Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

County home foreclosures rise 551% in first half of 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 07:49 PM
Original message
County home foreclosures rise 551% in first half of 2007
Source: UNION-TRIBUNE





By Emmet Pierce
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

11:31 a.m. July 24, 2007

SAN DIEGO – Home foreclosures in San Diego County continued their troublesome upward climb in June, but analysts say the number has yet to reach a threshold that creates a drag on real estate prices or the economy at large. “California is better off than the nation and San Diego County is better off than California,” said researcher John Karevoll of DataQuick Information Systems. “It still is not a major factor in the real estate market, but if there is a recession, it could become a huge factor.”

DataQuick reported on Tuesday that during the first half of 2007 San Diego County had 2,896 foreclosures compared to 445 during the first half of 2006, a 551 percent increase. From May to June of this year, foreclosures increased from 532 to 657, a 24 percent increase.

Notices of default, the first step in the foreclosure process, totaled 8,314 for the first six months of 2007, compared to 3,311 in the same period last year, a 151 percent increase. From May to June of this year, default notices rose from 1,441 to 1,596, an 11 percent increase.

Statewide, mid-year default figures were the highest in more than a decade. Across California, lenders filed 100,703 notices of default during the first half of the year, up 153 percent from 39,765 for the same period last year. For June, there were 19,834 default notices statewide, a rise of nearly 12 percent from 17,751 in May.


Read more: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20070724-1131-bn24default.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. You can go to the emergency room!
Oh, wait, that's *'s other economic disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link to additional information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Foreclosures go through the roof in CA-up 800%
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 08:11 PM by fed-up
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/07/25/BU44R6ES42.DTL


Foreclosures go through the roof
Carolyn Said, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 25, 2007

The number of Bay Area homes lost to foreclosure during the second quarter hit the highest level in almost two decades, and the region's homeowners also received a record-high number of mortgage default notices, according to a report to be released today.
California also set a record in the April-to-Jun

...

Big numbers
-- 7,696 The number of Bay Area homeowners who received notices of default in the last quarter, up from 2,910 in the same period last year.
-- 53,943 The number of California homeowners who got notices of default, up from 20,909 from the same period last year.
-- 800 The percent increase of homes in California whose deeds reverted to bank ownership.
Source: DataQuick Information Systems
E-mail Carolyn Said at csaid@sfchronicle.com.





Luckily I sold and got out of my fixed/arm last Nov- but unfortunately ended up buying a former undisclosed meth lab-I may just wait one more year to buy again (if/when I can rescind this contract) and hopefully will end up saving from $20-40K...


I grew up in San Bruno and can't believe a 1200 sq ft 50 year old house sells for close to $800K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think San Bruno 1200 sq ft is now about 750k, even sub 700 if you don't mind airplanes
I'm looking in San Bruno!

Heck, except that I already own a condo in SSF, I'm trying to buy into this market since I can actually afford something now. So, I don't think Bay Area prices will come down much --too many people on the sidelines waiting.

The way I figure it, my place at 500k loses 10% to 450k. But the place I want to trade up to goes from 750k to 675k. I make 25k progess towards the elusive detached home. Though in actuality, I just break even because of the realtor commission, which I don't begrudge, a good one actually works hard and only gets a portion of it in the final analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I grew up in the Crestmoor area-a little further from the flight path (most of the time)
pm me if you have any questions about neighborhoods

Rollingwood is foggier

watch for homes on hillsides due to slippery/sliding clay during prolonged periods of rain

I was in SB from 1996-1999 taking care of my mother and got to witness the devastation from the landslides

also be aware that you are about 1-2 miles from the San Andreas Fault...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here's one on the street I grew up on
http://www.sanbrunohomevalues.com/home_values/list.php

Active

2321 Princeton Dr

$800,000

3/2

1,140

49


one recently sold

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/06/17/REHS_smateo.txt
Sunday, June 17, 2007

2440 Princeton Drive
$825,000, 3 bdrms, 1360 sq. ft., 1958
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Up 551% but analysts say it has yet to create a drag on RE or the economy?
Are these analysts the same pimple-faced analysts that kept telling all to continue buying tech stocks in 2000 while the bottom was falling out of the NASDAQ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanglefoot Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That'd be my guess
Got very little respect for those idjits. Still haven't made back all my rollover losses in 2001. Bastids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Shhhhh!!
They must not let everyone know that all those mortgage backed CDOs may need to unwind at a substantial loss - lots of banks have not properly marked a lot of their complicated mortgage derivatives - partly because of the hell that realizing a multi-billion dollar loss would cause to their bonuses when they mark-to-market...and partly because it is genuinely hard to find an accurate price for a lot of the securities they have traded that have moved against them (These are often OTC contracts that have unique characteristics and cash flows, so quotes are hard to come by).

Look at stocks CFC, CIT, MTG, RDN...not doing very well....lots of mortgage exposure...much of it is NOT sub-prime....

Subprime is spilling over into the credit market at large. Cerberus Capital could not get the $12B funding they needed for buying Chrysler from Daimler....they will have to try again...and KKR was not able to sell their $10B of debt to buy Alliance Boots in that LBO. The large number of other LBOs are threatened out there as well as many deal names have fallen greatly in value due to the credit crunch of funding their purchases...see Alltel (AT), CCU (Clear Channel), TXU (Texas Utilities), RDN (from above - MTG is buying them), First Data Corp (FDC), Archstone (ASN), and many others. There is a credit crunch right now - it started with subprime and it is continuing toi spill over all of the corporate debt markets these days. So far, the stock market has not been affected too much as it is near its record highs - however, volatility is also quite high now. Things are getting a little risky out there....

Oh..and who has been funding all of these LBOs that have close? A lot of investment banks are on the hook for that....Goldman Sachs has made a fortune in the LBO craze....they are exposed to the LBOs and the defaults that will inevitably occur down the road - they could lose billions from funding all of these deals. Stay tuned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. how in the hell does anyone afford these houses?
most of the houses i looked at in another post would`t top 350 where i am at. my house would be "worth" over 600 and it`s appraised at just over 100....dam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. uggg...you should see Manhattan...
where a one bedroom with 800 Sq feet could easily run a million or more. Ridiculous...NYC is one of the few places wehre real estate is still super hot. Housing is up 11% YTD here. Mostly because large Wall Street bonuses means lots of money for young rich people buying homes. A bad year for Wall St and look out below on NYC housing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Beats me - I make more money than I did in 1994 when I bought mine, BUT...
...I could not possibly afford to buy my house on my salary now, if I was just starting out.

:freak:

I think only DINKs (Dual Income No Kids) have any hope of buying houses in SoCal at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gee... maybe paying $750,000 for 10 sq. ft. of wartime house was a bad idea?
nah!

It's California, every worthless little half-million dollar plus shack is a foolproof investment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. I couldn't imagine...
paying for a house that's 8 1/2 times my yearly salary. I just couldn't. When reprehensor and I bought in 2002 outside Dallas, we had a certain amount allotted, and bought beneath it. We wanted to make sure we could make the payments even if one of us lost a job.

We could have afforded $160,000 worth of house. We looked at $110,000 houses, and found one at $105,000. Sure enough, with me working in telecom, I got laid off in 2005. But I got the golden handshake-- four months worth of salary, vacation, and a bonus in lieu of notice. We were just fine.

I could never live in California. I'd be a nervous wreck all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. CLAP HARDER boys and girls, CLAP HARDER!
There's nothing wrong boys and girls! CLAP HARDER and Tinkerbelle will spritz you with her fairy dust and everything will be fine, CLAP HARDER!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC