Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists, Executive Clash Over Quake (Utah mine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:10 AM
Original message
Scientists, Executive Clash Over Quake (Utah mine)
Source: ap





Posted on Wed, Aug. 08, 2007

Scientists, Executive Clash Over Quake
ALICIA CHANG
The Associated Press

LOS ANGELES - Did an earthquake cause a Utah coal mine to cave in, or did the mine collapse trigger the tremors?

A fierce dispute erupted over that question Tuesday, with a top mine executive declaring on national television that he has the science to prove a quake caused the collapse. But seismologists said their instruments recorded shaking from the cave-in and not a natural temblor.

Scientists believe the seismic waves in the area of the Crandall Canyon mine were "the signature of the collapse and that the collapse was not caused by an earthquake," said James W. Dewey, a seismologist at the National Earthquake Information Center in Golden, Colo.

Scientists have not ruled out a natural earthquake since the region surrounding the mine is seismically active, and they do not know the exact time the mine collapsed.

........

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/ap/news/nation_world/20070808_ap_scientistsexecutiveclashoverquake.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. The mine owner 'thinks' global warming is a hoax, also
Another pathetic republicon Homelander kool-aid imbiber.

How perfectly pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, one side of this debate, science, has shown the data and conclusions.
Edited on Wed Aug-08-07 09:19 AM by mikeytherat
The other side claims he has the science, but he has not produced it. He also formed his mining company on advice from a talking squirrel. Seriously:

http://www.umwa.org/journal/VOL112NO4/july1.shtml

:crazy:

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ha ha. thats for that. What a hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Links:
There have been numerous examples of mine collapses triggering ground vibrations sometimes confused with quakes. The USGS has recorded at least seven such instances since 1994, including last year's collapse of an abandoned mine in Virginia that registered a 4.3 magnitude.

Although mining activities have been shown to produce quakes, the opposite is rare. Scientists say it's unusual for a temblor to damage a mine unless it was a big one. In 1976, a 7.8 magnitude quake in China wreaked havoc on coal mines beneath the city of Tangshan.

There are no recorded cases in Utah's history of a natural quake triggering a mine collapse, said Walter Arabasz, director of the University of Utah's seismograph stations.

The Crandall Canyon mine is built into a mountain in the rugged Manti-La Sal National Forest, 140 miles south of Salt Lake City, in a sparsely populated area. The region is crisscrossed with geologic faults, and in 1988, a 5.2 magnitude temblor struck 25 miles southeast of the mine.

,,,

AP researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed to this report.

,,,

On the Net:

U.S. Geological Survey: http://www.usgs.gov

University of Utah Seismograph Stations: http://quake.utah.edu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Mission accomplished
Established scientific fact has now been distorted into a perverse form of "some people say ... others disagree," truth be damned.

When will journalists again have the intestinal fortitude to call a lie what it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep... They're totally overlooking the obvious...
"Conflict of Interest" inherent in the MINE OWNER'S statement and the fact the Scientists have
no such conflict. Why would they?

I haven't heard wide reporting of the "Squirrel Story" in a higher post either. Ah, they're
all bought and paid for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I wonder why the mine owner hasn't produced his "proof"?
Maybe his pet squirrel hasn't finished the report yet. Notoriously short attention spans on those little rodents. Can't stay focused on a task for diddly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Give the man a break, will you? The proof is, unfortunately, buried in the mine
along with the leprechaun who stole it from him. The squirrel had nothing to do with it. This time.

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Damn scientist with all their icky proof and stuff..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC