Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mention the President, Lose a Case? Defense motion to ban George W. Bush's name at trial defeated.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:22 PM
Original message
Mention the President, Lose a Case? Defense motion to ban George W. Bush's name at trial defeated.
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 05:26 PM by djg21
Source: Law.com

Apparently President George W. Bush is now so unpopular that some lawyers believe the mere mention of his name in front of a jury could tip the scales against them.

Attorneys Michael P. Laffey and Robert P. DiDomenicis of Holsten & Associates in Media, Pa., are defending Upper Darby Township, Pa., in a civil rights suit brought by Harold Lischner, an 82-year-old doctor who claims he was falsely arrested for displaying an anti-war sign at a Bush campaign event in September 2003.

With the case set to go to trial on July 23, the defense lawyers recently filed a flurry of motions, including one that asked Eastern District of Pennsylvania Judge Gene E.K. Pratter to prohibit the plaintiff from mentioning Bush's name.

. . . .

Bush's identity, they argued, "in and of itself, presents the danger that the jury will favor plaintiff.


. . . .

(District Court Judge Gene E.K. Pratter (E.D. Pa.)) found that the message on Lischner's sign and Bush's identity, as well as the circumstances surrounding his visit -- including the war in Iraq and Bush's bid for re-election -- are "relevant to the determination of probable cause and to the adequacy of Upper Darby's training and policies."

. . . .

Read more: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1184869654447



Interesting read!

The judge got it right. I just wonder why no claim was asserted for First Amendment Retailation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. hahahahahha rolf rofl, soooo true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha ha-ha-ha-haaaaaa!
The defense wanted to eliminate bush's name from the proceedings even though the proceedings were about a sign with bush's name on it. What a bunch of idiots. Of course they're going to lose this case. His rights were trampled by bush's local henchmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Man, that township and its attorneys are compleat idiots!
First they violate the plaintiff's free speech rights, then they mount the stupidest defense known to mankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WileEcoyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. They had to try it anyway.
If the procedure had worked it could have helped their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. It's all so frivolous. They should have settled out of court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bwahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
:rofl:

That's one desperate lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Send this one to Keith!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lolz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bwah-HAH!
Sad to think this man was arrested for protesting the Chimpenfuehrer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can he say Ass-hat instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. no, that's Bushitler Nutfuckery, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. I thought it was Chimpy McCokespoon..
:shrug:

Are you saying I've been getting the Resident's name wrong for the last 7 years?!?!?!

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Chimp should have listened to Dr. Lischner
He could have avoided going down as the worst President in American History.

at a Bush campaign event in September 2003. . . . Lischner, then 78 years old, was one of the 50 members of the public gathered along the driveway and had placed a torso-sized sign on the front of his chest with a message that stated:

"Withdraw our troops from Iraq. Give the $87 billion to the Iraqi governing council and U.N. for immediate relief and repair of the destruction we caused."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's a no lose situation...
Imagine going to trial against, "He who cannot be named!" LOL :rofl:

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Court docs here

One of the attorneys' motions (specific to Bush):

http://www.johnberryhill.com/upperdarby/motion.pdf

The judge's order (on a number of preliminary motions):

http://www.johnberryhill.com/upperdarby/order.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. "The mere mention of his name... could tip the scales against them".
Mmmmmmmm.....
Remember when 82% of Americans were worshipping this asshole?

My, how the mighty have fallen. ^_^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Upper Darby is notorious for its corrupt Republican machine
built over twenty years by Curt Weldon (PA-7). His loss to Adm. Joe Sestak in November was a political sea change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Curt Weldon didn't "build" squat.
He was handpicked by John McNichol, the boss of the very powerful Upper Darby machine, to run for county council and then for Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. "But Judge, we can't possibly win this case if the plaintiff gets to say what it's about!"
Gahhhhhh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-20-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. How about the woman who was arrested in Maine recently...
Edited on Fri Jul-20-07 11:31 PM by GoddessOfGuinness
for crossing a police line back when Dumbyass and Pukin' were meeting?

Any chance her case will be heard in court?

There have been so many instances of illegal arrest, all over the country. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemSoccerMom Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. Personally, I think
that anyone who uses *'s name in public should be drawn and quartered . . .

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MotorCityMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
23. It's a stealth Harry Potter tie-in
* is now He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
24. So if the judge had agreed, would they have had to say "He who must not be named"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
25. Wow, what a misleading headline...
Edited on Sun Jul-22-07 11:38 AM by hughee99
In the example they give, the plaintiff wants to mention *'s name, and the defense is arguing that to do so would help the plaintiff win their case. Doesn't this mean the defense believes mentioning *'s name will HELP THE PLAINTIFF WIN, not lose.

Am I reading this wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC