Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study Blames Climate Change for Hurricanes (Amount Doubled Over Past Century)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:36 PM
Original message
Study Blames Climate Change for Hurricanes (Amount Doubled Over Past Century)
Source: Reuters

Study blames climate change for hurricanes
Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:51PM EDT

MIAMI (Reuters) - The number of Atlantic hurricanes in an average season has doubled in the last century due in part to warmer seas and changing wind patterns caused by global warming, according to a study released on Sunday.

Hurricane researchers have debated for years whether climate change caused by greenhouse gases from cars, factories and other human activity is resulting in more, and more intense, tropical storms and hurricanes.

- snip -

In the new study, conducted by Greg Holland of the National Center for Atmospheric Research and Peter Webster of Georgia Institute of Technology, researchers found three periods since 1900 when the average number of Atlantic tropical storms and hurricanes increased sharply, and then leveled off and remained steady.

- snip -

From 1900 to 1930, Atlantic hurricane seasons saw six storms on average, with four hurricanes and two tropical storms. From 1930 to 1940, the annual average rose to ten, including five hurricanes. From 1995 to 2005, the average rose to 15, with eight hurricanes and seven tropical storms, the researchers said.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2932962720070730?feedType=RSS


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's the liberal media that's to blame. And Bill Clinton's wienie and Jane
Fonda and Michael Moore and secular humanism.

Let's put it where it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now that's just silly...
People weren't living, like they are now, where hurricans struck in the last century...

No way to measure...

No way to track the storms that didn't hit populated areas...

I am a firm believer in Global Warming but this is just bad science since the data collected now is ar superior to the data collected even in the 1940's...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's the 'scientists' trying to defend their study, from the same article.
But Holland and Webster said the improved data from the last half of the century cannot be solely responsible for the increase.

"We are led to the confident conclusion that the recent upsurge in the tropical cyclone frequency is due in part to greenhouse warming, and this is most likely the dominant effect," the authors wrote.

---

It'd have been nice if they'd detailed to the media what is it that "led" them to this "confident conclusion," because it sure as hell ain't studying the frequency of hurricanes. It's outside bias they happily bring to the subject matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-29-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Flooding is really going to continue to be a very big problem
for everybody and its going to get worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And that has not one thing to do with the study here.
Scientists should follow the scientific method, IMHO. The conclusion they came up with might as well be based on your statement just now as from the study being cited. It's equally valid evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes it is.
With numbers as small as 6-14 storms per year, not having accurate data is HUGE! They also never discuss how they came to the conclusion better data (which should drive the number up), isn't the largest factor.

I hate bad science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, it's the sodomites and Daylight Savings!
The human rectum has no natural lubrication. Which means more friction. And more friction generates more heat, which increases global warming.

Also, when we set our clocks back an hour so that we get more daylight, the Earth heats up!

See also:


Anti-Gay Holocaust Revisionist Brian Camenker complaining and lying again
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=221x53536

And

Daylight Savings Exacerbates Global Warming
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x97804
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-30-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. for those interested...
Instead of the journalists report of the study, here is the actual study. Still don't see how they can ignore the increase of data though.

www.mmm.ucar.edu/people/holland/files/NaturalVariabilityOrClimateTrend.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC