PM by ProudDad
that a gang of drunken jocks sat there politely, hands folded in their laps, while their employee fulfilled the terms of her lawful contract with them, do you?

If you do, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to talk to you about.

----------------------

I'd like to add point #3:

What the F*CK kind of country is it when a single-mother trying to get an education HAS to strip for a bunch of college jerks in order to pay for that education and her kids' food, clothing and housing? In a civilized society, we'd all help shoulder her burden and the burden of the less fortunate.

It's interesting to contrast the relative power and privilege of those white, college jocks with that of a black single-mother -- who is also trying to get a college education.


On Edit: POOR LIFE CHOICES!!!! Nice repuke talking point you've got there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #72
89. Sorry
drunk & disorderly, drinking underage, etc does not equal rape. I can't believe you'd even imply that these men deserved what happened to them.

Hiring a stripper may not be moral in your viewpoint, but it's entirely legal. BTW, she wasn't the only stripper there either, and the other didn't cry rape either.

Show me evidence they've ever victimized a woman before, otherwise, it's time for you to step off your high horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #89
103. Reading;
a lost art it appears.

No where did I say or imply that they deserved to be the targets of a rogue prosecutor.

In fact, my point was how unusual it was that affluent white jocks were the target of such an action by a DA. It usually NEVER happens to people of that class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celeborn Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-19-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
105. She was a lying
bitch, whore. She deserves everything that's coming to her. And who the fuck are you to decide that hiring strippers is immoral? Are you a part of the puritan Left that wants to censor sexuality as much as the fundies do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
79. Does Anyone Know
if this Nifong is a democrat? The republican blogs are claiming he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. Yes he is a democrat.
Edited on Mon Jun-18-07 08:12 AM by lizzy
The republicans in Durham don't have much of a chance to be elected anywhere.
This case happened before a primary in which his opponents were a white female and a black male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #81
82. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. Pretty nasty of your Ozark Mountain Dem
Calling the poster above you a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. Uncalled for
Lizzy's anything but a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #82
92. Not only are you being mean-spirited, but ignorant, too - lizzy is bonafide true blue n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC