Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FBI Would Skirt the Law With Proposed Phone Record Program, Experts Say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:39 PM
Original message
FBI Would Skirt the Law With Proposed Phone Record Program, Experts Say
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 02:43 PM by RamboLiberal
Source: ABC News

A proposed new FBI program would skirt federal laws by paying private companies to hold millions of phone and Internet records which the bureau is barred from keeping itself, experts say.

The $5 million project would apparently pay private firms to store at least two years' worth of telephone and Internet activity by millions of Americans, few of whom would ever be considered a suspect in any terrorism, intelligence or criminal matter.

The project would involve "the development of data storage and retrieval systems...for at least two years' worth of network calling records," according to an unclassified budget document posted to the FBI's Web site. The FBI did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

The FBI is barred by law from collecting and storing such data if it has no connection to a specific investigation or intelligence matter.



Read more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/fbi-would-skirt.html



WTF - this sounds like Poindexter again! And what shadowy Repuke patron's firm will be collecting the cash for skirting the Constitution?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. That can't be legal.
It can't be held specifically or exclusively for the FBI and not be construed as a matter of law as being records the FBI itself is holding. That it's by proxy shouldn't matter at all under the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hold on! I'm gonna take a wild guess and say that it's ChoicePoint doing this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm really starting to wonder what the hell we even have laws for - if
all our government wants to do is "skirt" them. With Justice Department and other operatives asking each other - "isn't there a way we can get around this?" WHY THE HELL ARE WE EVEN BOTHERING WITH LAWS ANYMORE???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC