Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arkansas couple welcomes 17th child

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:21 AM
Original message
Arkansas couple welcomes 17th child
Source: Associated Press

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. - It's a girl — again — for the Duggars. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar welcomed their 17th child, and seventh daughter, into the world Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jennifer Danielle was born at 10:01 a.m. at Saint Mary's Hospital in Rogers, Ark., the Duggars said in an interview. Jennifer weighed 8 pounds, 8 ounces and arrived five days after Michelle's due date.

Less than 30 minutes after giving birth, the Duggars already were talking of having more.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070803/ap_on_fe_st/17_kids



Have these people heard of OVERPOPULATION? And they're planning to have more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Feel For the Children
Being raised by such stupid parents....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Yeah, each kid gets about 3 minutes of quality time a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Are You Sure About That?
Or is that only when the parents aren't gettin' busy working on their next sibling?

Seriously, do you get the feeling this has slipped into the realm of COLLECTING children the way some people do about pets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. I had a co-worker who came from a family like that
14 kids. The mother would lose interest in the youngest child once it learned to walk and would foist it upon the other children, who were learning parenting skills far too early. The mother would then be planning for the NEXT "cute little bundle of joy". She did indeed seem like one of those cat ladies who just can't collect enough of them. My coworker was a freeper, and had serious problems interacting with others because of the neglect she suffered early in life. Among her many quirks; diving into a bread basket during lunch meetings and grabbing as much as she could as quickly as she could. Apparently she and her siblings had to behave like wolves at the dinner table or they would go hungry. She never overcame that sense of desperation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #67
78. the most I know of is 19
I know a guy that has 18 brothers & sisters. He doesn't talk about it. I don't think I would either!!! He himself has 2 daughters period.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #67
93. This family of eight I know... they do the same thing.
The table manners really suck. About half of them just tend to grab as much as they can, they eat as fast as they can, tend not to talk during meals because they gotta shove that food down their gizzards really fast so they can grab some more before the others do. I guess the parents never made enough for meals for the kids and those habits stuck with them. They all talk about the mother as if she were great and frugal and all that crap. I thought she was frivilous for having all those kids she couldn't quite keep fed to the point they weren't hungry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
70.  They're probably working on another one next week
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 01:58 PM by barb162
Really, I don't understand this kind of behavior, especially if they have no live-in help. Between the huge size of the house, the number of kids, the home-schooling, when do they spend "regular" time with the kids or when do they have time for anything? Maybe they sleep one hour a night? Do they take three vehicles to go on vacation or can they go on vacation? If they go on vacation, do they ask for 5 hotel rooms? DO they ever watch the news? I can't really deal with the numbers and how they move around. "Oh honey, can you pick up six gallons of milk on your way home and five pounds of vegetables for dinner tonight?

It could very well be like the "collecting" sickness, except worse because the collectors usually say they wanted to rescue the animals and their intentions were good,but the numbers got out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #70
88. They did a reality show, about Duggars, they got a mobile home & loaded it
so they could go on their first vacation but it was so heavy they couldn't get above 20 MPH & they had to stop and split the family in two after borrowing their inlaws vehicle

All the kids wear just 1 color shirt, red for boys and blue for girls or vice versa, I don't remember. Laundry never leaves the laundry room as there is no point in putting it away.

Kids said their favorite foods were things like pickles so I don't guess they got many snacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #88
92. That's a laugh
They'd probably need a mobile home about 90 feet long. They should just rent an Amtrak train for their vacations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. How many kids should each couple have? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. 0 environmental impact is 2
One couple + 2 kids = 0 impact to the environment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
86. Agreed.
For the Earth's sake, I hope she hits menopause soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #86
91. I thought the same thing
Women who are pregnant that much in their fertile years often go into early menopause. Hopefully it will be soon. I do not admire these people; they scare me, and the worst part is that the White Supremacy groups claim them and other Caucasian couples having loads of children. They feel they are beating back the "hoard" of non-whites "overbreeding" and taking the majority in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Slightly less than the "replacement rate".
The "replacement rate" is about 2.18 (IIRC), so to put
more meat onLiberal n Proud's point, 2.0 would be slightly
less than the replacement rate, leading to a slow long-term
drop in population. One child would be even better.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGrantt57 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Somebody should tell her...
it's a vagina...it's not a clown car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feminazi Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. OMG!!! That's funny.
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
axollot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
51. OMG I haven't laughed so hard here in YEARS! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
53. (You bad)
but funny as hell. I'm laughing my tush off.
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katamaran Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
77. This pic was taken with 13 kids in it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocratesInSpirit Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. aww crap
I posted before I realized you beat me to it! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #77
98. He looks like a Republican Congressman
you know, one of the ones that you pull the string in their back and they say something about lower taxes. Actually, now that I read the article, he was a state rep. I'm guessing the Republican one that took any possible opportunity to say "It's a child, not a choice."

I hate slamming people for doing something perfectly legal and that isn't hurting me in any way, but this is just unnatural to want this many kids. A couple in my home town has 15 (3 adopted) and they're religious freaks, surprise surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocratesInSpirit Donating Member (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
79. Here's the graphic for that



:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. They do know what causes that don't they??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bob Duggar: former state rep

They are conservative fundamentalist Christians. Need I say more?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Bob_Duggar

The children are home schooled. Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. "The children are home schooled." Seems to me
that home-schooling works best when a parent has the time and energy to commit to it. No one with several children who aren't yet school age and a bunch of kids at different grade levels is going to be very effective.

I truly feel sorry for the kids. It isn't their fault they were born into this freak show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. "Home-schooled"? More like teaching themselves after a certain
point, I bet. I don't think there is enough time in a day to teach each child at their individual level. Some self-teaching is good, too, though.

Does any one of these kids have more than a minute to a parent each day? Or are the parents just lying around trying to breed some more?

I wonder when her uterus is going to fall out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
55. I wonder if she has live-in help or something.
I know a woman who had 8 kids and they all went to regular school. I thought that many kids was way over the top. Does she do about 40 loads of laundry a week? What's it like going to the grocery? Six shopping carts? I can't imagine this lifestyle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #55
89. Nope the kids all have lots of chores & everyone wear's just 1 of 2 colors for a shirt
and everyone wears khaki pants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
101. This is how the crazy christians get around the schooling laws
ALL these kids learn is the Bible. I'll bet my next 50 paychecks on that.

That's how they have time for the family. Everything they need to know about the world and about life is in the Bible.

Didn't you know that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow.
I don't care about the "overpopulation" angle, but I think it's a far from ideal situation, that's for sure. How can two parents care for so many children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeFleur1 Donating Member (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Can't
Of course they can't care for so many children. They most likely pawn them off on neighbors, fellow church members, or older children who get stuck raising their siblings instead of living their lives.
Selfish, selfish people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
41. Not to mention remember names...
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 11:59 AM by 4_TN_TITANS
Bottom line is that they could provide the basics for them but real 'care'?

on edit:
I'm sitting next to a pregnant coworker, who could imagine 17 years of pregnancy/recovery??? These people would make rabbits say 'what tha hell?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Publicly enoucarge irresponsible reproduction

This has become a gig for them.

17 children.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. That can't be good for the woman's health. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddhaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. from the link:
"Among the "fun facts" listed on Discovery Health's Web page devoted to the Duggars: A baby has been born in every month except June; the Duggars have gone through an estimated 90,000 diapers, and Michelle, 40, has been pregnant for 126 months — or 10.5 years — of her life."

She's been pregnant for 126 months???????? OMG!!!

I guess they don't give a shit about overpopulation and using far more of their share of the earth's resources 'cause it's "God's Will" after all! :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. How many is too many for each couple?
Do you want to restrict it somehow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
96. Sterilize her
Now.

It's beyond irresponsible or healthy in any way, shape, or form for a human to breed like a jackrabbit on speed.

I say it's time to end the taboo on forced sterilization. Tie her tubes NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. pregnant a 4th of her life
amazing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Live and let live... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
52. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
102. I doubt they believe in that
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 09:45 AM by kgfnally
They're christish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's a litter, not a family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Its all a miracle until they ask for public assistance.
Then they're no longer "blessed with a large family" but rather a couple of people who "breed like rabbits".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
35. Amazingly, they are debt free. That's how they can afford the kids.
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 11:42 AM by CottonBear
They started in the real estate investment field and somehow manged to pay as they went witout accruing debt. That, to me, is more amazing than having 17 kids.

I would dearly love to have a child but if I can that will be all I can afford as a single parent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cullen2382 Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. OMG!
I have two and they drive me crazy. How can you watch all those children? How do you discipline all those children? How do you not lose your mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. These people are nucking futs....
What's wrong with a woman who just wants to be a baby machine??? What's wrong with her husband that he's making her into one???

just my two cents..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. My Question is..
How can they afford 17 kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
36. They are debt free. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggplant Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Who cares?
It sounds like the family is doing fine. Who are you to tell them how many kids they should have? Where was there a hint that they would need financial assistance? How does one family in Arkansas affect global overpopulation? Are they running out of space in Arkansas? Or is it their religion that has you in such a tizzy?

Honestly -- such knee-jerk reactions to a benign story is really sad. It makes us look as bad as the freepers.

Wish them well, and move on. We have real problems to deal with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm with you. Who cares?
Unless of course people want to start restricting the number of children each couple can have. I bet no one advocates that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Me too.
Personally, I wouldn't want to be responsible for all those kids, but that's my own opinion. What makes this country great is that each of us has personal freedoms - including the freedom to be (what I would consider) irresponsible if we want to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #21
82. You may be betting wrong
I can foresee a situation where that would be the rational thing to do- and people like the Duggers are poster children for policies like that'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
103. Just let this thread go on for a little longer
You'll see some of that, too. Personally, I think that if this is working for them, good for them and who cares? My mother's best friend had 18 kids, and none of them ever had to rush through a meal, or felt like sibling care was foisted upon them unduly. Then again, being judgmental feels so good, lots of people on this thread, I guess, just can't resist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. It's not about the space. It's about the waste.

90,000 diapers. And there are so many parentless children in the world....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. No, it is all about crushing a woman's right to choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #37
68. Where did that come from?

Let's not throw flames here. Talking about overpopulation and resources
does not equal a "pro-life" stance. The other topic is about the attention
each child gets. My parents had 5 children, and I can assure you there was
far less attention and affection than most children get. My parents were stressed
out and easily aggravated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
72. When USAmericans use five times the resources people in other countries use?
You better believe it's concerning. This is selfish behavior.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #72
99. saw a blip on them the other night
talk about using resources - they have EIGHT washing machines, all going practically non-stop; all the boys live in one dorm room; all the girls in another. The parents drop in for a visit each night, then trot off to make more babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
84. Overpopulation isn't a real problem???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laureloak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
23. How selfish.
I read that if all couples limited themselves to 1 child the planet would return to the population level of 1900.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zehnkatzen Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. Well, there's one Arkansas stereotype reinforced...
...fundy Xtian homeschoolers having too damn many kids.

Now, mind, I don't think it should be necessary to place a limit on how many kids a couple should have. That's because here, in the Sane World, having 17 kids and thinking about number 18 is seen as a bit over the top; most people know this violates common sense.

Maybe they heard that it takes a village to raise a child, and figured they could supply their own village. They'd better have stout friends and neighbors, at least; it'll take a city to raise that group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
29. All the children — whose names start with the letter J — are home-schooled
Read that line again.
If you read it the way I did the first time, what about the kids whose names don't start with the letter J


Fortunately the all start with J so they all live in their own little Duggar world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #29
62. I don't get the naming thing
Every time I see a news story about parents who have 3.2x1016 children or whatever, their names always start with the same letter. What the hell is it with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #62
74. Probably some family tradition started 2000 years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. God Bless them and Tiny Tim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itchinjim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
32. I grew up a few doors down from a family of twenty children.
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 11:33 AM by Itchinjim
The father was a lawyer and the mother was housewife. All twenty children went to collage and are very successful and well adjusted adults. Both parents were active in local Democratic politics and last I heard all the kids were staunch Dems. So there are some benefits to society from large families.

(grammer edit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. Thank you for a reality check.
Bobby Kennedy sired 11 kids but do we complain about that?

Families this size are statistical outliers. Not everybody is doing this, so they alone are not overpopulating the earth.

Chances are the kids will grow up conservative and Republican, a thought which inspires dread around here, but do we know that will happen? There's a good statistical chance at least one will be gay; some may rebel against their background and cross the aisle politically. The family is basically loving, so chances are too that they'll grow up tightknit, decent and productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
57. I know a family of 8 that were brought up Republican and about
half became Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. Biggest benefit = tax breaks
Hell, the IRS probably owes THEM thousands of dollars a year after all those deductions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raebrek Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. Tax Breaks only go so far.
They can't give you back more then you pay in.

Raebrek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mancandy Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. But me and my partner are not.....
suitable to be parents. :sarcasm: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
34. This has got to be some sort of sickness. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Man with a pregnancy fetish maybe??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Ha ha ha ah....could be.
Rather expensive and long lasting fetish Id say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
38. oh, Christ on a trailer hitch, not the Duggars!
remember how Michelle started forgetting the kids' names? And of course the large property is so the kids can build their own houses and families a few yards from their parents--a whole compound! It's like watching one of the Children of the Corn grow up: will they shoot Michelle when she hits menopause? No oocytes, no value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
94. Like in HBO's "Big Love" series--
a compound like Juniper Creek?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
40. No way in hell can I wrap my mind around a woman having
seventeen children. Some of the children look the same age. The parents have gone through an estimated 90,000 diapers.

?x=380&y=258&sig=8.YQXdsdT9HJrPmCFh58aQ--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
42. That's their business if they want to have oodles of children.
But all I can say is that they are gluttons for punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarhammerTwo Donating Member (113 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. From what I understand...
...the older kids are old enough to act as caregivers to the younger kids. That's how the mom keeps up after them all. She has the older kids act as nannies.

I also saw on a Discovery channel show (quite some time ago...when there were only 13 kids, I think) that they make all their own clothes. She buys huge rolls of fabric in bulk then makes dresses for the girls and dress shirts and slacks for the boys. Then the outfits get handed down. When an outfit gets worn out, they make a new one. And the kids are taught to make the clothes as well. So think of that. 17 kids all wearing the exact same outfit, day in and day out. Is it any wonder they're home schooled. Do you realize how badly they'd get mocked for wearing identical threads? Hell, I remember when I showed up for school one day in seventh grade wearing a hand-me-down jean jacket that wasn't a "brand" name. I never wore that to school again. Then there's the whole "J" name thing.

For food, they buy in bulk at a warehouse store. They built their own house and the older boys, along with dad did all the labor. I think they got their neighbors to help out who (if I recall correctly) have 11 or 12 kids as well. So that's how they save money. By making everything themselves and using the kids as the workforce.

Despite all that, I don't know what kind of health insurance they have but it's gotta be pretty good to cover all the medical care that the kids need, plus all the pre- and post-natal care mom needs. That's what I want to know. How do they pay for their medical expenses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
73. All very common practices
a few generations ago, back before that marvelous 20th century innovation, reliable birth control. My mother came from a largish family - 7 children - and she talks about caring for my youngest aunt when my grandparents were both at work, and clothes and toys all got handed down - my first bicycle was originally my mother's, then her sisters', then mine, then my sisters'- and one of them still has it.

17's a bit much. When you can't remember the kids' names, maybe it's time to stop. And if the mother is only about 40 now, when did she start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
45. If you want to know

I believe this is what is really going on in this situation.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiverfull
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Oh, that reads like bad news. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. I love the implication that their children are ammunition. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #45
76. I think you're right
It ties in to this kind of thinking:

http://www.alternet.org/story/57001

"Do you have a child back in England?" she asks. No, I say. Her face darkens. "You'd better start," she says. "The Muslims are breeding. Soon, they'll have the whole of Europe."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. Camo the kids up and send them to Iraq. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. I can understand wanting to have a big family ....
It's not for me, but I can understand that some couples like the hustle and bustle of lots of kids. What I don't understand is feeling that they personally have to create all of them. There are so many children who need good homes - over 100,000 in the US alone. That's not counting children who need good foster care. Say what you will about Brangelina and their international family, adoption makes more sense to me if you want to raise many children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #50
58.  Really good points you have there.
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 01:14 PM by barb162
I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
54. I wonder how many more she'll grunt out.
Overpopulation? Michelle Duggar: Who me? Huh? What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
59. My first boyfriend came from a family of 10 kids
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 01:27 PM by superconnected
and he was always embarassed to say so. The parents were both teachers but they were literally dirt poor. Holes in the walls and floor in their home, etc. I only saw his house once because he was too embarassed to bring me there and I showed up unexpected. He couldn't usher me out fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe1991 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
60. This family does sound a bit wacky, BUT
I don't know about you, but the thing that bothers me most is very few of us could afford to have a large family nowadays.

My 96 yr old Grandma had NINE children. My Grandpa had a very average pay job at a refinery here in TX, and they got along fine.

They had an average size house on several acres. Each weekend my Grandpa would take one kid and spend the day shopping, buying the child clothes or shoes, maybe a haircut, whatever they needed, then a treat, burger or ice cream before returning home.

How many of us have zero, one or two children and struggle to get through the month?
And how many average couples could afford to live on a single income? ...Let alone have a housefull of kids??

I think that is why so many people on both sides of the aile feel like they're being "screwed", whatever the causes. Most of us are busting our butts and feel like we're just treading water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. 30 years ago 1 person could support the whole family.
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 01:30 PM by superconnected
today 2 can barely do it. I mean a family of 4.

A person who makes minimum wage cannot afford to rent an apartment in any city in the united states right now. That's is an example of how things have changed. Rent is becoming unaffordable for one income that makes double minimum wage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
64. My great grandparents had something like 12 children.
Some died though on the way over from Ireland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjb Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
69. zpg
My sister and her husband never did have children because they believed in zpg. The joke has been on them. We bring in immigrants(legally) by the thousands year after year and they don't seem to think twice about having a large family. They don't seem to worry about how they can afford to raise them like we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
71. Selfish resource-hogging assholes.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
75. This makes me think of the little baby who died a few years ago...
when she was left inside a hot car after she was forgotten by the family. I can't remember how many kids there were in the family...at least 10. The father did some jail time as I recall.

Sad. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
81. two more and they get that free toaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scatterheart Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
83. Oh goodness.
I made a frantic escape from Arkansas in late May, the day after I graduated high school. Take it from someone who lived there: the last thing the world needs is more Arkansans. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
85. That seems a bit selfish.
Come on now, how many people can our world support? These people must think very highly of themselves to reproduce 17 times and want more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
87. Damn, has this woman had a period in the last 10 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
90. Jim Bob and Michelle = attention whores
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sin Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
95. Every one now....
Every Sperm is Sacred.... http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/265798

Don't watch that at work now :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
97. "Less than 30 minutes after giving birth, the Duggars already were talking of having more"
Edited on Sat Aug-04-07 12:14 AM by barb162
Speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-04-07 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
100. Come on Michelle!! We know you can do it
Go for "18" then "19" then "20"...
The more you have, the more morans there will be supporting repukes
:sarcasm: goes somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC