Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Criticizes Democrats on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:21 PM
Original message
Bush Criticizes Democrats on Iraq
Source: The Guardian

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush, ratcheting up a fight with Congress over Iraq, accused Democrats on Friday of conducting a political debate on the war while delaying action on money to upgrade equipment and give troops a pay raise.

In his remarks, Bush said the war has had ``frustrating setbacks. It's also had important successes.'' He pointed to the turnaround in Anbar province and the capture of one of al-Qaida's top leaders in Iraq.

``Our nation deserves a serious debate about Iraq,'' Bush said, ``because the outcome of this conflict will have enormous consequences for our country.''

``Failure in Iraq would send an unmistakable signal to America's enemies that our country can be bullied into retreat,'' the president said. ``America's involvement in Iraq does not have to end this way. A free and stable Iraq is still in reach.''



Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6793923,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because they've been so effective to do what a clear majority
of We The People want (the end of that endless money pit and bloodbath for the oligarchy's status quo)?

Lil' king george's state of denial stays the course as he ratchets up a fight with Congress (for what, again?). :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. typical-------blame someone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. ..........
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 01:24 PM by alyce douglas
always that is the part of his disease.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_Wing_Authoritarianism

Significant Correlations
Altemeyer discovered a wide range of correlations over the years, which can be organized into four general categories. (The Authoritarian Specter)

1: Faulty reasoning — RWAs are more likely to:

Make many incorrect inferences from evidence.
Hold contradictory ideas that result from a cognitive attribute known as compartmentalized thinking.
Uncritically accept that many problems are ‘our most serious problem.’
Uncritically accept insufficient evidence that supports their beliefs.
Uncritically trust people who tell them what they want to hear.
Use many double standards in their thinking and judgments.
2: Hostility Toward Outgroups — RWAs are more likely to:

Weaken constitutional guarantees of liberty such as the Bill of Rights.
Severely punish ‘common’ criminals in a role-playing situation.
Admit they obtain personal pleasure from punishing such people.
Be prejudiced against racial, ethnic, nationalistic, and linguistic minorities.
Be hostile toward homosexuals.
Volunteer to help the government persecute almost anyone.
Be mean-spirited toward those who have made mistakes and suffered.
3: Profound Character Attributes — RWAs are more likely to:

Be dogmatic.
Be zealots.
Be hypocrites.
Be absolutists
Be bullies when they have power over others.
Help cause and inflame intergroup conflict.
Seek dominance over others by being competitive and destructive in situations requiring cooperation.
4: Blindness To One’s Own Failings And To The Failings Of Authority Figures Whom They Respect— RWAs are more likely to:

Believe they have no personal failings.
Avoid learning about their personal failings.
Be highly self-righteous.
Use religion to erase guilt over their acts and to maintain their self-righteousness.
RWA is also correlated with political conservatism — not so much at the level of ordinary voters, but with increasing strength as one moves from voters to activists to office holders, and then from lower- to higher-level officeholders. (The Authoritarian Specter)

In one part of his summation, Altemeyer wrote that RWAs are more likely to be: "Conservative/Reform party (Canada) or Republican Party (United States) lawmakers who (1) have a conservative economic philosophy; (2) believe in social dominance; (3) are ethnocentric; (4) are highly nationalistic; (5) oppose abortion; (6) support capital punishment; (7) oppose gun-control legislation; (8) say they value freedom but actually want to undermine the Bill of Rights; (9) do not value equality very highly and oppose measures to increase it; (10) are not likely to rise in the Democratic party, but do so among Republicans." (The Authoritarian Specter)

Altemeyer's own statement about this may be worth noting (from p. 239 of "Enemies of Freedom"): "right-wing authoritarians show little preference in general for any political party," and their prevalence in the Republican party reflects the long term effects of point (10) above.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. He can blow it out his ass.
Oh wait, that's tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. oh shut the fuck up, you stupid man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I was just going to post that
Except I would've replaced "stupid man" with something far more vulgar. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. The money won't be gone until Oct.
According to Harry Reid the military has enough funds to continue through October. We have plenty of time to talk about funding the war and pullout timetables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Upgrade equipment and a pay raise? Poleeeeez. Next, he'll talk about the children. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's so wrong. All the dems have done is give lip service and cave in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. What a Liar
Just the other day, bush refused a 3.5% proposed military raise by dems. This guy is something else - only a sociopatch can lie and convince themselves that it is o.k. What a coward; what a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He's delusional n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bush: if you look closely enough, you can actually
find some grains of truth.

Translation
"Our nation deserves a serious debate about Iraq"
= We should probably tell you why we're really there = O-I-L

"because the outcome of this conflict will have enormous consequences for our country."
= We need to secure the Iraqi oil for ourselves, as Peak Oil starts to hit. When we start running out, you will all be grateful to me that I made sure it's ours.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. If he had really wanted to win a war, he would have done it
long ago. His administration is just trying to keep us at war for a very long time. It serves as a distraction for other things being done and gives them an excuse to increase their control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Isn't this "old news"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. "America's involvement in Iraq does not have to end this way. A free and stable Iraq is still in
reach."

Translation:

"Free Iraqi oil is still within reach."

When bush says the involvement doesn't have to end "this way" he's showing that the administration is already resigned to losing Iraq and having this whole debacle become the TURNING POINT for moving toward total alternative energy and zero dependence on oil, destroying Big Energy's plan to ride out peak oil for maximum profits.

Big Energy now hates bush for f*cking this whole deal up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC