Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ranger: Shooters could not have been 10 yards from Tillman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:12 PM
Original message
Ranger: Shooters could not have been 10 yards from Tillman
Source: espn.com

The Army Ranger who was alongside Pat Tillman when he was shot in Afghanistan told ESPN.com Friday that he remains convinced that the former NFL player was accidentally killed by friendly fire, rather than a target of a malicious act......



The doctors, whose names were blacked out, said that the bullet holes were so close together that it appeared the former Arizona Cardinals safety was cut down by a weapon fired from a mere 10 yards or so away.

"No, there is no way the guy was 10 yards away. That is just completely unlikely," O'Neal told ESPN.com. "If he was there initially, like the way the conspiracy theorists work that he was there to kill Pat, why wouldn't he have killed me? That doesn't work so well. "

"There is no way that was the case ," O'Neal said. "You'd be able to make out their face. You'd know exactly who was shooting. Yeah, there is no possible way they were just 10 yards away."

Read more: http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=2951521



discuss......

interesting to me, that this guy comes out now, at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Note how he carefully demeans the "conspiracy theories"
Most crimes are solved by recognizing conspiracy theories. In fact, it makes more sense that they would
"leave him" alive to say all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because O'Neal
wasn't the target, that's why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
39. Or he was the shooter...
The one eye witness to the crime swears that he didn't see anything? It would suggest that either he's being handsomely paid to obscure the truth or his finger was on the trigger. This guy needs to be arrested and held as a material witness to a homicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. He is the guy that Tillman told to "stop sniveling"
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 05:19 PM by daleo
Perhaps he wasn't really able to observe what happened (i.e. he had his head down). His denials seem rather tenuous ("completely unlikely") for someone who was an eye witness.

On edit: Here's a bit more detail on that:

"The chaplain said that O'Neal told him he was hugging the ground at Tillman's side, "crying out to God, help us. And Tillman says to him, `Would you shut your mouth? God's not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling ..."

O'Neal told ESPN.com his words did not match the chaplain's recollection. "The way he put it is wrong. I wouldn't say it is entirely inaccurate," he said."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not very convincing. the fact the whole thing was covered up for so long
is very suspicious.

Didn't this guy know right off it was a friendly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. That guy might be responsible for this...he was close to him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. And the fact that they burned his personal effects (clothes, diary) bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. This sounds like a guy who needs a lawyer, IMO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well, Tllman's head wasn't down. 3 in the forehead?
Is that a typical wound pattern from an M-16 (person who knows nothing about guns asking)? Is that how soldiers are trained to shoot? Three tight shots to the head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I am no gun expert
But I did read in another thread that some M-16s are designed to file a burst of three bullets. At 600 rounds per minute, that would only take a few hundredths of a second, and it would naturally result in a tight pattern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. M4 and M16 are capable of that group
and every soldier from clerk to infantry is trained to fire in controlled bursts of 3 rounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. You'd be wrong on the tight pattern
The weapon jerks and climbs through the expenditures unless it's being carefully aimed and it's pattern countered.

This was an aimed burst with a braced barrel. My guess, sniper style, prone position.

This guy talking would have known from the blast that the weapon was fired close. 10 yards, 30 ft, and missed him a few feet high. It's breath taking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Like a combat vet, who had thousands of rounds
downrange from an M4. He would be comfortable putting 3 shots in someones head at 10yards. I never shot at any range target closer than 100m but am positive an m4 could group 4 - 6 inches at that distance.

By the way if these guys were on contact and returning fire they would have diminished hearing from gunshots.

He was shot by a fellow Ranger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. He must have been leaning against something.
You know how it is, Pavulon.

Even a short burst to the forehead at close range is going to wander around on the forehead.

Of course, Tillman was a pretty strong guy.

I still think the first hit would have wobbled his head around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I know how when people screw up
it ruins their careers. The army has zero tolerance and this promotes cover up mentality. I was NG and did not give a shit about a career but when fraud waste abuse came up it was either pinned to a person or went away.

I did not use the M4 or M16 on anything other than qualifying ranges. Cant say how it groups at 10 yards. But I could guess it would be possible to make that shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midniteagle Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #24
40. M-16s can empty a 20 round
magazine in 3 seconds...... that is 6 rounds in less than 1 second, if it was a burst of three, they would have been fired in about half a second., and entered his forhead at the same rate of speed from that short of a distance. I dont know how fast or far the forhead would react to that kind of impact, but the shot pattern would be very tight. I am a Viet Nam Era Vet, and was Security Police in the USAF, and highly trained with the M-16 during my active duty service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sanskritwarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Agreed
I have many paper targets where I put 3 rounds into a 3 inch pattern on 3 round burst.......I have been firing an M-16 for 14 years.......Conspiracy theorists want to believe this so badly............. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Well...
When I was in the army we were taught to aim at center mass. A three round burst can be pretty tight if controlled properly and at closer range. Obviously the longer the range the greater the scattering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Head is not a center mass. It's harder to hit the head.
I believe police officers are told to shoot at the body, not the head.
From what was reported, Tillman was shot three times in the forehead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. percisely
I was also trained to aim for center mass (the trunk of the body) when I was in the service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. yeah but if you know your target has body armor... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. It seems to me it would take a lot of skill
to shoot someone in the head with three bullets close to each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Short burst...
I, being someone who has shot a good number of people with an M16, questioned this thing from the start.

When they said he took three to the forehead, I really started wondering.

If it was the thorax, I would understand.

He must have been propped up. Leaning against something.

But I do believe that it was just a fuck-up followed by an inept cover-up.

Anyway, that is my opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. funny he says "there is no way they were 10 yards away". Sounds like he never
saw any of it. Why doesn't he just say "I was there and the shooter was far away, so gar away we could not see him...". My guess is, this guy has an ax to grind or he was just so out of it thyat he never saw anything, 10 yards or 2 yards away. If he was hugging the ground, chances are his head was buried in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a very odd story.
Three tight shots to the forehead could only happen "accidently" from very close range. But if this guy was next to Tillman, he'd know the shooters identity. If this happened from a distance, it would have to be a professional hit.

I would think an autopsy could conclude the distance away the shots were fired. They have the slugs...did they ever match to the rifle(s) they came from? If not, why not?

The fact that he tries to immediately refute a "conspiracy theory" makes me wonder if there was some kind of hit done on Tilman...a conspiracy, if you will.

There's a lot that we don't know about this whole story, but I think there's more than enough evidence that a criminal investigation is warranted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. The facts are unclear.
The cover up is the essential fact. The dissemination of an utterly false story to cover up a truth that was not "pretty." That is so Bush-co. It is an insult to the American people. As for the truth, we will probably never know it. Clearly the 'Army Ranger" either did not see the shooting or is lying. Either way, he will not make a good witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. "...completely unlikely." That's a good one.
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 06:23 PM by Boo Boo
Tell ya what, Skippy, maybe you're the guy that did it. That would explain why "he" didn't kill you, wouldn't it. Or, maybe it was another guy in your unit, which would also explain why "he" didn't kill you. Maybe somebody (like you, for instance) was walking around with their finger on the bang switch and accidently shot Tillman in the head, and the Bush Admin decided to give Tillman the Jessica Lynch treatment.

All the doctors are saying is that the evidence is not consistent with the story that was told. And since y'all have already been caught lying and destroying evidence, well, it's a little hard to believe anything you say unless you're saying it while under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Limelight Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Hell...
Even under oath the sh*t is suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. That's a stupid accusation on your part
O'Neal was actually a friend of Tillman's, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
35. Hoo boy, I was just about to say the same damn thing myself... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well I guess there was no cover up either, we should all trust Bushco more
come on why would they lie to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. "Jackass"???
O'Neal not only was a) there, when it happened; b) himself shot; he was c) Tillman's friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is there any way Tillman could have been hit 4 times while this guy was missed
altogether, standing "alongside him"? Sounds fishy to a non-com like me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Limelight Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Sounds like he wasn't so much "standing"...
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 06:49 PM by Limelight
As ducking. :yoiks:

Don't get me wrong, somebody shoots at me I duck too. But, watching KO's segment from the last day or two, he quoted the official report on Tillman's death that quoted Tillman's last words as being something to the effect of "Would you shut your f*cking mouth?! God's not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself you sniveling..." as he was talking to someone nearby who was balled up on the ground, crying out for God to same him (or something to that effect). Gotta wonder if Mr. Forensic and Ballistics expert here is the one who's ass Pat was breaking his shoe off in?

Apparently Pat didn't get to finish chewing the guy out before he caught three to the noggin. Three shots in a two inch diameter (which sounds to me like a 3 round burst from an M-16 or whatever it is they use now) from a moving Humvee?

Only if this is just the next installment of Bruce Willis in "Die Hard". Otherwise it's plain bullsh*t... the kind I wouldn't pay to see I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. posted last night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. If I were part of a conspiracy and cover up, I also would be trying to cover my ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
32. One thing about this just scares the bejeezus out of me...
...if there is no consipracy to cover up the truth, why won't Bush and company release the documents they have on this? What is in those documents that they're not willing to disclose? How high does this go? And why haven't more of his fellow soldiers come out to clear the air? What are THEY hiding? It would be easy enough to say, "Look, he was out there, we lost contact, and things got very confusing." Their silence is deafening. If this was homocide, I hope everyone who had ANYTHING to do with it rots in hell. Pat Tillman was a hero, and did things for the right reason. He didn't deserve this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. "He never would have called me 'sniveling,'" O'Neal said.
This thread is full of cherry-picked fragments that cast Tillman in a poor light. O'Neal's testimony is exculpatory, but you wouldn't know it from this thread.

Read this article:
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070729/D8QM1Q380.html


A chaplain who debriefed the entire unit days after Tillman's death later described this exchange to investigators conducting a criminal probe of the incident. But O'Neal strongly disputes portions of the chaplain's testimony, outlined in some 2,300 pages of transcripts released to the AP this week by the Defense Department in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

The chaplain told investigators that O'Neal said Tillman was harsh in his last moments, snapping, 'Would you shut your (expletive) mouth? God's not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling ..."

"He never would have called me 'sniveling,'" O'Neal said. "I don't remember ever speaking to this chaplain, and I find this characterization of Pat really upsetting. He never once degraded me. He's the only person I ever worked for who didn't degrade anyone. He wasn't that sort of person."

The chaplain's name is blacked out in the documents.


Why are conspiracy theories on DU *ALWAYS* favorable to the left view? Doesn't that bother anyone here? It sure bothers me - it tells me a blindness invoked by ideology infests many DUers' thinking more than is acknowledged. I'm not saying that those who arrive at their conclusions after sound analysis are blind, whatever their conclusions. I'm saying I see here that critical thinking gets tossed out the window when ideology puts the conclusion ahead of the facts.

To my thinking, given the eye-witness testimony of the man standing next to Tillman at the moment of his death, the chaplain's testimony is the less trustable version. Tillman was well-liked and respected, nearly universally so. Even a few rogues who could have hated him (none have been identified) would know that his comrades would figure out what happened, ferret them out, and eliminate them in a most unpleasant way. The discipline and connection in elite units such as Tillman's are clearly beyond the ken of most of those who posted up-thread.

Trying to make political hay from Tillman's death disgusts me. That goes for transgressors on the left as well as on the right.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
38. I told you I told you guys I TOLD YOU GUYS that they offed him
I told you.

I saw the part about the retired General losing a star while we were on vacation (almost completely avoided the news)over this but of course no mention was made of the details of this report.

I
TOLD
YOU

as did others here. This smelled from the getgo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC